The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the physician orders for lifesustaining treatment form. J Am Geriatr Soc
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the consistency between treatments provided and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) orders. DESIGN: Retrospective chart abstraction. SETTING: Stratified, random sample of 90 nursing facilities in Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred seventy living and deceased nursing facility residents aged 65 and older with a minimum 60-day stay. MEASUREMENTS: Chart data about POLST form orders and related treatments over a 60-day period were abstracted. Decision rules were created to determine whether the rationale for each treatment was consistent with POLST orders. RESULTS: Most residents (85.2%) had the same POLST form in place during the review period. A majority of treatments provided to residents with orders for comfort measures only (74.3%) and limited antibiotics (83.3%) were consistent with POLST orders because they were primarily comfort focused rather than life-prolonging, but antibiotics were provided to 32.1% of residents with orders for no antibiotics. Overall consistency rates between treatments and POLST orders were high for resuscitation (98%), medical interventions (91.1%), and antibiotics (92.9%) and modest for feeding tubes (63.6%). In all, POLST orders were consistent with treatments provided 94.0% of the time. CONCLUSION: With the exception of feeding tubes and antibiotic use in residents with orders for no antibiotics, the use of medical treatments was nearly always consistent with POLST orders to provide or withhold life-sustaining interventions. The POLST program is a useful tool for ensuring that the treatment preferences of nursing facility residents are honored. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2091-2099, 2011. Key words: ethics; end of life; comfort care; palliative care; nursing facility A primary goal of advance care planning is to ensure that treatments are consistent with patient preferences near the end of life. Advance directives have been promoted as an important advance care planning tool that enables individuals to record their preferences to guide treatment decisions in the event of incapacitation, but research suggests that advance directives are generally ineffective at ensuring that treatment preferences are honored because of numerous limitations. 1-3 An alternative approach is the use of medical orders such as do not resuscitate (DNR) that communicate preferences in a format that other healthcare professionals can follow. However, such orders typically focus on one type of life-sustaining treatment and do not address the broad range of potential treatments that may be needed
