The Impact of Medical Education Fellowships on the Careers of Graduates

Learning Objective: Our objective was to explore the impact of medical education fellowship training on the careers of graduates.Background: Medical education fellowships in emergency medicine provide training in teaching, assessment, educational program administration, and scholarship. The longitudinal impact of this training is unknown.Objective: To explore the impact of medical education fellowships on the careers of graduates.Methods: We performed a qualitative study with a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm using semi-structured interviews. We used a purposeful randomized stratified sampling strategy of graduates to ensure diversity of representation (gender, region, fellowship duration, and career stage). Subjects were invited by email to participate in semi-structured video interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Two researchers independently analyzed the data using a modified grounded theory approach and resolved discrepancies through in-depth discussion. Inter-rater agreement was 93.7%.Results: The characteristics of the 10 participants are displayed in Table 1. Participants sought fellowship training because of their passion for education, for career preparation, and at the advice of mentors. Participants felt that fellowships provided formal training and important relationships in a supportive learning environment. Fellowship training gave fellows a community, helped them develop expertise, influenced their mindset and impacted careers in both the short and long term. Participants noted that fellowship enhanced their self-efficacy, broadened their educational world view, shaped their professional identity, validated their skill set, and prepared them for job tasks. Participants felt that fellowship increased their competitiveness in the job market, focused the direction of their career, helped develop their niche, and positively affected their career trajectory (Table 2).Conclusion: Fellowship training in medical education broadly influenced the short and long-term mindset and careers of graduates

Is it worth it? A qualitative analysis of the impact of medical education fellowships on careers.

OBJECTIVES: Medical education fellowships provide training in teaching, assessment, educational program administration, and scholarship. The longitudinal impact of this training is unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of medical education fellowships on the careers of graduates. METHODS: The authors performed a qualitative study with a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm using semistructured interviews in 2021. The authors used a purposeful randomized stratified sampling strategy of graduates to ensure diversity of representation (gender, region, fellowship duration, and career stage). Two researchers independently analyzed interview transcriptions using a modified grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 10 graduates and identified three overarching concepts: motivations for pursuing fellowship, benefits of training, and drivers of career development. Graduates sought training because of their desire for growth and career preparation and at the advice of mentors. Fellowships provided knowledge and skills in a structured learning environment, supported by mentors and a collaborative community. Fellowship training shaped the careers of graduates by increasing their self-efficacy, enhancing their outcome expectations, refining their goals, and influencing their professional identity formation. They acquired expertise that prepared them for jobs, developed credibility, felt competitive in the job market, anticipated successful promotion, reached for greater goals, broadened their educational worldview, and evolved their professional identity as a result of fellowship training. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship training in medical education provides knowledge and skills, a structured learning environment, and important relationships that shape the careers of graduates by impacting their self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goal creation, and professional identity formation

Stephen F. Austin University: An Anchor Institution in Deep East Texas, PRP 222

Beyond its big skies, natural beauty, and small-town feel, Deep East Texas is home to Stephen F. Austin University (SFA), a Tier 1 higher education institution. SFA is positioned as a strong talent and innovation hub for a region that is ready for an economic development plan that considers the changing regional dynamics and prioritizes regional collaboration, employment, talent retention, business attraction, industry innovation, and quality of life. The Deep East Texas (DET) region is experiencing the same challenges that many rural regions face today: a high poverty rate, low labor participation rates, lackluster job creation, insufficient industry diversification, brain drain (talent leaving the region for urban cities), and a lack of social inclusion. Deep East Texas looks to SFA, the regional public university, to be an active participant in addressing these trends and moving the economy toward resilience. In 2021, the Center for Applied Research and Rural Innovation (CARRI) was established to act as a bridge between the university and the community to address region-wide problems and further encourage collaboration. To fulfill its mission of supporting academic programs and boosting regional economic development, SFA partnered with the LBJ School of Public Affairs to build a plan that incorporates the strengths of the region and the potential of CARRI.Public Affair

Outcome assessment of medical education fellowships in emergency medicine.

ObjectivesMedical education fellowships in emergency medicine (EM) provide training in teaching, assessment, educational program administration, and scholarship. The longitudinal impact of this training is unknown. Our objective was to characterize the career outcomes of medical education fellowship graduates.MethodsWe solicited curriculum vitae (CV) from graduates of U.S. EM education fellowships by email. We abstracted data from CVs with a standard instrument that included program characteristics, employment history, leadership positions, awards, and scholarly productivity. We calculated and reported descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 71 of 91 (78%) graduates participated. Thirty-three completed a 1-year fellowship and 38 completed a 2-year fellowship. Nineteen (27%) completed an advanced degree during fellowship. Median (range) graduation year was 2016 (1997-2020). The majority, 63 of 71 (89%), work in an academic setting. Graduates held leadership positions in continuing medical education, graduate medical education, and undergraduate medical education. Forty-eight (68%) served on national medical education committees. The mean ± SD number of national medical education awards was 1.27 ± 2.03. The mean ± SD number of national medical education presentations was 7.63 ± 10.83. Graduates authored a mean ± SD of 3.63 ± 5.81 book chapters and a mean ± SD of 4.99 ± 6.17 peer-reviewed medical education research publications. Ten (14%) served on journal editorial boards, 34 (48%) were journal reviewers, and 31 (44%) had received a medical education grant.ConclusionEM medical education fellowship graduates are academically productive and hold education leadership positions

Teaching Endotracheal Intubation Using a Cadaver Versus a Manikin-based Model: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: The optimal method to train novice learners to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI)is unknown. The study objective was to compare two models: unembalmed cadaver vs simulationmanikin.Methods: Fourth-year medical students, stratified by baseline ETI experience, were randomized 1:1to train on a cadaver or simulation manikin. Students were tested and video recorded on a separatecadaver; two reviewers, blinded to the intervention, assessed the videos. Primary outcome wastime to successful ETI, analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Authors also comparedpercentage of glottic opening (POGO), number of ETI attempts, learner confidence, and satisfaction.Results: Of 97 students randomized, 78 were included in the final analysis. Median time to ETI didnot differ significantly (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.7-1.8): cadaver group =34.5 seconds (interquartile ratio [IQR]: 23.3-55.8) vs manikin group = 35.5 seconds (IQR: 23.8-80.5),with no difference in first-pass success (odds ratio [OR] = 1; 95% CI, 0.1-7.5) or median POGO: 80%cadaver vs 90% manikin (95% CI, -14-34%). Satisfaction was higher for cadavers (median difference= 0.5; p = 0.002; 95% CI, 0-1) as was change in student confidence (median difference = 0.5; p= 0.03; 95% CI, 0-1). Students rating their confidence a 5 (“extremely confident”) demonstrateddecreased time to ETI (HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.0-17.2).Conclusion: Manikin and cadaver training models for ETI produced similar time to ETI, POGO,and first-pass success. Cadaver training was associated with increased student satisfaction andconfidence; subjects with the highest confidence level demonstrated decreased time to ETI

Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders

BackgroundFree open-access medical education (FOAM) has become an integral resource for medical school and residency education. However, questions of quality and inconsistent coverage of core topics remain. In this second entry of the SAEM Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) series, we describe the application of a systematic methodology to identify, curate, and describe FOAM topics specific to endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders as defined by the 2016 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine (MCPEM).MethodsWe developed an automated algorithm to search 264 keywords derived from nine subtopics within the MCPEM category in the FOAM Search (a customized FOAM search tool) and the Social Media index. The top 100 results were extracted for each keyword. Resources underwent a manual iterative screening process, and those relevant to endocrine, metabolic, or nutritional disorders and EM were evaluated with the revised Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (rMETRIQ) tool.ResultsThe search yielded 36,346 resources, of which 756 met the criteria for quality assessment. After rMETRIQ tool training, four raters demonstrated an average measured intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 0.97, p < 0.001). A total of 121 posts (16% of posts) covering 25 subtopics were identified as high quality (rMETRIQ ≥16). The most covered subtopic was potassium disorders, representing 15% of all posts. Subtopics that did not have a high-quality resource identified include metabolic alkalosis, respiratory alkalosis, fluid overload, phosphorus metabolism, hyperglycemia, malabsorption, malnutrition, and thyroiditis. From most to least common, the overall target audience was junior resident (91%), PGY-1 resident (88%), senior resident (81%), clerk (64%), attending (50%), and preclerkship (9%).ConclusionsWe systematically identified, described, and curated FOAM resources for EM learners on the topic of endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders. A final list of high-quality resources can guide trainees, educator recommendations, and FOAM authors

A decade of faculty development for health professions educators: lessons learned from the Macy Faculty Scholars Program

Abstract Faculty development (FD) programs are critical for providing the knowledge and skills necessary to drive positive change in health professions education, but they take many forms to attain the program goals. The Macy Faculty Scholars Program (MFSP), created by the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation (JMJF) in 2010, intends to develop participants as leaders, scholars, teachers, and mentors. After a decade of implementation, an external review committee conducted a program evaluation to determine how well the program met its intended goals and defined options for ongoing improvement. The committee selected Stufflebeam’s CIPP (context, input, process, products) framework to guide the program evaluation. Context and input components were derived from the MFSP description and demographic data, respectively. Process and product components were obtained through a mixed-methods approach, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data obtained from participant survey responses, and curriculum vitae (CV). The evaluation found participants responded favorably to the program and demonstrated an overall increase in academic productivity, most pronounced during the two years of the program. Mentorship, community of practice, and protected time were cited as major strengths. Areas for improvement included: enhancing the diversity of program participants, program leaders and mentors across multiple sociodemographic domains; leveraging technology to strengthen the MFSP community of practice; and improving flexibility of the program. The program evaluation results provide evidence supporting ongoing investment in faculty educators and summarizes key strengths and areas for improvement to inform future FD efforts for both the MFSP and other FD programs