Comparison of Dual- and Single-Source Dual-Energy CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Regarding Image Quality and Radiation Dose

Hintergrund: Die CT-Pulmonalisangiographie (CTPA) ist diagnostischer Goldstandard der Diagnostik der Lungenarterienembolie (LAE). Durch Dual-Energy CT (DECT) können mithilfe von Joddistributionskarten LAEs auf Segment- und Subsegmentebene besser detektiert werden. Neben der etablierten Dual-Source-Technik ermöglicht ein Split-Filter eine DECT-Akquisition mit Single-Source-Scannern. Ein solcher SF-DECT-Scanner sollte hinsichtlich der Bildqualität sowie der Strahlendosis mit einem etabliertem DS-DECT-Gerät verglichen werden. Material und Methoden: Insgesamt wurden 135 Patienten eingeschlossen, die eine CTPA erhielten: 68 erhielten einen DS-DECT-Scan mit 90/Sn150 kV und 67 einen SF-DECT-Scan mit Au/Sn120 kV. Für beide Protokolle wurden farbkodierte Joddistributionskarten erstellt. Die objektive (CT-Abschwächung in relevanten Gefäßen in HU, Signal-Rausch-Verhältnis (SNR), Kontrast-Rausch-Verhältnis (CNR), perfused blood volume (PBV)) und subjektive Bildqualität (2 Befunder (B), 5-Punkte-Likert-Skala) sowie Dosisparameter wurden erhoben und verglichen. Ergebnisse: Alle CTPAs waren von diagnostischer Qualität. Ihre subjektive Bildqualität wurde in 80,9/82,4% (B1/B2) der DS-DECT und in 77,6/76,1% der SF-DECT als exzellent oder gut bewertet. Die subjektive Bildqualität der Joddistributionskarten der SF-DECT wurde von beiden Befundern als schlechter beurteilt. Die HU-Werte der relevanten Gefäße unterschieden sich nicht signifikant (p>0.05), SNR und CNR der SF-Gruppe waren in zentralen Gefäßen jedoch höher (p<0.05); die PBV-Werte der SF-Gruppe waren teils höher (p<0.05). Alle erhobenen Dosisparameter waren in der SF-Gruppe höher (p<0,05). Konklusion: In der diagnostischen Abklärung eines V.a. eine akute LAE ermöglicht der Einsatz eines Split-Filters an einem Single-Source-CT-Scanner eine Dual-Energy-Untersuchung. Dies geht im Vergleich zu etablierten DS-Scannern jedoch mit einer schlechteren Qualität der Joddistributionskarten und einer höheren Strahlendosis einher.Background: CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has established as reference standard in the diagnostic workup of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). With dual-energy CT (DECT), iodine maps can help to detect segmental and subsegmental PEs. Next to established dual-source techniques, the use of a split-filter enables DECT acquisition with single-source scanners. This study compared a SF-DECT scanner with an established DS-DECT scanner with regard to image quality and radiation dose. Material and Methods: A total of 135 patients receiving a CTPA were included: 68 received a DS-DECT scan with 90/Sn 150 kV and 67 received a SF-DECT scan with Au/Sn 120 kV. Color-coded iodine-distribution maps were reconstructed for both protocols. Objective (CT attenuation in relevant vessels in HU, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), perfused blood volume (PBV)) and subjective image quality (2 readers (R), 5-point Likert scale) as well as radiation dose parameters were documented and compared. Results: All CTPAs were of diagnostic image quality. Subjective image quality was rated as excellent or good in 80,9/82,4% (R1/R2) of DS-DECT scans and in 77,6/76,1% of SF-DECT scans. Subjective image quality of iodine maps of SF-DECT scans was rated lower by both readers. For objective image quality, CT attenuation in HU of relevant vessels did not differ significantly (p>0.05), while SNR and CNR of central vessels in the SF-collective were significantly higher (p<0.05); some PBV-values of the SF-collective were significantly higher (p<0.05). All assessed radiation dose parameters were significantly higher in the SF-collective (p<0.05). Conclusion: In the diagnostic workup of suspected PE the use of a split-filter enables dual-energy acquisition with a single-source CT scanner. However, this is associated with a lower image quality of iodine maps and a higher radiation dose compared to established DS scanners

Virtual non-iodine photon-counting CT-angiography for aortic valve calcification scoring

Abstract Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT allows for reconstruction of virtual non-iodine (VNI) images from contrast-enhanced datasets. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of aortic valve calcification scoring (AVCS) derived from VNI datasets generated with a 1st generation clinical dual-source PCD-CT. AVCS was evaluated in 123 patients (statistical analysis only comprising patients with aortic valve calcifications [n = 56; 63.2 ± 11.6 years]), who underwent contrast enhanced electrocardiogram-gated (either prospective or retrospective or both) cardiac CT on a clinical PCD system. Patient data was reconstructed at 70 keV employing a VNI reconstruction algorithm. True non-contrast (TNC) scans at 70 keV without quantum iterative reconstruction served as reference in all individuals. Subgroup analysis was performed in 17 patients who received both, prospectively and retrospectively gated contrast enhanced scans (n = 8 with aortic valve calcifications). VNI images with prospective/retrospective gating had an overall sensitivity of 69.2%/56.0%, specificity of 100%/100%, accuracy of 85.4%/81.0%, positive predictive value of 100%/100%, and a negative predictive value of 78.2%/75.0%. VNI images with retrospective gating achieved similar results. For both gating approaches, AVCSVNI showed high correlation (r = 0.983, P < 0.001 for prospective; r = 0.986, P < 0.001 for retrospective) with AVCSTNC. Subgroup analyses demonstrated excellent intra-individual correlation between different acquisition modes (r = 0.986, P < 0.001). Thus, VNI images derived from cardiac PCD-CT allow for excellent diagnostic performance in the assessment of AVCS, suggesting potential for the omission of true non-contrast scans in the clinical workup of patients with aortic calcifications

An intra-individual comparison of low-keV photon-counting CT versus energy-integrating-detector CT angiography of the aorta

This retrospective study aims to provide an intra-individual comparison of aortic CT angiographies (CTAs) using first-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and third-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). High-pitch CTAs were performed with both scanners and equal contrast-agent protocols. EID-CT employed automatic tube voltage selection (90/100 kVp) with reference tube current of 434/350 mAs, whereas multi-energy PCD-CT scans were generated with fixed tube voltage (120 kVp), image quality level of 64, and reconstructed as 55 keV monoenergetic images. For image quality assessment, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated, and subjective evaluation (overall quality, luminal contrast, vessel sharpness, blooming, and beam hardening) was performed independently by three radiologists. Fifty-seven patients (12 women, 45 men) were included with a median interval between examinations of 12.7 months (interquartile range 11.1 months). Using manufacturer-recommended scan protocols resulted in a substantially lower radiation dose in PCD-CT (size-specific dose estimate: 4.88 ± 0.48 versus 6.28 ± 0.50 mGy, p < 0.001), while CNR was approximately 50% higher (41.11 ± 8.68 versus 27.05 ± 6.73, p < 0.001). Overall image quality and luminal contrast were deemed superior in PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Notably, EID-CT allowed for comparable vessel sharpness (p = 0.439) and less pronounced blooming and beam hardening (p < 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (0.58–0.87). Concluding, aortic PCD-CTAs facilitate increased image quality with significantly lower radiation dose compared to EID-CTA

Potential of Unenhanced Ultra-Low-Dose Abdominal Photon-Counting CT with Tin Filtration: A Cadaveric Study

Objectives: This study investigated the feasibility and image quality of ultra-low-dose unenhanced abdominal CT using photon-counting detector technology and tin prefiltration. Materials and Methods: Employing a first-generation photon-counting CT scanner, eight cadaveric specimens were examined both with tin prefiltration (Sn 100 kVp) and polychromatic (120 kVp) scan protocols matched for radiation dose at three different levels: standard-dose (3 mGy), low-dose (1 mGy) and ultra-low-dose (0.5 mGy). Image quality was evaluated quantitatively by means of contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) with regions of interest placed in the renal cortex and subcutaneous fat. Additionally, three independent radiologists performed subjective evaluation of image quality. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated as a measure of interrater reliability. Results: Irrespective of scan mode, CNR in the renal cortex decreased with lower radiation dose. Despite similar mean energy of the applied x-ray spectrum, CNR was superior for Sn 100 kVp over 120 kVp at standard-dose (17.75 &plusmn; 3.51 vs. 14.13 &plusmn; 4.02), low-dose (13.99 &plusmn; 2.6 vs. 10.68 &plusmn; 2.17) and ultra-low-dose levels (8.88 &plusmn; 2.01 vs. 11.06 &plusmn; 1.74) (all p &le; 0.05). Subjective image quality was highest for both standard-dose protocols (score 5; interquartile range 5&ndash;5). While no difference was ascertained between Sn 100 kVp and 120 kVp examinations at standard and low-dose levels, the subjective image quality of tin-filtered scans was superior to 120 kVp with ultra-low radiation dose (p &lt; 0.05). An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.844 (95% confidence interval 0.763&ndash;0.906; p &lt; 0.001) indicated good interrater reliability. Conclusions: Photon-counting detector CT permits excellent image quality in unenhanced abdominal CT with very low radiation dose. Employment of tin prefiltration at 100 kVp instead of polychromatic imaging at 120 kVp increases the image quality even further in the ultra-low-dose range of 0.5 mGy

Ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT in cadaveric fracture models: spatial frequency is not everything

In this study, the impact of reconstruction sharpness on the visualization of the appendicular skeleton in ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) CT was investigated. Sixteen cadaveric extremities (eight fractured) were examined with a standardized 120 kVp scan protocol (CTDI$_{vol}$ 10 mGy). Images were reconstructed with the sharpest non-UHR kernel (Br76) and all available UHR kernels (Br80 to Br96). Seven radiologists evaluated image quality and fracture assessability. Interrater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. For quantitative comparisons, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs) were calculated. Subjective image quality was best for Br84 (median 1, interquartile range 1–3; p ≤ 0.003). Regarding fracture assessability, no significant difference was ascertained between Br76, Br80 and Br84 (p > 0.999), with inferior ratings for all sharper kernels (p 0.999). Br76 and Br80 produced higher SNRs than all kernels sharper than Br84 (p ≤ 0.026). In conclusion, PCD-CT reconstructions with a moderate UHR kernel offer superior image quality for visualizing the appendicular skeleton. Fracture assessability benefits from sharp non-UHR and moderate UHR kernels, while ultra-sharp reconstructions incur augmented image noise

Quantitative and qualitative image quality assessment in shoulder examinations with a first-generation photon-counting detector CT

Abstract Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT allows for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) examinations of the shoulder without requiring an additional post-patient comb filter to narrow the detector aperture. This study was designed to compare the PCD performance with a high-end energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Sixteen cadaveric shoulders were examined with both scanners using dose-matched 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-dose/full-dose: CTDIvol = 5.0/10.0 mGy). Specimens were scanned in UHR mode with the PCD-CT, whereas EID-CT examinations were conducted in accordance with the clinical standard as “non-UHR”. Reconstruction of EID data employed the sharpest kernel available for standard-resolution scans (ρ50 = 12.3 lp/cm), while PCD data were reconstructed with both a comparable kernel (11.8 lp/cm) and a sharper dedicated bone kernel (16.5 lp/cm). Six radiologists with 2–9 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging rated image quality subjectively. Interrater agreement was analyzed by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient in a two-way random effects model. Quantitative analyses comprised noise recording and calculating signal-to-noise ratios based on attenuation measurements in bone and soft tissue. Subjective image quality was higher in UHR-PCD-CT than in EID-CT and non-UHR-PCD-CT datasets (all p  0.99). Interrater reliability was moderate, indicated by a single measures intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.73; p < 0.001). Image noise was lowest and signal-to-noise ratios were highest in non-UHR-PCD-CT reconstructions at either dose level (p < 0.001). This investigation demonstrates that superior depiction of trabecular microstructure and considerable denoising can be realized without additional radiation dose by employing a PCD for shoulder CT imaging. Allowing for UHR scans without dose penalty, PCD-CT appears as a promising alternative to EID-CT for shoulder trauma assessment in clinical routine

Potential of Unenhanced Ultra-Low-Dose Abdominal Photon-Counting CT with Tin Filtration: A Cadaveric Study

Objectives: This study investigated the feasibility and image quality of ultra-low-dose unenhanced abdominal CT using photon-counting detector technology and tin prefiltration. Materials and Methods: Employing a first-generation photon-counting CT scanner, eight cadaveric specimens were examined both with tin prefiltration (Sn 100 kVp) and polychromatic (120 kVp) scan protocols matched for radiation dose at three different levels: standard-dose (3 mGy), low-dose (1 mGy) and ultra-low-dose (0.5 mGy). Image quality was evaluated quantitatively by means of contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) with regions of interest placed in the renal cortex and subcutaneous fat. Additionally, three independent radiologists performed subjective evaluation of image quality. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated as a measure of interrater reliability. Results: Irrespective of scan mode, CNR in the renal cortex decreased with lower radiation dose. Despite similar mean energy of the applied x-ray spectrum, CNR was superior for Sn 100 kVp over 120 kVp at standard-dose (17.75 ± 3.51 vs. 14.13 ± 4.02), low-dose (13.99 ± 2.6 vs. 10.68 ± 2.17) and ultra-low-dose levels (8.88 ± 2.01 vs. 11.06 ± 1.74) (all p ≤ 0.05). Subjective image quality was highest for both standard-dose protocols (score 5; interquartile range 5–5). While no difference was ascertained between Sn 100 kVp and 120 kVp examinations at standard and low-dose levels, the subjective image quality of tin-filtered scans was superior to 120 kVp with ultra-low radiation dose (p p < 0.001) indicated good interrater reliability. Conclusions: Photon-counting detector CT permits excellent image quality in unenhanced abdominal CT with very low radiation dose. Employment of tin prefiltration at 100 kVp instead of polychromatic imaging at 120 kVp increases the image quality even further in the ultra-low-dose range of 0.5 mGy

Influence of spectral shaping and tube voltage modulation in ultralow-dose computed tomography of the abdomen

Abstract Purpose Unenhanced abdominal CT constitutes the diagnostic standard of care in suspected urolithiasis. Aiming to identify potential for radiation dose reduction in this frequent imaging task, this experimental study compares the effect of spectral shaping and tube voltage modulation on image quality. Methods Using a third-generation dual-source CT, eight cadaveric specimens were scanned with varying tube voltage settings with and without tin filter application (Sn 150, Sn 100, 120, 100, and 80 kVp) at three dose levels (3 mGy: standard; 1 mGy: low; 0.5 mGy: ultralow). Image quality was assessed quantitatively by calculation of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for various tissues (spleen, kidney, trabecular bone, fat) and subjectively by three independent radiologists based on a seven-point rating scale (7 = excellent; 1 = very poor). Results Irrespective of dose level, Sn 100 kVp resulted in the highest SNR of all tube voltage settings. In direct comparison to Sn 150 kVp, superior SNR was ascertained for spleen (p ≤ 0.004) and kidney tissue (p ≤ 0.009). In ultralow-dose scans, subjective image quality of Sn 100 kVp (median score 3; interquartile range 3–3) was higher compared with conventional imaging at 120 kVp (2; 2–2), 100 kVp (1; 1–2), and 80 kVp (1; 1–1) (all p < 0.001). Indicated by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945 (95% confidence interval: 0.927–0.960), interrater reliability was excellent. Conclusions In abdominal CT with maximised dose reduction, tin prefiltration at 100 kVp allows for superior image quality over Sn 150 kVp and conventional imaging without spectral shaping

Comparison of ultrahigh and standard resolution photon-counting CT angiography of the femoral arteries in a continuously perfused in vitro model

Abstract Background With the emergence of photon-counting CT, ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) imaging can be performed without dose penalty. This study aims to directly compare the image quality of UHR and standard resolution (SR) scan mode in femoral artery angiographies. Methods After establishing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens, photon-counting CT angiographies were performed with a radiation dose of 5 mGy and tube voltage of 120 kV in both SR and UHR mode. Images were reconstructed with dedicated convolution kernels (soft: Body-vascular (Bv)48; sharp: Bv60; ultrasharp: Bv76). Six radiologists evaluated the image quality by means of a pairwise forced-choice comparison tool. Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) was calculated to quantify interrater agreement. Image quality was further assessed by measuring intraluminal attenuation and image noise as well as by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Results UHR yielded lower noise than SR for identical reconstructions with kernels ≥ Bv60 (p < 0.001). UHR scans exhibited lower intraluminal attenuation compared to SR (Bv60: 406.4 ± 25.1 versus 418.1 ± 30.1 HU; p < 0.001). Irrespective of scan mode, SNR and CNR decreased while noise increased with sharper kernels but UHR scans were objectively superior to SR nonetheless (Bv60: SNR 25.9 ± 6.4 versus 20.9 ± 5.3; CNR 22.7 ± 5.8 versus 18.4 ± 4.8; p < 0.001). Notably, UHR scans were preferred in subjective assessment when images were reconstructed with the ultrasharp Bv76 kernel, whereas SR was rated superior for Bv60. Interrater agreement was high (W = 0.935). Conclusions Combinations of UHR scan mode and ultrasharp convolution kernel are able to exploit the full image quality potential in photon-counting CT angiography of the femoral arteries. Relevance statement The UHR scan mode offers improved image quality and may increase diagnostic accuracy in CT angiography of the peripheral arterial runoff when optimized reconstruction parameters are chosen. Key points • UHR photon-counting CT improves image quality in combination with ultrasharp convolution kernels. • UHR datasets display lower image noise compared with identically reconstructed standard resolution scans. • Scans in UHR mode show decreased intraluminal attenuation compared with standard resolution imaging. Graphical Abstrac

Standardized assessment of vascular reconstruction kernels in photon-counting CT angiographies of the leg using a continuous extracorporeal perfusion model

Abstract This study evaluated the influence of different vascular reconstruction kernels on the image quality of CT angiographies of the lower extremity runoff using a 1st-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) compared with dose-matched examinations on a 3rd-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). Inducing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in a human cadaveric model, we performed CT angiographies of eight upper leg arterial runoffs with radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (CTDIvol 5 mGy). Reconstructions were executed with different vascular kernels, matching the individual modulation transfer functions between scanners. Signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were computed to assess objective image quality. Six radiologists evaluated image quality subjectively using a forced-choice pairwise comparison tool. Interrater agreement was determined by calculating Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W). The intraluminal attenuation of PCD-CT images was significantly higher than of EID-CT (414.7 ± 27.3 HU vs. 329.3 ± 24.5 HU; p < 0.001). Using comparable kernels, image noise with PCD-CT was significantly lower than with EID-CT (p ≤ 0.044). Correspondingly, SNR and CNR were approximately twofold higher for PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Increasing the spatial frequency for PCD-CT reconstructions by one level resulted in similar metrics compared to EID-CT (CNRfat; EID-CT Bv49: 21.7 ± 3.7 versus PCD-CT Bv60: 21.4 ± 3.5). Overall image quality of PCD-CTA achieved ratings superior to EID-CTA irrespective of the used reconstruction kernels (best: PCD-CT Bv60; worst: EID-CT Bv40; p < 0.001). Interrater agreement was good (W = 0.78). Concluding, PCD-CT offers superior intraluminal attenuation, SNR, and CNR compared to EID-CT in angiographies of the upper leg arterial runoff. Combined with improved subjective image quality, PCD-CT facilitates the use of sharper convolution kernels and ultimately bears the potential of improved vascular structure assessability