15 research outputs found

    Recognising and managing childhood onset uveitis: a guide for primary care

    Get PDF

    Show don’t tell: assessing the impact of co-developed patient information videos in paediatric uveitis

    Get PDF
    Background/Objectives: There is a paucity of online educational content targeting children and young people with uveitis. We evaluated the impact of a co-designed patient education video on subjective and objective understanding of childhood uveitis. Subjects/Methods: Co-designed patient education media were produced in collaboration with the Childhood Uveitis Studies steering group and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Generation R Young People’s Advisory Group and narrated by children. Patients managed within the Uveitis service at GOSH were invited to take part in a pre–post survey, undertaken immediately prior to and following viewing of a patient education video. Results: Forty-three patients participated. These were stratified according to age, duration of disease, and treatment type for analysis. Self-rated knowledge improved across all groups (p = 0.001), particularly in those with a new diagnosis of uveitis (Z = −8.124, p < 0.001). Objective knowledge scores improved across all questions, especially in younger children, those with new disease, and those on steroid only treatment (Z = −3.847, p < 0.001, Z = −3.975, p < 0.001, Z = −3.448, p < 0.001; respectively). Most participants reported the videos to be easy to understand and with the right amount of information. All stated that they learned something new. Conclusions: Patient understanding of disease and treatment is crucial to achieving the best possible outcomes for this chronic, relapsing remitting and potentially blinding disorder. Our findings data shows the potential value of co-designed patient information videos, specifically in our study benefitting younger patients and those recently diagnosed. We suggest that other clinical teams could collaborate fruitfully with patient groups to develop similar videos to target possible misinformation and potentially improve patient outcomes

    Quality assessment of anterior segment OCT images: development and validation of quality criteria

    Get PDF
    Background: The utility of medical imaging is dependent on image quality. We aimed to develop and validate quality criteria for ocular anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images. Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional study using AS-OCT images from patients aged 6-16. A novel three-level grading system (good, limited or poor) was developed based on the presence of image artefact (categorised as lid, eyelash, cropping, glare, or movement artefact). Three independent experts graded 2825 images, with agreement assessed using confusion matrices and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for each parameter. Results: There was very good inter-grader IQA agreement assessing image quality with ICC 0.85 (95%CI: 0.84-0.87). The most commonly occurring artefact was eyelash artefact (1008/2825 images, 36%). Graders labelled 621/2825 (22%) images as good and 384 (14%) as poor. There was complete agreement at either end of the confusion matrix with no ‘good’ images labelled as ‘poor’ by other graders, and vice versa. Similarly, there was very good agreement when assessing presence of lash (0.96,0.94-0.98), movement (0.97,0.96-0.99), glare (0.82,0.80-0.84) and cropping (0.90,0.88-0.92). Conclusions: The novel image quality assessment criteria (IQAC) described here have good interobserver agreement overall, and excellent agreement on the differentiation between ‘good’ and ‘poor’ quality images. The large proportion of images graded as ‘limited’ suggests the need for refine this classification, using the specific IQAC features, for which we also report high interobserver agreement. These findings support the future potential for wider clinical and community care implementation of AS-OCT for the diagnosis and monitoring of ocular disease

    Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography-Confirmed Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

    No full text
    Retinal manifestations have been reported in Covid-19 patients including paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) and vasculitis.1-4 A case series of 12 visually asymptomatic Covid-19 patients reported inner retinal hyper-reflective bands despite normal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A).1 Concerns about this report have been raised in another article.5 We describe the first case of OCT-A confirmed SARS-CoV-2-related PAMM

    Long-term ocular and visual outcomes following symptomatic and asymptomatic congenital CMV infection: a systematic review protocol

    Get PDF
    Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common congenitally acquired infections worldwide. Visual impairment is a common outcome for symptomatic infants, with long-term ophthalmic surveillance often recommended. However, there are no clear guidelines for ophthalmic surveillance in infants with asymptomatic disease. We aim to conduct a systematic review to establish the overall prevalence and incidence of eye and vision related disorders following congenital CMV infection (cCMV).A systematic review and meta-analysis (pending appropriate data for analysis) of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies will be conducted. The PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases will be searched up to 29 March 2022 without date or language restrictions. Studies will be screened by at least two independent reviewers. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The primary outcome measures will be incidence and/or prevalence of vision impairment or ophthalmic disorders in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic cCMV infection. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. The overall prevalence will be estimated by pooling data using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies will be estimated using Cochran's Q and the I2 statistics. Egger's test will be used to assess for publication bias.Ethical approval is not required as there is no primary data collection. Study findings will be disseminated at scientific meetings and through publication in peer-reviewed journals.This is not a clinical trial, but the protocol has been registered: CRD42021284678 (PROSPERO). </h4
    corecore