The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the physician orders for lifesustaining treatment form. J Am Geriatr Soc

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the consistency between treatments provided and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) orders. DESIGN: Retrospective chart abstraction. SETTING: Stratified, random sample of 90 nursing facilities in Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred seventy living and deceased nursing facility residents aged 65 and older with a minimum 60-day stay. MEASUREMENTS: Chart data about POLST form orders and related treatments over a 60-day period were abstracted. Decision rules were created to determine whether the rationale for each treatment was consistent with POLST orders. RESULTS: Most residents (85.2%) had the same POLST form in place during the review period. A majority of treatments provided to residents with orders for comfort measures only (74.3%) and limited antibiotics (83.3%) were consistent with POLST orders because they were primarily comfort focused rather than life-prolonging, but antibiotics were provided to 32.1% of residents with orders for no antibiotics. Overall consistency rates between treatments and POLST orders were high for resuscitation (98%), medical interventions (91.1%), and antibiotics (92.9%) and modest for feeding tubes (63.6%). In all, POLST orders were consistent with treatments provided 94.0% of the time. CONCLUSION: With the exception of feeding tubes and antibiotic use in residents with orders for no antibiotics, the use of medical treatments was nearly always consistent with POLST orders to provide or withhold life-sustaining interventions. The POLST program is a useful tool for ensuring that the treatment preferences of nursing facility residents are honored. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2091-2099, 2011. Key words: ethics; end of life; comfort care; palliative care; nursing facility A primary goal of advance care planning is to ensure that treatments are consistent with patient preferences near the end of life. Advance directives have been promoted as an important advance care planning tool that enables individuals to record their preferences to guide treatment decisions in the event of incapacitation, but research suggests that advance directives are generally ineffective at ensuring that treatment preferences are honored because of numerous limitations. 1-3 An alternative approach is the use of medical orders such as do not resuscitate (DNR) that communicate preferences in a format that other healthcare professionals can follow. However, such orders typically focus on one type of life-sustaining treatment and do not address the broad range of potential treatments that may be needed

The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the physician orders for lifesustaining treatment form. J Am Geriatr Soc

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the consistency between treatments provided and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) orders. DESIGN: Retrospective chart abstraction. SETTING: Stratified, random sample of 90 nursing facilities in Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred seventy living and deceased nursing facility residents aged 65 and older with a minimum 60-day stay. MEASUREMENTS: Chart data about POLST form orders and related treatments over a 60-day period were abstracted. Decision rules were created to determine whether the rationale for each treatment was consistent with POLST orders. RESULTS: Most residents (85.2%) had the same POLST form in place during the review period. A majority of treatments provided to residents with orders for comfort measures only (74.3%) and limited antibiotics (83.3%) were consistent with POLST orders because they were primarily comfort focused rather than life-prolonging, but antibiotics were provided to 32.1% of residents with orders for no antibiotics. Overall consistency rates between treatments and POLST orders were high for resuscitation (98%), medical interventions (91.1%), and antibiotics (92.9%) and modest for feeding tubes (63.6%). In all, POLST orders were consistent with treatments provided 94.0% of the time. CONCLUSION: With the exception of feeding tubes and antibiotic use in residents with orders for no antibiotics, the use of medical treatments was nearly always consistent with POLST orders to provide or withhold life-sustaining interventions. The POLST program is a useful tool for ensuring that the treatment preferences of nursing facility residents are honored. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011. Key words: ethics; end of life; comfort care; palliative care; nursing facility A primary goal of advance care planning is to ensure that treatments are consistent with patient preferences near the end of life. Advance directives have been promoted as an important advance care planning tool that enables individuals to record their preferences to guide treatment decisions in the event of incapacitation, but research suggests that advance directives are generally ineffective at ensuring that treatment preferences are honored because of numerous limitations. 1-3 An alternative approach is the use of medical orders such as do not resuscitate (DNR) that communicate preferences in a format that other healthcare professionals can follow. However, such orders typically focus on one type of life-sustaining treatment and do not address the broad range of potential treatments that may be needed

Multistudy Research Operations in the ICU: An Interprofessional Pandemic-Informed Approach

OBJECTIVES:. Proliferation of COVID-19 research underscored the need for improved awareness among investigators, research staff and bedside clinicians of the operational details of clinical studies. The objective was to describe the genesis, goals, participation, procedures, and outcomes of two research operations committees in an academic ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN:. Two-phase, single-center multistudy cohort. SETTING:. University-affiliated ICU in Hamilton, ON, Canada. PATIENTS:. Adult patients in the ICU, medical stepdown unit, or COVID-19 ward. INTERVENTIONS:. None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. An interprofessional COVID Collaborative was convened at the pandemic onset within our department, to proactively coordinate studies, help navigate multiple authentic consent encounters by different research staff, and determine which studies would be suitable for coenrollment. From March 2020 to May 2021, five non-COVID trials continued, two were paused then restarted, and five were launched. Over 15 months, 161 patients were involved in 215 trial enrollments, 110 (51.1%) of which were into a COVID treatment trial. The overall informed consent rate (proportion agreed of those eligible and approached including a priori and deferred consent models) was 83% (215/259). The informed consent rate was lower for COVID-19 trials (110/142, 77.5%) than other trials (105/117, 89.7%; p = 0.01). Patients with COVID-19 were significantly more likely to be coenrolled in two or more studies (29/77, 37.7%) compared with other patients (13/84, 15.5%; p = 0.002). Review items for each new study were collated, refined, and evolved into a modifiable checklist template to set up each study for success. The COVID Collaborative expanded to a more formal Department of Critical Care Research Operations Committee in June 2021, supporting sustainable research operations during and beyond the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS:. Structured coordination and increased communication about research operations among diverse research stakeholders cultivated a sense of shared purpose and enhanced the integrity of clinical research operations