25 research outputs found

    Movement perpendicular distance for subjects who grasped the same handle in three consecutive blocks of the CWFF.

    No full text
    <p>Each data point represents the mean perpendicular distance over 6 movements, averaged over subjects.</p

    Experimental setup.

    No full text
    <p>Subjects grasped the handle of the InMotion robotic device (Interactive Motion Technologies, Cambridge, MA) with their right arm abducted at the shoulder and supported by a custom made air sled. Subjects produced horizontal-plane arm movements involving shoulder and elbow rotation to guide the motion of a cursor to a series of visual targets, projected using a computer controlled LCD projector onto a screen suspended 20 cm above the hand and reflected into view by a semi-silvered mirror positioned 10 cm below the screen. This created the illusion that the targets were positioned in the plane of the subject's arm movements.</p

    Experiment 2: Mean proprioceptive acuity.

    No full text
    <p>Mean (± 1 standard deviation) proprioceptive acuity (mm) in Experiment 2 as a function of testing location, testing direction and limb.</p

    Proprioceptive Bias as a function of limb and distance from the body.

    No full text
    <p>Proprioceptive bias in the left-right direction is shown as a function of distance from the body (near, middle, far) for the left and right arms, in Experiments 1 (A) and 2 (B). Data shown are averaged over lateral position.</p

    Participants.

    No full text
    <p>Information about participants in the two experiments.</p

    Movement perpendicular distance is shown over the course of movements in the CWFF, CCWFF and CWFF.

    No full text
    <p>Data plotted in dark grey represent subjects who grasped the same handle in all three sessions. Data plotted in light grey represent subjects who grasped a given handle shape for the CWFF and a different handle shape for the CCWFF. Each data point represents the mean perpendicular distance over 6 movements, averaged over subjects.</p

    Subject Groups.

    No full text
    <p>Subjects were randomly assigned to one of six groups. Each group underwent proprioceptive tests at three distances from the body: 20%, 50% and 80% of their maximum reach.</p
    corecore