6 research outputs found

    Visualization 2: Remote z-scanning with a macroscopic voice coil motor for fast 3D multiphoton laser scanning microscopy

    No full text
    Supplementary Movie 2. Data from Fig. 6. Reduced data quality due to compression. Originally published in Biomedical Optics Express on 01 May 2016 (boe-7-5-1656

    Different spike inference metrics reach similar conclusions.

    No full text
    <p><b>A.</b> Area under the curve (AUC) of the inferred spike rate used as a binary predictor for the presence of spikes (evaluated at 25 Hz, 50 ms bins) on the test set. Colors indicate different datasets. Black dots are mean correlation coefficients across all <i>N</i> = 32 cells in the test set. Colored dots are jittered for better visibility. STM: Spike-triggered mixture model [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006157#pcbi.1006157.ref015" target="_blank">15</a>]; f-oopsi: fast non-negative deconvolution [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006157#pcbi.1006157.ref009" target="_blank">9</a>] <b>B.</b> Information gain of the inferred spike rate about the true spike rate on the test set (evaluated at 25 Hz, 40 ms bins).</p

    Summary of algorithm performance.

    No full text
    <p>螖 correlation is computed as the mean difference in correlation coefficient compared to the STM algorithm. 螖 var. exp. in % is computed as the mean relative improvement variance explained (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>). Note that since variance explained is a nonlinear function of correlation, algorithms can be ranked differently according to the two measures. All means are taken over <i>N</i> = 32 recordings in the test set, except for training correlation, which is computed over <i>N</i> = 60 recordings in the training set.</p
    corecore