16 research outputs found

    A 27-year old patient with serous cystadenoma in the pancreatic tail (arrow).

    No full text
    <p>T2 HASTE (A, D), c-EPI DWI (B, E) and z-EPI DWI (C, F) of the pancreas were acquired. z-EPI DWI (C) and zoomed ADC map (F) demonstrate a better delineation of the pancreas and the serous cystadenoma compared to c-EPI DWI (B) and conventional ADC map (E).</p

    A 47-year old patient with c-EPI DWI (A) and z-EPI DWI (B) of the pancreas.

    No full text
    <p>z-EPI DWI demonstrates less distortion and a more homogeneous delineation of the pancreatic head and the main pancreatic duct (arrow).</p

    Mean ADC values (×10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) in the volunteer population.

    No full text
    <p>ADC values in bold are significantly different (p<0.05) from the other two values in the same distribution. ADC values with an asterisk are significantly different from each other. There are no significant differences (p≥0.05) between mean ADC values between two values that are not bolded or have an asterisk. The deeper regions, which are susceptible to B<sub>1</sub> inhomogeneity artifacts, are listed in rows 1–3.</p

    Comparison of renal ADC-values between all three MR-scanners.

    No full text
    <p>Bland-Altman plot of mean ADC values from the right kidney comparing the 1.5 T system with the (A) first generation 3 T and (B) second generation 3 T MR-scanners in the volunteer population. The mean ADC values are similar amongst all three systems. (x-axis: average/y-axis: difference of ADC at 1.5 T and the corresponding 3 T systems (×10-3 mm<sup>3</sup>/s)).</p
    corecore