SDSS J080434.20+510349.2: Eclipsing WZ Sge-Type Dwarf Nova with Multiple Rebrightenings

We observed the 2006 superoutburst of SDSS J080434.20+510349.2 during its plateau phase, rebrightening phase, and post-superoutburst final decline. We found that this object is a grazing eclipsing system with a period of 0.0590048(2) d. Well-defined eclipses were only observed during the late stage of the superoutburst plateau and the depth decreased during the subsequent stages. We determined the superhump period during the superoutburst plateau to be 0.059539(11) d, giving a fractional superhump excess of 0.90(2)%. During the rebrightening and post-superoutburst phases, persisting superhumps with periods longer than those of superhumps during the plateau phase: 0.059632(6) during the rebrightening phase and 0.05969(4) d during the final fading. This phenomenon is very well in line with the previously known long-period "late superhumps" in GW Lib, V455 And and WZ Sge. The amplitudes of orbital humps between different states of rebrightenings suggest that these humps do not arise from the classical hot spot, but are more likely a result of projection effect in a high-inclination system. There was no clear evidence for the enhanced hot spot during the rebrightening phase. We also studied previously reported "mini-outbursts" in the quiescent state and found evidence that superhumps were transiently excited during these mini-outbursts. The presence of grazing eclipses and distinct multiple rebrightenings in SDSS J080434.20+510349.2 would provide a unique opportunity to understanding the mechanism of rebrightenings in WZ Sge-type dwarf novae.Comment: 14 pages, 12 figures, PASJ accepte

OT J002656.6+284933 (CSS101212:002657+284933): An SU UMa-Type Dwarf Nova with Longest Superhump Period

We observed the 2016 outburst of OT J002656.6+284933 (CSS101212:002657+284933) and found that it has the longest recorded [0.13225(1) d in average] superhumps among SU UMa-type dwarf novae. The object is the third known SU UMa-type dwarf nova above the period gap. The outburst, however, was unlike ordinary long-period SU UMa-type dwarf novae in that it showed two post-outburst rebrightenings. It showed superhump evolution similar to short-period SU UMa-type dwarf novae. We could constrain the mass ratio to less than 0.15 (most likely between 0.10 and 0.15) by using superhump periods in the early and post-superoutburst stages. These results suggest the possibility that OT J002656.6+284933 has an anomalously undermassive secondary and it should have passed a different evolutionary track from the standard one.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in PASJ (Letters), Note added in proof has been added. Supplementary Information (si.pdf) is available in the source fil

Discovery of Negative Superhumps during a Superoutburst of January 2011 in ER Ursae Majoris

We report on a discovery of "negative" superhumps during the 2011 January superoutburst of ER UMa. During the superoutburst which started on 2011 January 16, we detected negative superhumps having a period of 0.062242(9) d, shorter than the orbital period by 2.2%. No evidence of positive superhumps was detected during this observation. This finding indicates that the disk exhibited retrograde precession during this superoutburst, contrary to all other known cases of superoutbursts. The duration of this superoutburst was shorter than those of ordinary superoutbursts and the intervals of normal outbursts were longer than ordinary ones. We suggest a possibility that such unusual outburst properties are likely a result of the disk tilt, which is supposed to be a cause of negative superhumps: the tilted disk could prevent the disk from being filled with materials in the outmost region which is supposed to be responsible for long-duration superoutbursts in ER UMa-type dwarf novae. The discovery signifies the importance of the classical prograde precession in sustaining long-duration superoutbursts. Furthermore, the presence of pronounced negative superhumps in this system with a high mass-transfer rate favors the hypothesis that hydrodynamical lift is the cause of the disk tilt.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures, Accepted for publication in PASJ Lette