15 research outputs found

    A Clinical Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Development, Consensus, and Future Directions.

    No full text
    Disease activity and severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) dictate therapeutic options and management, but the decision-making process for determining severity varies among practitioners. To reduce variability in practice patterns and help clinicians monitor the clinical course of the disease in an office setting, we aimed to create an international consensus severity scoring index for EoE. A multidisciplinary international group of adult and pediatric EoE researchers and clinicians, as well as non-EoE allergy immunology and gastroenterology experts, formed 3 teams to review the existing literature on histology, endoscopy, and symptoms of EoE in the context of progression and severity. A steering committee convened a 1-day virtual meeting to reach consensus on each team's opinion on salient features of severity across key clinicopathologic domains and distill features that would allow providers to categorize disease severity. Symptom features and complications and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features on both endoscopic and histologic examination were collated into a simplified scoring system-the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE)-that can be completed at routine clinic visits to assess disease severity using a point scale of 0-6 for mild, 7-14 for moderate, and ≥15 for severe EoE. A multidisciplinary team of experts iteratively created a clinically usable EoE severity scoring system denominated "I-SEE" to guide practitioners in EoE management by standardizing disease components reflecting disease severity beyond eosinophil counts. I-SEE should be validated and refined using data from future clinical trials and routine clinical practice to increase its utilization and functionality

    Silica and other materials as supports in liquid chromatography. Chromatographic tests and their importance for evaluating these supports. Part I

    No full text
    Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) has become a powerful and widely employed technique in the separation and analysis of a great variety of compounds with different functionalities. The most common type of stationary phase for RP-HPLC consists of nonpolar, hydrophobic organic species (e.g., octyl, octadecyl) attached by siloxane bonds to the surface of a silica support. In the first part of this article, a description of the many beneficial properties that make porous silica the most employed support in RP-HPLC will be presented, starting from the synthesis of silica. It is noteworthy that the chromatographic properties of the final column are strictly correlated to the preparation type. A silica surface possesses a number of attractive properties, but also some drawbacks. Unreacted or residual silanols interact with basic compounds and can induced peak tailing, which means a loss in chromatographic performance. This problem has lead many manufactures to produce stationary phases with reduced silanol activity which improve dramatically the peak shape of basic compounds. In the second part of this review, different approaches are proposed to obtain less reactive stationary phases

    Silica and other materials as supports in liquid chromatography. Chromatographic tests and their importance for evaluating these supports. Part I

    No full text
    corecore