3-Year Follow-Up of the SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS).BackgroundTreatment of restenosis of BMS is characterized by high recurrence rates. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) improved outcome although late catch-up events were documented. Drug-eluting stents tested against VBT in this setting were found superior for at least the first year; superiority at longer follow-up is uncertain.MethodsWe evaluated 3-year outcome of the multicenter SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial, which randomized patients with restenosis of BMS to either a sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or VBT.ResultsTarget vessel failure (cardiac death, infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 9 months as previously reported was significantly improved with SES. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 years documented that survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TVR continues to be significantly improved with SES: freedom from TLR 81.0% versus 71.6% (log-rank p = 0.018), and TVR 78.2% versus 68.8% (log-rank p = 0.022), SES versus VBT. At 3 years, target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, or repeat TLR) remained improved with SES, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.5% for SES, 2.4% for VBT; p = 0.758).ConclusionsAt 3 years of follow-up, after treatment of in-stent restenosis of BMS, patients treated with SES have improved survival free of TLR and TVR compared with patients treated with VBT. Stent thrombosis rates are not different between the 2 groups but are higher than reported in trials of treatment of de novo lesions

Whole Blood Platelet function Assay on the /CHOR

The role of platelets as the initial defense against insult to the vasculature is well established. Moreover, platelets are now recognized as having a critical role in the acute care settings of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures and cardiac catheterization. In the environment of CPB, both platelet count and function have been demonstrated as being markedly compromised during and following the procedure. Unfortunately, current assays that are used to evaluate the parameters of platelet count and function are limited in regard to their utility in a near patient format. Here, we describe a practical, rapid, and user-friendly whole blood platelet function assay that has been developed for the ICHOR™ point-of-care hematology analyzer. This analyzer is capable of performing an eight parameter blood profile including platelet count. In comparable studies, platelet aggregation in whole blood demonstrated good correlation (for ADP the values were n=14, r2=0.81, p=0.0001; for collagen, n=10, r2=0.93, p=0.0001; for ristocetin, n=10, r2=0.89, p=0.0001; and for epinephrine, n=10, r2=0.81, p=0.0003) with traditional platelet-rich aggregometry, which uses increased light transmission as an indication of platelet aggregation. Furthermore, early feasibility studies in CPB patients demonstrated both decreased platelet count and a marked reduction in platelet function peri-procedurally. This new assay of platelet function is extremely suitable for the clinical environment with rapid turnaround time and provides a full hematology profile to enhance transfusion decisions