Multinomial logistic regression coefficients for odds of abstention and heavy alcohol consumption across adulthood (ref. = light to moderate).

<p>Multinomial logistic regression coefficients for odds of abstention and heavy alcohol consumption across adulthood (ref. = light to moderate).</p

Descriptive information (means and SDs or proportions) and corresponding p values for bivariate between-group tests for each health behavior.

<p>Descriptive information (means and SDs or proportions) and corresponding p values for bivariate between-group tests for each health behavior.</p

Multinomial logistic regression coefficients for odds of light to moderate and heavy smoking pack years (ref. = lifetime non-smoking)

<p>Multinomial logistic regression coefficients for odds of light to moderate and heavy smoking pack years (ref. = lifetime non-smoking)</p

Flow and selection of subject records for inclusion into naïve comparisons and propensity score analyses.

<p>Flow and selection of subject records for inclusion into naïve comparisons and propensity score analyses.</p

Logistic regression of OTT versus FTF generating estimates and standard errors for variables included in the propensity score.

<p>Note: Values in bold indicate significant associations (p<.01).</p

Overview of bibliographic databases used to identify relevant citations.

*<p>Accessed 29^th February, 2012.</p

Citations reporting incidence of schizophrenia over time in England, 1881–1999, organised by study setting.

†<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031660#s3" target="_blank">Results</a> from Dumfries & Galloway (Scotland) not officially part of present review but included as part of study.</p>‡<p>First time period lies outside the scope of this review, but results presented in table for completeness.</p>∧<p>(+) Increase in rate; (−) decrease in rate; (∼) no change in rate observed.</p

Average reductions in PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WSAS scores for FTF versus OTT therapy groups.

<p>Reductions in PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WASAS are each shown in a different pane. Comparisons between the reductions in the FTF and OTT groups shown by paired bars; OTT is always the upper and FTF the lower. These are presented first for the overall sample (adjusted and unadjusted; the first, naïve approach to analysis), then for the five propensity strata, and last for the 1∶1 matching procedure. Other than the first, unadjusted reductions, all average reductions (in the strata comparisons and in the 1∶1 matching) are adjusted for service provider, number sessions administered, and baseline symptom severity for the particular measure (PHQ9, GAD7 or WSAS). See: <a href="http://www.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/PONE-D-11-20688-Figures.doc" target="_blank">http://www.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/PONE-D-11-20688-Figures.doc</a> for colour version.</p

Published reports of overall incidence of affective psychosis, including bipolar disorder and the depressive psychosis, and substance-induced psychoses, England, 1950–2009.

1<p>ÆSOP: Southeast London, Nottingham, Bristol.</p>2<p>Composite perceived urbanicity rank, assessed by 4 raters (JBK, PBJ, TJC, RM). 1 = most urban, 38 = least urban.</p>3<p>Mid-year of case ascertainment period (duration in years).</p>4<p>Study quality according to criteria outlined in methodology. Min = 0, Max = 7.</p>5<p>Numbers <i><u>underlined in italics</u></i> denote a derived N – not reported in original citation but possible to derive from other provided data.</p>6<p>Crude incidence per 100,000 unless specified. <i><u>Underlined italics</u></i> denote derived rate.</p

Treatment characteristics and course in FTF versus OTT groups matched 1∶1 on the basis of propensity scores.

<p>Note: Values in bold indicate significant associations (p<.01).</p