2 research outputs found

    MCCD ventilation - Case-Figure 7

    No full text
    The patient received a ventilation rate of 100 breaths per minute. This rate corresponds with the MCCD frequency and ventilation was being triggered in each decompression phase. The drop in the ventilation rate between 18:50 and 19:10 minutes was due to a leak in the airway circuit. During the period of automatic ventilation, oxygen saturation was between 80 and 90%. Thus, the patient was adequately ventilated. The etCO2 ranged between 22-30mmHg from the beginning of the recording till 23:28 minutes after, suggesting good quality CPR with adequate circulation. After 23:28 min there was an increase in etCO<sub>2</sub> up to 43mmHg, an early indicator of ROSC. The steep decrease after 24:32 min was due to the cessation of ventilation and chest compressions, and hence a cessation in CO<sub>2</sub>-exhalation. The patient had a ROSC after 25 minutes

    Optical coherence tomography tissue coverage and characterization at six months after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus conventional everolimus eluting stents in the ISAR-Absorb MI trial

    No full text
    Purpose: Data regarding vessel healing by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) or everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) implantation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is scarce. We compared OCT findings after BRS or EES implantation in patients with AMI enrolled in a randomized trial.Methods: In ISAR-Absorb MI, AMI patients were randomized to BRS or EES implantation, with 6-8 month angiographic follow-up. This analysis includes patients who underwent OCT during surveillance angiography. Tissue characterization was done using grey-scale signal intensity analysis. The association between OCT findings and target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years was investigated.Results: OCT was analyzed in 103 patients (2237 frames, 19,827 struts) at a median of 216 days post-implantation. Of these, 70 were treated with BRS versus 32 with EES. Pre-(92.8 vs. 68.7%, p = 0.002) and post-dilation (51.4 vs. 12.5%, p Conclusions: In selected patients who underwent OCT surveillance 6-8 months after coronary intervention for AMI with differing implantation characteristics depending on the device type used, vessel healing was more advanced in BRS compared with EES, particularly in the STEMI subgroup.</div
    corecore