Comparison of role and project clarity and overall collaboration between groups.

Comparison of role and project clarity and overall collaboration between groups.</p

Comparison of perceived shared decision making between groups.

Comparison of perceived shared decision making between groups.</p

Summary of free-text survey responses.

Equitable global health partnerships are essential to promote innovative research and strengthen research capacity to address critical public health challenges, but how to optimally evaluate such collaborations is unclear. This was a sequential, multi-method study that utilized an electronic survey informed by the literature followed by semi-structured interviews to comprehensively evaluate the experience of participating in a global research-capacity building collaboration between Nepal and U.S. clinicians and investigators. De-identified quantitative survey were analyzed to calculate descriptive and summary statistics, along with crosstabs of each variable by group. Groups were defined based on country-of-origin and Chi Square statistics calculated to assess for statistically significant differences (p</div

Demographics of the survey sample, overall, and by country affiliation.

Demographics of the survey sample, overall, and by country affiliation.</p

Additional supporting quotes from semi-structured interviews.

Additional supporting quotes from semi-structured interviews.</p

Code map based on qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews.

Code map based on qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews.</p

Comparison of project sustainability and resources by group.

Comparison of project sustainability and resources by group.</p