26 research outputs found
The Intestinal Gas Questionnaire (IGQ): Psychometric validation of a new instrument for measuring gas-related symptoms and their impact on daily life among general population and irritable bowel syndrome
Gas-related symptoms; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of lifeSĂntomas relacionados con los gases; Resultados informados por el paciente; Calidad de vidaSĂmptomes relacionats amb els gasos; Resultats informats pel pacient; Qualitat de vidaBackground
Gas-related symptoms (GRS) are common in the general population (GPop) and among patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions but there is no patient-reported outcome evaluating these symptoms and their impact on daily life. We have previously developed a 43-item intestinal gas questionnaire (IGQ). The aim of the present study is to perform a psychometric validation of this instrument.
Methods
Participants (119 from the GPop and 186 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients) were recruited from 3 countries (UK, Spain, France). IBS patients fulfilled ROME IV criteria with an IBS severity score between 150 and 300. Participants completed the IGQ, the functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL), and the EQ-5D. A subgroup (n = 90) repeated the IGQ completion after 7 days on paper or electronically.
Results
From the original IGQ questionnaire, 26 items were deleted because of poor performance. Confirmatory factorial analysis on the remaining 17 items (7 symptom and 10 impact items) yielded a 6-factor structure accounting for 67% of the variance for bloating (6 items), flatulence (3), belching (2), bad breath (2), stomach rumbling (2), and difficult gas evacuation (2). Global score (0-100) was worse among IBS vs GPop (40 ± 15 vs 33 ± 17; p = 0.0016). At the second visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient of IGQ scores was between 0.71 and 0.86 (n = 67) for test-retest reliability and 0.61-0.87 (n = 64) for equivalence between electronic and paper versions of IGQ.
Conclusion
The IGQ available in paper and electronic versions in 3 languages is a robust instrument for capturing and measuring GRS and their impact on daily life.This Investigator Sponsored Study has been funded by Danone Research. Danone did not interfere with the analysis and interpretation of data. The work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (DirecciĂłn General de InvestigaciĂłn CientĂfica y TĂ©cnica, SAF 2016-76648-R). Ciberehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos II
The Intestinal Gas Questionnaire (IGQ) : Psychometric validation of a new instrument for measuring gas-related symptoms and their impact on daily life among general population and irritable bowel syndrome
Gas-related symptoms (GRS) are common in the general population (GPop) and among patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions but there is no patient-reported outcome evaluating these symptoms and their impact on daily life. We have previously developed a 43-item intestinal gas questionnaire (IGQ). The aim of the present study is to perform a psychometric validation of this instrument. Participants (119 from the GPop and 186 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients) were recruited from 3 countries (UK, Spain, France). IBS patients fulfilled ROME IV criteria with an IBS severity score between 150 and 300. Participants completed the IGQ, the functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL), and the EQ-5D. A subgroup (n = 90) repeated the IGQ completion after 7 days on paper or electronically. From the original IGQ questionnaire, 26 items were deleted because of poor performance. Confirmatory factorial analysis on the remaining 17 items (7 symptom and 10 impact items) yielded a 6-factor structure accounting for 67% of the variance for bloating (6 items), flatulence (3), belching (2), bad breath (2), stomach rumbling (2), and difficult gas evacuation (2). Global score (0-100) was worse among IBS vs GPop (40 ± 15 vs 33 ± 17; p = 0.0016). At the second visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient of IGQ scores was between 0.71 and 0.86 (n = 67) for test-retest reliability and 0.61-0.87 (n = 64) for equivalence between electronic and paper versions of IGQ. The IGQ available in paper and electronic versions in 3 languages is a robust instrument for capturing and measuring GRS and their impact on daily life. Intestinal Gas Quesitonnaire (IGQ): a new tool to measure Gas-Related Symptoms and their impact on daily life
LâĂ©valuation de la compĂ©tence lexicale chez les adultes francophones Comment intĂ©grer lâinfĂ©rence ?
International audienc
Ăvaluer les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles : que tester ?
International audienc
LâĂ©valuation de la compĂ©tence lexicale chez les adultes francophones Comment intĂ©grer lâinfĂ©rence ?
International audienc
Travailler la syntaxe dans les formations Ă lâĂ©crit professionnel
International audienc
Les Ă©tudiants et leur perception de leurs compĂ©tences Ă lâĂ©crit : Ă©tude du âdegrĂ© de luciditĂ©â
International audienc
« Quelle conscience de mes compĂ©tences Ă lâĂ©crit ? » Ătude du « degrĂ© de lucidité » chez les Ă©tudiants
Notre contribution sâinscrit dans le champ des littĂ©racies avancĂ©es et envisage plus particuliĂšrement les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles des Ă©tudiants en français Ă©crit et le dĂ©veloppement possible de celles-ci. Nous examinons le degrĂ© de conscience quâont les scripteurs de leurs compĂ©tences dans trois domaines linguistiques : lâorthographe, la syntaxe et le lexique. Nous analysons les rĂ©sultats dâune cohorte dâĂ©tudiants de premier cycle Ă un test mesurant les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles dâadultes francophones en français Ă©crit (Certificat en CompĂ©tences RĂ©dactionnelles ou CCR). Durant la passation, les candidats devaient indiquer sâils Ă©taient sĂ»rs ou non des rĂ©ponses quâils fournissaient. Ces donnĂ©es ont permis de calculer le degrĂ© de luciditĂ© des candidats. Les principaux rĂ©sultats indiquent des corrĂ©lations stables entre les domaines. Par ailleurs, le lexique est le domaine le moins conscientisĂ©. Nous proposons in fine une dĂ©marche pĂ©dagogique visant explicitement le dĂ©veloppement de la conscience mĂ©tacognitive dans les formations portant sur les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles
âQuelle conscience de mes compĂ©tences Ă lâĂ©crit ?â Ătude du âdegrĂ© de luciditĂ©â chez les Ă©tudiants
International audienc
Les Ă©tudiants et leur perception de leurs compĂ©tences Ă lâĂ©crit : Ă©tude du âdegrĂ© de luciditĂ©â
International audienc