10 research outputs found

    Stability of anti-streptococcal antibodies status across time.

    No full text
    <p>1118 individuals had 2 subsequent visits in a 4-year interval. Results in the second visit are stratified by the first visit results.</p><p>*Negative for both human PDI and Bovine PDI;</p>†<p>Positive for bovine PDI and/or human PDI.</p

    Design and Validation of a Periodic Leg Movement Detector

    No full text
    <div><p>Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs) are episodic, involuntary movements caused by fairly specific muscle contractions that occur during sleep and can be scored during nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG). Because leg movements (LM) may be accompanied by an arousal or sleep fragmentation, a high PLM index (i.e. average number of PLMs per hour) may have an effect on an individual’s overall health and wellbeing. This study presents the design and validation of the Stanford PLM automatic detector (S-PLMAD), a robust, automated leg movement detector to score PLM. NPSG studies from adult participants of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort (WSC, n = 1,073, 2000–2004) and successive Stanford Sleep Cohort (SSC) patients (n = 760, 1999–2007) undergoing baseline NPSG were used in the design and validation of this study. The scoring algorithm of the S-PLMAD was initially based on the 2007 American Association of Sleep Medicine clinical scoring rules. It was first tested against other published algorithms using manually scored LM in the WSC. Rules were then modified to accommodate baseline noise and electrocardiography interference and to better exclude LM adjacent to respiratory events. The S-PLMAD incorporates adaptive noise cancelling of cardiac interference and noise-floor adjustable detection thresholds, removes LM secondary to sleep disordered breathing within 5 sec of respiratory events, and is robust to transient artifacts. Furthermore, it provides PLM indices for sleep (PLMS) and wake plus periodicity index and other metrics. To validate the final S-PLMAD, experts visually scored 78 studies in normal sleepers and patients with restless legs syndrome, sleep disordered breathing, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, narcolepsy-cataplexy, insomnia, and delayed sleep phase syndrome. PLM indices were highly correlated between expert, visually scored PLMS and automatic scorings (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.94 in WSC and r<sup>2</sup> = 0.94 in SSC). In conclusion, The S-PLMAD is a robust and high throughput PLM detector that functions well in controls and sleep disorder patients.</p></div

    Leg EMG activity time locked to manually scored WSC respiratory events.

    No full text
    <p>Expected mean and median absolute leg EMG voltage is calculated in 0.5 s increments starting 30 s prior until 30 s after respiratory event onset (left figure) and each respiratory event offset (right figure). Respiratory events followed by wake, less than 15 s in duration, or which fall within 30 s of another event are removed. Leg EMG activity increases and then decreases prior to respiratory onset with a peak 4.5 s prior to onset, and later decreases before and increases after respiratory offset with a mean peak 2.5 s and median peak 3.5 s.</p

    Gold standard PLMI evalution.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of PLMI derived from manual scoring (y-axis) and our automatic PLM calculator using SNR+ (x-axis) in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort (upper figure, n = 60) and from the Stanford Sleep Clinic (lower figure, n = 18). Below each figure is a zoomed-in view of PLMI scores less than 5.</p

    Stanford Sleep Cohort (SSC).

    No full text
    <p>Data are mean ± Standard Error Mean, or percentage. The number of subject used for calculations are shown in parentheses if different from the total. For abbreviations, see legend to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0114565#pone-0114565-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p><p>Stanford Sleep Cohort (SSC).</p

    PLMS/h comparisons between automatic methods and manually scoring.

    No full text
    <p>The squared correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) between PLMS/h determined automatically versus manually is shown in the table for previously published detectors and our PLM calculator with and without the SNR+ option. PLM are classified according to AASM 2007 scoring criteria<sup>a</sup> with adjustment to LM classification for our classifier as described in the text.</p><p>*RLS symptoms as defined in the text.</p>a<p>Iber C A-IS, Chesson A, Quan SF. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Westchester, Ill: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2007.</p>b<p>Tauchmann NPT. Automatic Detection of Periodic Leg Movements. J Sleep Res 1996; 5(4): 273–5.</p>c<p>Wetter TC, Dirlich G, Streit J, Trenkwalder C, Schuld A, Pollmacher T. An automatic method for scoring leg movements in polygraphic sleep recordings and its validity in comparison to visual scoring. Sleep 2004; 27(2): 324–8.</p>d<p>Ferri R, Zucconi M, Manconi M, et al. Computer-assisted detection of nocturnal leg motor activity in patients with restless legs syndrome and periodic leg movements during sleep. Sleep 2005; 28(8): 998–1004.</p><p>PLMS/h comparisons between automatic methods and manually scoring.</p

    Coasting Skipper

    No full text
    coastingGeorge, son of John - Fish Culler Son of John- Coasting SkipperPRINTED ITEM DNE-cit DEC 1974 W. J. KIRWIN JH DEC 1974Used I and SupUsed I2Used I~ schooner, ~ trade, ~ vessel, coasting crew, coasting skipper, coasting trip, coasting voyageChecked by Jordyn Hughes on Fri 10 Jun 201

    Automatically obtained PLM biomarkers in Wisconsin Sleep Cohort.

    No full text
    <p>PLM metrics are calculated from PLM classified using our detector (SNR+). PLM/h and periodicity indices are calculated for wake (PLMW/h) and sleep (PLMS/h). Patients not using CPAP and having more two hours of evaluation were grouped according to their apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). CPAP users are not excluded from the “All” category. An hour of the night effect is seen with PLM, occurring almost five times as frequently in the first half of the night compared to the second half (PLM night ratio), while leg movement activity occurs equally across the night in patients with respiratory difficulty during sleep. Note that the periodicity index is artificially affected by excluding intermittent wake and produces a statistically significant higher value in patients with AHI≤15 when examining sleep only.</p><p>Data are mean ± Standard Error Mean, or percentage. The number of subject used for calculations are shown in parentheses. Periodicity is the periodicity index. Count is the total number of individual PLM or LM counted per study. Night ratio is the ratio of events classified in the first half of each study divided by the number of events classified in the second half. Heart rate is the normalized cardiac change (beats per minute) time locked to PLM as described in the text. P-values are calculated from the student t-test with significance level of 0.05. Periodicity index, heart rate, and PLM ratio is only calculated in the presence of PLM. Night ratios are only calculated in cases where PLM or LM occur during both the first and second half of the study.</p><p>Automatically obtained PLM biomarkers in Wisconsin Sleep Cohort.</p

    Automatically obtained PLM biomarkers in Stanford Sleep Cohort.

    No full text
    <p>PLM metrics are calculated from PLM classified using our detector (SNR+). PLM/h and periodicity indices are calculated for wake (PLMW/h) and sleep (PLMS/h). Patients having more two hours of evaluation were grouped according to sleep pathology as determined by formal medical diagnosis. The circadian effect is reversed in narcolepsy, with PLM more likely to occur during the second half of the sleep study, and less extreme in insomnia where PLM are only slightly more frequent (i.e. 33%) in the first half of the study.</p><p>Data are mean ± Standard Error Mean, or percentage. The number of subject used for calculations are shown in parentheses. Probabilities (p) are calculated using one-way analysis of variance between groups with a 0.05 significance level. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0114565#pone-0114565-g004" target="_blank">Fig. 4</a> for description of terms.</p><p>Automatically obtained PLM biomarkers in Stanford Sleep Cohort.</p

    Flow chart of ten-step PLM detection algorithm.

    No full text
    <p>First pass LM detections are used to update the noise floor and generate the three amplitude thresholds a second time. The second pass LM detections are subsequently classified or rejected using AASM 2007 PLM scoring criteria, with our modification for respiratory exclusion.</p
    corecore