2 research outputs found
The effect of riparian forest on landscape connectivity for the EPT community across European regions
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichop-
tera are three orders of freshwater macroinvertebrates
with a short terrestrial adult life-stage that they use
to disperse by flying upstream. This aerial dispersal
can be assisted by native riparian forest, but regional
variation has not yet been empirically tested. In
this study we compared the EPT community of 153
sampling sites located in freshwater streams in four
European regions (Central Plains, Central Highlands, Alps, Iberia). In each site, we assessed the EPT com-
munity dispersal ability using the Species Flying Pro-
pensity index. We also calculated the native decidu-
ous forest cover in the riparian buffer and several
environmental stressors such as saprobic pollution or
catchment anthropization. Finally, we tested which of
these parameters have a significant effect on the EPT
community. In the Central Highlands and in Iberia,
the share of weak dispersers increased with native
deciduous forest cover, indicating a positive effect on
dispersal of EPTs. In the Central Plains and the Alps,
no such effect was found. We conclude that the effect
of native deciduous forest depends on regional land-
scape characteristics and the regional species pool,
but considering the dispersal of the regional EPT
communities is needed to create effective river man-
agement policies.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
How far can EPTs fly? A comparison of empirical flying distances of riverine invertebrates and existing dispersal metrics
The species composition of a community is driven by the dispersal capacity of the species forming that community
and their ecological niche. While the ecological niches of EPTs (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera)
are well-studied due to their wide use as indicators for the ecological status of freshwater ecosystems,
their dispersal capacity has not yet been accurately characterized. Dispersion of the merolimnic EPT species
during the terrestrial aerial adult stage is of special importance because the distance dispersed by active flight or
passive wind drift is usually much larger compared to dispersion during the aquatic larval stage by active
crawling or by drifting downstream.
The aerial dispersal distance has been directly measured for only a small number of EPT species. For most
other species, the dispersal capacity is assessed indirectly using species’ traits that are mainly based on expert
judgement and dispersal indices derived from trait information. In this study, we compiled a database of European
EPTs’ aerial dispersal distances reported in empirical studies and compared them to the dispersal capacity
of the species as described by five different dispersal indices (original and modified versions of Li’s Dispersal
Capacity Metric DCM and Sarremejane’s Species Flying Propensity SFP as well as relative wing length).
The database included empirical data on 180 species, comprising 9.3% of European EPT species. Most data
came from trap experiments with traps located at different distances from the assumed emergence point. Since
the distance classes differed between studies and had to be translated to a fixed set of four distance classes here,
several species had to be assigned to more than one class. To account for this uncertainty, five ordered logistic
regression models, each one with a dispersal index as predictor and the ordinal-scaled aerial dispersal distance as
response, were bootstrapped 10,000 times. In each run, species belonging to several distance classes were
randomly assigned to a single class out of all possible classes. Since wing length had no significant effect on aerial
dispersal distance in any of the 10,000 bootstrap runs, we question the use of this anatomical trait as an indicator
for the aerial dispersal capacity. In contrast, a modified version of the DCM index was consistently related to the
aerial dispersal distances (96%). The original SFP index had a significant effect in 100% of the model runs,
indicating that this index is very well-suited as an indicator for the aerial dispersal capacity of European EPT
species.
This study facilitates the assessment of European EPT flying distances by providing a compilation of empirical
data on the topic and by recommending an accurate indirect method when empirical data is not availableinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio