4 research outputs found

    One year cost effectiveness of sirolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in the treatment of single native de novo coronary lesions: an analysis from the RAVEL trial

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the balance between costs and effects of the sirolimus eluting stent in the treatment of single native de novo coronary lesions in the RAVEL (randomised study with the sirolimus eluting Bx Velocity balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions) study. DESIGN: Multicentre, double blind, randomised trial. SETTING: Percutaneous coronary intervention for single de novo coronary lesions. PATIENTS: 238 patients with stable or unstable angina. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation to sirolimus eluting stent or bare stent implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were followed up to one year and the treatment effects were expressed as one year survival free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Costs were estimated as the product of resource utilisation and Dutch unit costs. RESULTS: At one year, the absolute difference in MACE-free survival was 23% in favour of the sirolimus eluting stent group. At the index procedure, sirolimus eluting stent implantation had an estimated additional procedural cost of 1286. At one year, however, the estimated additional cost difference had decreased to 54 because of the reduction in the need for repeat revascularisations in the sirolimus group (0.8% v 23.6%; p < 0.01). After adjustment of actual results for the consequences of angiographic follow up (correction based on data from the BENESTENT (Belgium Netherlands stent) II study), the difference in MACE-free survival was estimated at 11.1% and the addit

    Maternal recall of prescription medication use during pregnancy using a paper-based questionnaire:a validation study in the Netherlands

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: In case-control studies that assess associations between medication use and birth defects, detailed information on type of medication and timing of use is essential to prevent misclassification. However, data on the accuracy of recall of medication use during pregnancy are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate a self-administered questionnaire to assess prescription medication use in the 3 months before and during pregnancy. METHODS: This validation study was embedded in Eurocat Northern Netherlands, a population-based birth defects registry that covers 10 % of all births in The Netherlands. The questionnaire was validated among 560 mothers of infants with major birth defects registered from 1 January 2009 through 30 June 2010 by comparing it with a reference standard consisting of pharmacy data which were checked for compliance by maternal interviews. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to quantify validity for any prescription medication use, groups of medications and individual medications. In addition, we determined whether maternal characteristics influenced disagreement between the questionnaire and the reference standard using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The sensitivity for any prescription medication use was 0.57, ranging between 0.07 (dermatological corticosteroids) and 0.83 (antihypertensives) for medication groups, and between 0.00 (naproxen) and 0.73 (salbutamol) for individual medications. Overall, specificity was high (0.93-1.00). Smoking during pregnancy and completing the questionnaire >2 years after delivery were associated with increased disagreement between the questionnaire for prescription medication use and the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the self-administered questionnaire for prescription medication use during pregnancy was moderate to poor for most medications and disagreement differed by some maternal characteristics. As many epidemiological studies use similar questionnaires to assess medication use these studies may need additional data sources such as pharmacy records or prescription databases for medication use next to self-reported methods. Also, previous knowledge on the effect of questionnaire design should be taken into account
    corecore