14 research outputs found
Correlation between ICT positivity rate and <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> Mf prevalence.
<p>Correlation between ICT positivity rate and <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> Mf prevalence.</p
Logistic regression analysis of ICT results according to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> load among the Mf carriers.
<p>Numbers in brackets are percentages.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis of ICT results according to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> load among the Mf carriers.</p
Infection profile of ICT positives cases with respect to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>perstans</i> infection status using day blood.
<p>Infection profile of ICT positives cases with respect to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>perstans</i> infection status using day blood.</p
Gender and age-related prevalence of ICT test card, lymphoedema and diurnal microfilaraemia (TBF).
<p>No <i>W</i>. <i>bancrofti</i> Mf were found in ICT positive and lymphoedema cases.</p><p>Gender and age-related prevalence of ICT test card, lymphoedema and diurnal microfilaraemia (TBF).</p
Infection profile of lymphoedema cases with respect to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>perstans</i> infection status using day blood.
<p>Infection profile of lymphoedema cases with respect to <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>perstans</i> infection status using day blood.</p
Percentage of positive results using ICT card according to the <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> load of microfilariae.
<p>R = 0.438; p < 0.001</p><p>Percentage of positive results using ICT card according to the <i>L</i>. <i>loa</i> load of microfilariae.</p
Clinical algorithm for podoconiosis diagnosis.
<p>The diagnosis of podoconiosis in this study was conducted using clinical history, physical examination and disease-specific tests. The flow chart shows the results of the clinical examination and test.</p