6 research outputs found

    Cyclic voltammetry as a sensitive approach in investigation of doxorubicin

    Get PDF
    Introduction and objective Doxorubicin is an anthracycline drug. Its chemotherapeutic effect is due to two possible mechanisms, 1)disruption of topoisomerase-II-mediated DNA repair due to its intercalation into DNA helix and 2)generation of free radicals and their damage to cellular membranes, DNA, and proteins. This can be a result of its planar aromatic chromophore which intercalates between two base pairs of DNA [1]. Therefore, its pharmacological/toxicological characteristics are largely dependent on its oxidative properties, and the aim of this study is to summarize the methods and data based on its Π΅lectrochemical behavior of doxorubicin, obtained by the means of cyclic voltammetry (CV) [2]. Methods Cyclic voltammetry is a versatile electrochemical method where the redox reactions occurring at the working electrode result in a flow of current. The potentiostat measures this current and plots it as a function of the applied potential. Each successful forwards and backwards potential sweep produces a a cyclic voltammogram characterized by anodic and cathodic peak currents, peak potentials, and the oxidation and reduction onset potentials. Results Our research revealed several studies that feature the electrochemical behavior of doxorubicin. CV in pH~7.4 has shown that doxorubicin undergoes a reversible two-electron reduction with value E1/2 = -665 mV(versus Ag/AgCl, saturated KCl). This process was defined as quasi reversible, at low scan rates. Further, the interaction of doxorubicin hydrochloride with calf thymus DNA was studied by measuring cathodic peak current, which gradually decreased as more DNA was added into the cell [3]. The interaction of doxorubicin with calf thymus DNA, was mostly assessed by electrochemical sensors using surface modified working electrodes [4,5,6]. Electrochemical sensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified platinum electrode (Pt/MWCNTs) [4], electrodeposition of silver nanoparticles and electro-polymerization of alginate layers on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode have been also used in this purpose [5]. CV of doxorubicine on a screen-printed electrodes modified with single-wall carbon nanotubes (SPE/CNT) have shown linear dependence of the intensity of electro reduction/oxidation on the square root of the scan rate which proved that the process is a controlled by diffusion. Moreover, thay imployed differential pulse voltammetry to validate a sensitive method for doxorubicine quantification. The drug binding processes were examined by DPV via the registration of a decrease in peak current intensity of guanine, adenine, and thymine of DNA in the presence of doxorubicin [6]. Conclusion Cyclic voltammetry can be used as an efffective tool for quantification of doxorubicine and its interactions with DNA or other metals. Reverible oxidation of doxorubicin to semiquinone and back, releases reactive oxygen species that cause DNA damage and lipid peroxidation. The effectivness of the therapeutic effect of doxorubicine depends on its interaction with DNA. These interactions were mostly assessed by using an electrochemical surface modified sensor, in the presence of DNA. These data lead to a conclusion that electrochemical platforms represent a sensitive approach for the investigation of DNA–drug interaction in electrode systems. Examining the electrochemical signals doxorubicin or DNA–doxorubicin complex before and after binding establishes the interaction and helps in mechanism elucidation

    Clinically significant drug interactions of Eltrombopag: a retrospective study from the clinical pharmacist perspective

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Thrombopoietin is the main cytokine regulating megakaryopoiesis and platelet production. Eltrombopag interacts with the transmembrane domain of thrombopoietin receptors and initiates signaling cascades inducing proliferation and differentiation from bone marrow progenitor cells. The aim of the study was to determine drug interaction at patients that are receiving Eltrombopag along with other medications. Materials and methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted at the Hematology Clinic in Skopje, N. Macedonia. A clinical pharmacist, focusing on Eltrombopag and concomitant medications interactions, reviewed a total number of 16 patient’s histories for the period of 6 months (January-June 2023). Anamnestic data on additional drugs, herbal supplements, vitamins, minerals were also taken. Potential drug interactions were identified using Stockley's interactions checker, categorized by severity and subclassified into co-administered drugs altering pharmacokinetics. Results: A total number of 73 interactions were identified, of which 23 (31.51%) were with moderate clinical relevance, 14 (19.18%) were with no clinical importance and required counseling about possible adverse effects and additional monitoring. The rest of 36 (49,32%) interactions were without clinical significance. Additionally, we determine that 7 (9.59%) of total interactions directly related to patients receiving Eltrombopag (ciclosporin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, dexamethasone, prednisolone, valsartan, and magnesium) and categorized as moderate and needs close monitoring. Conclusion: This study demonstrates toxicity potential of Eltrombopag at patients associated with concomitant medicines. Close collaboration of physicians and clinical pharmacists is necessary in all cases where patients are receiving Eltrombopag along with other medications in order all significant interactions to be identified, prevented and managed

    Determination of non-adherence in patients receiving Eltrombopag

    Get PDF
    Eltrombopag, an orally administered thrombopoietin receptor agonist, selectively binds to the transmembrane domain of the thrombopoietin receptor on the surface of platelets, megakaryocytes and megakaryocyte precursor cells (1). The aim of our research is to determine patient non-adherence and its impact on the effectiveness and safety of prescribed therapy, as well as the possibility of treatment failure. The observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study was conducted in the PHO University Clinic of Hematology in Skopje, R.N.Macedonia. 17 patients (9 men and 8 women) were followed from January to August 2023. Five of them were with diagnose aplastic anemia and 12 with immune thrombocytopenia. All of them treated with Eltrombopag. We have systematically reviewed medical records from the Department of Hospital pharmacy, collected anamnestic data and determine non-adherence to therapy, followed by dose frequency, double taking therapy, omitted doses, drug-drug interactions and food/supplement-drug interactions. Thirteen types of non-adherence were identified, of which 3(23,08%) were related to dose frequency, 1(7,69 %) was related to double taking therapy, 5(38,46%) were related to the possibility of drug-drug interactions, 2(15,38%) with possibility for food/supplement-drug interactions and 2(15,38 %) were related with omitted doses. Failure to adherence is a serious problem which not only affects the patient but also the health care system. The clinical pharmacist intervention can improve patient adherencΠ΅, because the most important determinants effectiveness and safety are adherence to the prescribed therapy, multiple drug and food/supplement interactions which can vary on dose-response relationship, and risk of insufficient effectiveness of therapy (2)

    БСзбСдност Π½Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° пракса - ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ пристап Π΄ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Π»Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄

    Get PDF
    Π›Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄ Π΅ Π»Π΅ΠΊ кој посСдува антинСопластично, Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎ, проСритропоСтско ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ˜ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ° посСдува ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Ρ€Π°Π·Π΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ˜ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ. ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠΎΡ‚ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†Π΅Π²Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠˆΠ—Π£ УнивСрзитСтска ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π·Π° Ρ…Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π° - БкопјС Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π½ Π·Π° ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° процСсот Π½Π° Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ»Π°Π½Ρ†Π°. Π—Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ°, со Ρ†Π΅Π» ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° бСзбСдноста Π½Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅, Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° сС спровСдС ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Ρ‚Π°Π±Π»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄ ΠΎΠ΄ 5 mg. KΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ° Π·Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ‚ (ММР) Π·Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π°Ρ‚ овој Π»Π΅ΠΊ сС спровСдС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ пристап (CAP), спорСд која ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡˆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Π³ΠΎ Π²Ρ€ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚ исклучиво Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ сС Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ РСгистарот Π½Π° Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ€ΠΈ Π·Π° ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° брСмСност (PPP). Π‘ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ° сС водСшС Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠΆΠ° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ Π΄Π° Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ само Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΊΡƒ сС исполнСти Π±Π°Ρ€Π°ΡšΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΠΎΠ΄ PPP. Π‘ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ˜ΡœΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ сС ΠΈΠ·Π»Π°Ρ‡ΡƒΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ спСрмата, Π²ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ˜ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°ΡˆΠ΅ Π΄Π° Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ машка ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°. Π—Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Ρ‚Π°Π±Π»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄ 5 mg, PPP Π΅ спровСдСна кај 36 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ (23 ΠΌΠ°ΠΆΠΈ ΠΈ 13 ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈ), Π²ΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊ Π½Π° 18 мСсСци, Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π½ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ˜ΡœΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΠ²Ρ€ΠΈ 2021 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π’o овој ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ Π½Π° 14 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ со ΠΌΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Π½ ΠΌΠΈΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ‚Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ»Π΅ Π±Π°Ρ€Π΅ΠΌ Π΅Π΄Π½Π° линија Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π° (Π²ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° со дСксамСтазон), 22 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ со Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ ΠΌΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ΅Π½ ΠΌΠΈΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ кај ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π΅ спровСдСна Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ со дијагноза НС-Π₯ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ² Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ€Π΅Π½ Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΠΌ. Π‘ΠΎ Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ситС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡˆΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ PPP, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊ ΠΎΠ΄ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ˜ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ бСшС свСдСн Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠΌ

    Π’Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡˆΠΊΠΈ пристап Π²ΠΎ производството Π½Π° стандардизиран Скстракт ΠΎΠ΄ канабис Π±Π°Π·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ» (CBN) Π·Π° мСдицински Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΈ

    Get PDF
    ΠšΠ°Π½Π°Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‚ (CBN) сС Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ²Π° со Π΄Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ…ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ» (ВНБ), ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΎΠ΄ канабис Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π΅Π΅ΡšΠ΅. CBN Π΅ Π±Π»Π°Π³ психоактивСн ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ кој Π΄Π΅Π»ΡƒΠ²Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ слаб ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π΅Π½ агонист со Π°Ρ„ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ CB1 Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅. Π”ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈ сС Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ сСдативни, Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π»Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ˜ΡΡ‚Π²Π°. Π—Π° Π΄Π° сС ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅ стандардизиран Скстракт Π±Π°Π·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ Π½Π° CBN, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎ Π΅ Π΄Π° сС ΠΈΠ·Π²Ρ€ΡˆΠΈ присилна Π΄Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π·Π°Π±Ρ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π΅Π΅ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ВНБ, со Ρ†Π΅Π» Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΠ°Ρ“Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ CBN. Π—Π° Ρ‚Π°Π° Ρ†Π΅Π» бСшС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ процСс Π½Π° Π΄Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° ВНБ ΠΏΠΎ Π·Π°Π±Ρ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π΅Π΅ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ Скстракт со 32,8% (w/w) THC ΠΈ 7,4% (w/w) CBN ΠΈ послСдоватСлно Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ€Π½Π° Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, со Ρ†Π΅Π» ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° CBN. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ°, искористивмС Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ Скстракт ΠΎΠ΄ Glueberry OG кој бСшС ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅Π³Π½Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π·Π° Π·Π°Π±Ρ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π΅Π΅ΡšΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ Π΅Π΄Π½Π° Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°. ΠžΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡ„Π°ΡœΠ°Π°Ρ‚ процСси Π½Π° Π΄Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° висока Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ€Π½Π° Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π±Π΅Π° испитувани со помош Π½Π° HPLC ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ со UVΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€. По ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π° Π·Π°Π±Ρ€Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π΅Π΅ΡšΠ΅, Скстрактот содрТи 9,7% (w/w) ВНБ ΠΈ 36,2% (w/w) CBN. По Π΄Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Скстрактот, Π½Π΅ Π΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ ВНБ, Π° CBN сС Π·Π³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ» Π΄ΠΎ 43,1% (w/w). Π€ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ€Π½Π° Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° содрТи 55,8% (w/w) CBN. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΠΊΠ°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ° овој ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π½ Π·Π° добивањС Π½Π° Скстракти со Π·Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ принос Π½Π° CBN. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° Π²Ρ€Π· Скстрактот ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ лСсно Π΄Π° Π³ΠΎ оксидира THC Π²ΠΎ CBN. Оваа Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡƒΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π° Π½Π° гасови, кислород ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π·ΠΎΡ‚, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡƒΠ²Π°Ρ˜ΡœΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π·Π° Π±Π°Ρ€Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅ со гасови

    Monitoring the safety of nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

    Get PDF
    The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nilotinib administered to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) at patients. The study was conducted from March 2018 to May 2019 and it included 20 patients with CML in chronic phase. Of these 20 patients, 17 had previously been treated with imatinib and 3 with hydroxyurea. The mean duration of treatment with Nilotinib was 6.75 months. In nine patients treated with nilotinib (400 mg), 55% complained of fatigue, 33% of headache and 22.2% of pruritus. In five patients treated with Nilotinib (600 mg), 20% complained of headache, 40% of fatigue and 20% of pruritus. In addition, in six patients treated with nilotinib (800 mg), 50% complained of headache and fatigue, 17% with pruritus and visual disorder was observed in 20% of cases. In the study, the adverse reactions were observed between the age of 20 and 40 and it was 7.1%, in contrast to the group of patients between the age of 40 and 60 where the incidence of adverse reactions was 21.42%. The incidence of adverse reactions in patients in the age group over 60 years it was 57.1%. In terms of gender, the incidence of adverse reactions was equal to 50% for both men and women. In conclusion, this study showed that treatment with nilotinib was well tolerated, with adverse reactions of an easy degree. Future evaluation is necessary in order to understanding the adverse reaction of nilotinib in comparison with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Keywords: nilotinib, pharmacovigilance, safety, chronic myeloid leukemi
    corecore