12 research outputs found

    The contribution of AAP bacteria to total bacterial abundance (%AAP, squares) and the BChl<i>a</i> content per cell (circles) as function of the DOC to Chl<i>a</i> (DOC:Chl<i>a</i>) ratio.

    No full text
    <p>The data have been log-transformed, the line is the least-square regression, and details of the regression models are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124035#pone.0124035.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p

    Regression models relating AAP bacteria variables to total bacteria or describing the cross-lake patterns in AAP bacteria and total bacteria as a function of environmental variables.

    No full text
    <p>AAP: Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacterial abundance; BA: Total bacterial abundance; Total size: Total prokaryotic cell size; BV: total biovolume; SpBChl<i>a</i>: Pigment content per cell; %BChl<i>a</i>: relative contribution of BChl<i>a</i> to total pigments; Secchi: Secchi disc depth; DOC: Dissolved organic carbon.</p><p>Regression models relating AAP bacteria variables to total bacteria or describing the cross-lake patterns in AAP bacteria and total bacteria as a function of environmental variables.</p

    The relationship of total bacterial abundance (triangles) and AAP bacterial abundance (circles) with total phosphorous concentration (a), Secchi depth (b), and DOC concentration (c).

    No full text
    <p><b>BChl<i>a</i> contents per cell as a function of mean lake chlorophyll concentration (d)</b>. Data have been log-transformed, the line is the least-square regression, and details of the regression models are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124035#pone.0124035.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p

    Relationship between total prokaryote abundance and (a) AAP bacterial abundance and (b) cell size.

    No full text
    <p><b>(c) Contribution of AAP bacteria to total abundance (%AAP) versus their contribution to total bacterial biovolume (%BV).</b> The line in (a) and (b) is the least-square regression, and details of the regression models are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124035#pone.0124035.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>. The line in (c) is the 1:1 line. Data have been log-transformed, and the plots comprise all data collected between July 2007 and October 2008.</p

    Effects of urea fertilization rate (mg N L<sup>-1</sup> week<sup>-1</sup>) on mean planktonic parameters.

    No full text
    <p>Results averaged for days 7–21. Response variables include (a) phytoplankton biomass (as Chl <i>a</i>), (b) bacterial density, (c) gross primary production (GPP), (d) bacterial C consumption (BCC; productivity + respiration), (e) the approximate metabolic balance of plankton communities, measured as GPP: BCC, and (f) dissolved oxygen concentration (DO). Data in each panel includes July (black circles and thick black lines), August (grey triangles and grey lines), and September (white squares and thin black lines) experiments. Solid lines indicate best-fit regression models detailed in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188652#pone.0188652.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>, dashed lines indicate direction of change for trial in which statistically-significant regression models could not be fit. Error bars = ± 1 S.E, and <i>n</i> = 9.</p
    corecore