26 research outputs found

    The Intestinal Gas Questionnaire (IGQ): Psychometric validation of a new instrument for measuring gas-related symptoms and their impact on daily life among general population and irritable bowel syndrome

    Get PDF
    Gas-related symptoms; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of lifeSíntomas relacionados con los gases; Resultados informados por el paciente; Calidad de vidaSímptomes relacionats amb els gasos; Resultats informats pel pacient; Qualitat de vidaBackground Gas-related symptoms (GRS) are common in the general population (GPop) and among patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions but there is no patient-reported outcome evaluating these symptoms and their impact on daily life. We have previously developed a 43-item intestinal gas questionnaire (IGQ). The aim of the present study is to perform a psychometric validation of this instrument. Methods Participants (119 from the GPop and 186 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients) were recruited from 3 countries (UK, Spain, France). IBS patients fulfilled ROME IV criteria with an IBS severity score between 150 and 300. Participants completed the IGQ, the functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL), and the EQ-5D. A subgroup (n = 90) repeated the IGQ completion after 7 days on paper or electronically. Results From the original IGQ questionnaire, 26 items were deleted because of poor performance. Confirmatory factorial analysis on the remaining 17 items (7 symptom and 10 impact items) yielded a 6-factor structure accounting for 67% of the variance for bloating (6 items), flatulence (3), belching (2), bad breath (2), stomach rumbling (2), and difficult gas evacuation (2). Global score (0-100) was worse among IBS vs GPop (40 ± 15 vs 33 ± 17; p = 0.0016). At the second visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient of IGQ scores was between 0.71 and 0.86 (n = 67) for test-retest reliability and 0.61-0.87 (n = 64) for equivalence between electronic and paper versions of IGQ. Conclusion The IGQ available in paper and electronic versions in 3 languages is a robust instrument for capturing and measuring GRS and their impact on daily life.This Investigator Sponsored Study has been funded by Danone Research. Danone did not interfere with the analysis and interpretation of data. The work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica, SAF 2016-76648-R). Ciberehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos II

    The Intestinal Gas Questionnaire (IGQ) : Psychometric validation of a new instrument for measuring gas-related symptoms and their impact on daily life among general population and irritable bowel syndrome

    Get PDF
    Gas-related symptoms (GRS) are common in the general population (GPop) and among patients with disorders of gut-brain interactions but there is no patient-reported outcome evaluating these symptoms and their impact on daily life. We have previously developed a 43-item intestinal gas questionnaire (IGQ). The aim of the present study is to perform a psychometric validation of this instrument. Participants (119 from the GPop and 186 irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients) were recruited from 3 countries (UK, Spain, France). IBS patients fulfilled ROME IV criteria with an IBS severity score between 150 and 300. Participants completed the IGQ, the functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL), and the EQ-5D. A subgroup (n = 90) repeated the IGQ completion after 7 days on paper or electronically. From the original IGQ questionnaire, 26 items were deleted because of poor performance. Confirmatory factorial analysis on the remaining 17 items (7 symptom and 10 impact items) yielded a 6-factor structure accounting for 67% of the variance for bloating (6 items), flatulence (3), belching (2), bad breath (2), stomach rumbling (2), and difficult gas evacuation (2). Global score (0-100) was worse among IBS vs GPop (40 ± 15 vs 33 ± 17; p = 0.0016). At the second visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient of IGQ scores was between 0.71 and 0.86 (n = 67) for test-retest reliability and 0.61-0.87 (n = 64) for equivalence between electronic and paper versions of IGQ. The IGQ available in paper and electronic versions in 3 languages is a robust instrument for capturing and measuring GRS and their impact on daily life. Intestinal Gas Quesitonnaire (IGQ): a new tool to measure Gas-Related Symptoms and their impact on daily life

    Travailler la syntaxe dans les formations Ă  l’écrit professionnel

    No full text
    International audienc

    « Quelle conscience de mes compĂ©tences Ă  l’écrit ? » Étude du « degrĂ© de lucidité » chez les Ă©tudiants

    No full text
    Notre contribution s’inscrit dans le champ des littĂ©racies avancĂ©es et envisage plus particuliĂšrement les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles des Ă©tudiants en français Ă©crit et le dĂ©veloppement possible de celles-ci. Nous examinons le degrĂ© de conscience qu’ont les scripteurs de leurs compĂ©tences dans trois domaines linguistiques : l’orthographe, la syntaxe et le lexique. Nous analysons les rĂ©sultats d’une cohorte d’étudiants de premier cycle Ă  un test mesurant les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles d’adultes francophones en français Ă©crit (Certificat en CompĂ©tences RĂ©dactionnelles ou CCR). Durant la passation, les candidats devaient indiquer s’ils Ă©taient sĂ»rs ou non des rĂ©ponses qu’ils fournissaient. Ces donnĂ©es ont permis de calculer le degrĂ© de luciditĂ© des candidats. Les principaux rĂ©sultats indiquent des corrĂ©lations stables entre les domaines. Par ailleurs, le lexique est le domaine le moins conscientisĂ©. Nous proposons in fine une dĂ©marche pĂ©dagogique visant explicitement le dĂ©veloppement de la conscience mĂ©tacognitive dans les formations portant sur les compĂ©tences rĂ©dactionnelles
    corecore