10 research outputs found
A novel chemogenomics analysis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands: a potential strategy for receptor de-orphanization.
BACKGROUND: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a family of well-characterized drug targets with significant therapeutic value. Phylogenetic classifications may help to understand the characteristics of individual GPCRs and their subtypes. Previous phylogenetic classifications were all based on the sequences of receptors, adding only minor information about the ligand binding properties of the receptors. In this work, we compare a sequence-based classification of receptors to a ligand-based classification of the same group of receptors, and evaluate the potential to use sequence relatedness as a predictor for ligand interactions thus aiding the quest for ligands of orphan receptors. RESULTS: We present a classification of GPCRs that is purely based on their ligands, complementing sequence-based phylogenetic classifications of these receptors. Targets were hierarchically classified into phylogenetic trees, for both sequence space and ligand (substructure) space. The overall organization of the sequence-based tree and substructure-based tree was similar; in particular, the adenosine receptors cluster together as well as most peptide receptor subtypes (e.g. opioid, somatostatin) and adrenoceptor subtypes. In ligand space, the prostanoid and cannabinoid receptors are more distant from the other targets, whereas the tachykinin receptors, the oxytocin receptor, and serotonin receptors are closer to the other targets, which is indicative for ligand promiscuity. In 93% of the receptors studied, de-orphanization of a simulated orphan receptor using the ligands of related receptors performed better than random (AUC > 0.5) and for 35% of receptors de-orphanization performance was good (AUC > 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a phylogenetic classification of GPCRs that is solely based on the ligands of these receptors. The similarities and differences with traditional sequence-based classifications were investigated: our ligand-based classification uncovers relationships among GPCRs that are not apparent from the sequence-based classification. This will shed light on potential cross-reactivity of GPCR ligands and will aid the design of new ligands with the desired activity profiles. In addition, we linked the ligand-based classification with a ligand-focused sequence-based classification described in literature and proved the potential of this method for de-orphanization of GPCRs.RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are
Quantifying the shifts in physicochemical property space introduced by the metabolism of small organic molecules
RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are
Metabolite Identification Using Automated Comparison of High-Resolution Multistage Mass Spectral Trees
Multistage mass spectrometry (MS<sup><i>n</i></sup>)
generating so-called spectral trees is a powerful tool in the annotation
and structural elucidation of metabolites and is increasingly used
in the area of accurate mass LC/MS-based metabolomics to identify
unknown, but biologically relevant, compounds. As a consequence, there
is a growing need for computational tools specifically designed for
the processing and interpretation of MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> data. Here, we present a novel approach to represent and calculate
the similarity between high-resolution mass spectral fragmentation
trees. This approach can be used to query multiple-stage mass spectra
in MS spectral libraries. Additionally the method can be used to calculate
structure–spectrum correlations and potentially deduce substructures
from spectra of unknown compounds. The approach was tested using two
different spectral libraries composed of either human or plant metabolites
which currently contain 872 MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> spectra
acquired from 549 metabolites using Orbitrap FTMS<sup><i>n</i></sup>. For validation purposes, for 282 of these 549 metabolites,
765 additional replicate MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> spectra acquired
with the same instrument were used. Both the dereplication and de
novo identification functionalities of the comparison approach are
discussed. This novel MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> spectral processing
and comparison approach increases the probability to assign the correct
identity to an experimentally obtained fragmentation tree. Ultimately,
this tool may pave the way for constructing and populating large MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> spectral libraries that can be used for
searching and matching experimental MS<sup><i>n</i></sup> spectra for annotation and structural elucidation of unknown metabolites
detected in untargeted metabolomics studies
OMG: Open Molecule Generator
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Computer Assisted Structure Elucidation has been used for decades to discover the chemical structure of unknown compounds. In this work we introduce the first open source structure generator, Open Molecule Generator (OMG), which for a given elemental composition produces all non-isomorphic chemical structures that match that elemental composition. Furthermore, this structure generator can accept as additional input one or multiple non-overlapping prescribed substructures to drastically reduce the number of possible chemical structures. Being open source allows for customization and future extension of its functionality. OMG relies on a modified version of the Canonical Augmentation Path, which grows intermediate chemical structures by adding bonds and checks that at each step only unique molecules are produced. In order to benchmark the tool, we generated chemical structures for the elemental formulas and substructures of different metabolites and compared the results with a commercially available structure generator. The results obtained, i.e. the number of molecules generated, were identical for elemental compositions having only C, O and H. For elemental compositions containing C, O, H, N, P and S, OMG produces all the chemically valid molecules while the other generator produces more, yet chemically impossible, molecules. The chemical completeness of the OMG results comes at the expense of being slower than the commercial generator. In addition to being open source, OMG clearly showed the added value of constraining the solution space by using multiple prescribed substructures as input. We expect this structure generator to be useful in many fields, but to be especially of great importance for metabolomics, where identifying unknown metabolites is still a major bottleneck.</p