Interpolation in Valiant's theory

We investigate the following question: if a polynomial can be evaluated at rational points by a polynomial-time boolean algorithm, does it have a polynomial-size arithmetic circuit? We argue that this question is certainly difficult. Answering it negatively would indeed imply that the constant-free versions of the algebraic complexity classes VP and VNP defined by Valiant are different. Answering this question positively would imply a transfer theorem from boolean to algebraic complexity. Our proof method relies on Lagrange interpolation and on recent results connecting the (boolean) counting hierarchy to algebraic complexity classes. As a byproduct we obtain two additional results: (i) The constant-free, degree-unbounded version of Valiant's hypothesis that VP and VNP differ implies the degree-bounded version. This result was previously known to hold for fields of positive characteristic only. (ii) If exponential sums of easy to compute polynomials can be computed efficiently, then the same is true of exponential products. We point out an application of this result to the P=NP problem in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation over the field of complex numbers.Comment: 13 page

VPSPACE and a Transfer Theorem over the Reals

We introduce a new class VPSPACE of families of polynomials. Roughly speaking, a family of polynomials is in VPSPACE if its coefficients can be computed in polynomial space. Our main theorem is that if (uniform, constant-free) VPSPACE families can be evaluated efficiently then the class PAR of decision problems that can be solved in parallel polynomial time over the real numbers collapses to P. As a result, one must first be able to show that there are VPSPACE families which are hard to evaluate in order to separate over the reals P from NP, or even from PAR.Comment: Full version of the paper (appendices of the first version are now included in the text

VPSPACE and a transfer theorem over the complex field

We extend the transfer theorem of [KP2007] to the complex field. That is, we investigate the links between the class VPSPACE of families of polynomials and the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation over C. Roughly speaking, a family of polynomials is in VPSPACE if its coefficients can be computed in polynomial space. Our main result is that if (uniform, constant-free) VPSPACE families can be evaluated efficiently then the class PAR of decision problems that can be solved in parallel polynomial time over the complex field collapses to P. As a result, one must first be able to show that there are VPSPACE families which are hard to evaluate in order to separate P from NP over C, or even from PAR.Comment: 14 page

Symmetry of information and nonuniform lower bounds

12 pagesIn the first part we provide another proof of the result of [Homer, Mocas 1995] that for all constant c, the class EXP is not included in P/(n^c) . The proof is based on a simple diagonalization, whereas it uses resource-bounded Kolmogorov complexity in [Homer, Mocas 1995]. In the second part, we investigate links between resource-bounded Kolmogorov complexity and nonuniform classes in computational complexity. Assuming a version of polynomial-time symmetry of information, we show that exponential-time problems do not have polynomial-size circuits (in symbols, EXP is not included in P/poly)

A Superpolynomial Lower Bound on the Size of Uniform Non-constant-depth Threshold Circuits for the Permanent

We show that the permanent cannot be computed by DLOGTIME-uniform threshold or arithmetic circuits of depth o(log log n) and polynomial size.Comment: 11 page

Pushdown Compression

The pressing need for eficient compression schemes for XML documents has recently been focused on stack computation [6, 9], and in particular calls for a formulation of information-lossless stack or pushdown compressors that allows a formal analysis of their performance and a more ambitious use of the stack in XML compression, where so far it is mainly connected to parsing mechanisms. In this paper we introduce the model of pushdown compressor, based on pushdown transducers that compute a single injective function while keeping the widest generality regarding stack computation. The celebrated Lempel-Ziv algorithm LZ78 [10] was introduced as a general purpose compression algorithm that outperforms finite-state compressors on all sequences. We compare the performance of the Lempel-Ziv algorithm with that of the pushdown compressors, or compression algorithms that can be implemented with a pushdown transducer. This comparison is made without any a priori assumption on the data's source and considering the asymptotic compression ratio for infinite sequences. We prove that Lempel-Ziv is incomparable with pushdown compressors

A Superpolynomial Lower Bound on the Size of Uniform Non-constant-depth Threshold Circuits for the Permanent

11 pagesWe show that the permanent cannot be computed by DLOGTIME-uniform threshold or arithmetic circuits of depth o(log log n) and polynomial size

Cyclotomic Identity Testing and Applications

We consider the cyclotomic identity testing problem: given a polynomial $f(x_1,\ldots,x_k)$, decide whether $f(\zeta_n^{e_1},\ldots,\zeta_n^{e_k})$ is zero, for $\zeta_n = e^{2\pi i/n}$ a primitive complex $n$-th root of unity and integers $e_1,\ldots,e_k$. We assume that $n$ and $e_1,\ldots,e_k$ are represented in binary and consider several versions of the problem, according to the representation of $f$. For the case that $f$ is given by an algebraic circuit we give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm with two-sided errors, showing that the problem lies in BPP. In case $f$ is given by a circuit of polynomially bounded syntactic degree, we give a randomized algorithm with two-sided errors that runs in poly-logarithmic parallel time, showing that the problem lies in BPNC. In case $f$ is given by a depth-2 $\Sigma\Pi$ circuit (or, equivalently, as a list of monomials), we show that the cyclotomic identity testing problem lies in NC. Under the generalised Riemann hypothesis, we are able to extend this approach to obtain a polynomial-time algorithm also for a very simple subclass of depth-3 $\Sigma\Pi\Sigma$ circuits. We complement this last result by showing that for a more general class of depth-3 $\Sigma\Pi\Sigma$ circuits, a polynomial-time algorithm for the cyclotomic identity testing problem would yield a sub-exponential-time algorithm for polynomial identity testing. Finally, we use cyclotomic identity testing to give a new proof that equality of compressed strings, i.e., strings presented using context-free grammars, can be decided in coRNC: randomized NC with one-sided errors