5 research outputs found
Endpoint IgG binding titer.
<p>The antigen-specific IgG titer was measured by ELISA. Antiserum (terminal time point) was serially diluted (2-fold) and the endpoint titer was defined as the last dilution that gave a positive signal (>3-fold signal of the prebleeds). Animals that received the FCA/FIA (groups 1 and 2) or combination of Carbopol-971P and MF59 have significantly higher endpoint IgG titers than others (p<0.05).</p
gp140<sub>SF162</sub> conformation upon formulation with adjuvant.
<p>The gp140<sub>SF162</sub> glycoprotein was formulated with or without adjuvants and assayed on PAGE gel for conformation. (a) Regardless of presence or absence of adjuvants, a single band at 140 kDa was observed in the reduced gel. (b) Similar observation was made in the non-reduced gel, where all the samples showed two bands at 140 kDa and 280 kDa, representing the non-crosslinked and disulfide crosslinked gp140 trimers, respectively. (c) A BN-PAGE gel was used to examine the native conformation of gp140 in the presence of adjuvants. None of the adjuvants appear to affect the structure of gp140.</p
Relative avidity index.
<p>Avidity of the antiserum was measured by its ability to remain in binding with gp140<sub>SF162</sub> in the presence of 8 M Urea. All samples were found to have relative high avidity, defined as >50% IgG binding in the presence of 8 M Urea, as compared to the no Urea control. Compared to the unadjuvanted group (no. 12), antisera from animals vaccinated with adjuvants have significantly higher RAI (p<0.05).</p
Monoclonal antibody binding to gp140<sub>SF162</sub> in the presence of adjuvant.
<p>The antigenicity of gp140<sub>SF162</sub> in the presence of adjuvants was measured by mAb binding. A panel of 12 different mAbs, representing different epitope domains of the Env, was used. The signal of mAb binding to the adjuvant-formulated gp140<sub>SF162</sub> was calculated relative to the signal measured in the unadjuvanted sample, which is assigned to have the value of 1. The data is color coded: Yellow represents no difference in mAb binding, or no change of antigenicity as compared to the unadjuvanted sample and light blue represents up to 3-fold decrease of mAb binding (or antigenicity). Both FIA and MF59 adjuvants appeared to have little effect on antigenicity, as mAb binding was very similar to the unadjuvanted sample. On the other hand, decreased mAb bindings were detected in the presence of both of the Carbopols.</p
Table_1_Immunological insights into COVID-19 in Southern Nigeria.docx
IntroductionOne of the unexpected outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic was the relatively low levels of morbidity and mortality in Africa compared to the rest of the world. Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation, accounted for less than 0.01% of the global COVID-19 fatalities. The factors responsible for Nigeria's relatively low loss of life due to COVID-19 are unknown. Also, the correlates of protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and the impact of pre-existing immunity on the outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa are yet to be elucidated. Here, we evaluated the natural and vaccine-induced immune responses from vaccinated, non-vaccinated and convalescent individuals in Southern Nigeria throughout the three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. We also examined the pre-existing immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 from samples collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe used spike RBD and N- IgG antibody ELISA to measure binding antibody responses, SARS-CoV-2 pseudotype assay protocol expressing the spike protein of different variants (D614G, Delta, Beta, Omicron BA1) to measure neutralizing antibody responses and nucleoprotein (N) and spike (S1, S2) direct ex vivo interferon gamma (IFNγ) T cell ELISpot to measure T cell responses. ResultOur study demonstrated a similar magnitude of both binding (N-IgG (74% and 62%), S-RBD IgG (70% and 53%) and neutralizing (D614G (49% and 29%), Delta (56% and 47%), Beta (48% and 24%), Omicron BA1 (41% and 21%)) antibody responses from symptomatic and asymptomatic survivors in Nigeria. A similar magnitude was also seen among vaccinated participants. Interestingly, we revealed the presence of preexisting binding antibodies (N-IgG (60%) and S-RBD IgG (44%)) but no neutralizing antibodies from samples collected prior to the pandemic. DiscussionThese findings revealed that both vaccinated, non-vaccinated and convalescent individuals in Southern Nigeria make similar magnitude of both binding and cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses. It supported the presence of preexisting binding antibody responses among some Nigerians prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, hybrid immunity and heterologous vaccine boosting induced the strongest binding and broadly neutralizing antibody responses compared to vaccine or infection-acquired immunity alone.</p