Circuits for Protecting and Triggering SCRs in High-Power Converters

The performance of high-power converters employing silicon controlled rectifiers (SCRs) operating at several kilovolts and switching several thousands of amperes is strongly dependent on the triggering circuit and the protecting circuit (snubber) used. In this paper two standalone trigger circuit topologies are discussed and test results are given for one of them in particular, built with off-the-shelf components. A standard snubber circuit configuration was used and its ability to protect the SCR was examined by classical analytical methods and by computer simulation. Results of these calculations are reported as well as predictions about the fault tolerance afforded by the snubber design to a high power converter using SCRs. Since the components of the SCR protective circuits strongly affect the overall package size of the converter and tend to determine the minimum size and weight achievable, a conceptual design is also presented for a combined snubber-trigger circuit with the potential for reduced size and weight for the whole assembly.Center for Electromechanic

A Moving Boundary Diffusion Model for PIN Diodes

A large number of diode models exist that simulate the reverse recovery process. Many models assume an abrupt change of current during reverse recovery. Some models were verified by calculating the diode's response after the application of a step forcing voltage. Only a few models described in the literature compare simulation results with experimental data. The abrupt change in current calculated by most diode models will ensure large di/dt, which in turn will result in the calculation of an excessive voltage spike. The diode model described in this paper is aimed at the application of high power rectification where the exciting voltage is more likely to be sinusoidal rather than a step change. The formulation is particularly useful in modeling very high power systems such as electromagnetic launch systems where calculation speed and accuracy of results are held at a premium. The model is formulated based on a p+in+ type diode. In addition, by considering the fact that the width of the intrinsic bulk region reduces significantly during the reverse biased condition, the model will more accurately calculate reverse recovery current and voltage. Finally, the model is verified by comparing simulation results to experimental dataCenter for Electromechanic

Effect of Converter Packaging Techniques on Device Electrical Conduction

High power converters handling several thousands of amperes and employing solid state switches (silicon controlled rectifiers, or SCRs, for example), often have to use multiple devices in parallel. Additionally, if the converter operates across a high voltage bus, it may also require a series/parallel combination of SCRs. It is clear, therefore, that multiple conducting paths are created in any one leg of the converter. Because of mechanical requirements and practical considerations regarding the mounting of the SCRs and the routing of power to them, differential reactances are generated among the different paths, leading unavoidably to unequal current sharing among the various SCRs. This serious consequence may limit the effective current that can be switched or force the use of larger devices, if this is possible. It is very important, therefore, to be able to estimate the actual current distribution among the various power switches for a given realization of the converter. This paper discusses the problem as it was experienced in the actual implementation of a three-phase SCR bridge converter. The system geometry is described and the results of the electromagnetic finite-element analysis of one leg of the converter are given, highlighting the expected current distribution unbalance.Center for Electromechanic

Single and Multiphase Compulsator System Architectures: A Practical Comparison

The Center for Electromechanics at the University of Texas at Austin (UT-CEM) has designed, built, and tested three generations of iron-core and air-core compensated pulsed alternators (CPA). These include the iron core, small caliber, cannon caliber, and model scale compulsators. Early CPA were single-phase machines that were optimized for a specific load and desired performance. The most recent machine, the model-scale CPA, is a multiphase alternator coupled to the load through a rectifier. This paper includes a discussion of the requirements and capabilities of both single-phase and multiphase systems, a point design for each system type, and a comparison of system performance in driving a cannon caliber launcherCenter for Electromechanic

Observation of a Narrow Resonance of Mass 2.46 GeV/c^2 Decaying to D_s^*+ pi^0 and Confirmation of the D_sJ^* (2317) State

Using 13.5 inverse fb of e+e- annihilation data collected with the CLEO II detector we have observed a narrow resonance in the Ds*+pi0 final state, with a mass near 2.46 GeV. The search for such a state was motivated by the recent discovery by the BaBar Collaboration of a narrow state at 2.32 GeV, the DsJ*(2317)+ that decays to Ds+pi0. Reconstructing the Ds+pi0 and Ds*+pi0 final states in CLEO data, we observe peaks in both of the corresponding reconstructed mass difference distributions, dM(Dspi0)=M(Dspi0)-M(Ds) and dM(Ds*pi0)=M(Ds*pi0)-M(Ds*), both of them at values near 350 MeV. We interpret these peaks as signatures of two distinct states, the DsJ*(2317)+ plus a new state, designated as the DsJ(2463)+. Because of the similar dM values, each of these states represents a source of background for the other if photons are lost, ignored or added. A quantitative accounting of these reflections confirms that both states exist. We have measured the mean mass differences = 350.0 +/- 1.2 [stat] +/- 1.0 [syst] MeV for the DsJ*(2317) state, and = 351.2 +/- 1.7 [stat] +/- 1.0 [syst] MeV for the new DsJ(2463)+ state. We have also searched, but find no evidence, for decays of the two states via the channels Ds*+gamma, Ds+gamma, and Ds+pi+pi-. The observations of the two states at 2.32 and 2.46 GeV, in the Ds+pi0 and Ds*+pi0 decay channels respectively, are consistent with their interpretations as (c anti-strange) mesons with orbital angular momentum L=1, and spin-parities of 0+ and 1+.Comment: 16 pages postscript, also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS, version to be published in Physical Review D; minor modifications and fixes to typographical errors, plus an added section on production properties. The main results are unchanged; they supersede those reported in hep-ex/030501

Measurement of the Charge Asymmetry in B→K∗(892)±π∓B\to K^* (892)^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}

We report on a search for a CP-violating asymmetry in the charmless hadronic decay B -> K*(892)+- pi-+, using 9.12 fb^-1 of integrated luminosity produced at \sqrt{s}=10.58 GeV and collected with the CLEO detector. We find A_{CP}(B -> K*(892)+- pi-+) = 0.26+0.33-0.34(stat.)+0.10-0.08(syst.), giving an allowed interval of [-0.31,0.78] at the 90% confidence level.Comment: 7 pages postscript, also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS, submitted to PR

Study of the q^2-Dependence of B --> pi ell nu and B --> rho(omega)ell nu Decay and Extraction of |V_ub|

We report on determinations of |Vub| resulting from studies of the branching fraction and q^2 distributions in exclusive semileptonic B decays that proceed via the b->u transition. Our data set consists of the 9.7x10^6 BBbar meson pairs collected at the Y(4S) resonance with the CLEO II detector. We measure B(B0 -> pi- l+ nu) = (1.33 +- 0.18 +- 0.11 +- 0.01 +- 0.07)x10^{-4} and B(B0 -> rho- l+ nu) = (2.17 +- 0.34 +0.47/-0.54 +- 0.41 +- 0.01)x10^{-4}, where the errors are statistical, experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We also find B(B+ -> eta l+ nu) = (0.84 +- 0.31 +- 0.16 +- 0.09)x10^{-4}, consistent with what is expected from the B -> pi l nu mode and quark model symmetries. We extract |Vub| using Light-Cone Sum Rules (LCSR) for 0<= q^2<16 GeV^2 and Lattice QCD (LQCD) for 16 GeV^2 <= q^2 < q^2_max. Combining both intervals yields |Vub| = (3.24 +- 0.22 +- 0.13 +0.55/-0.39 +- 0.09)x10^{-3}$ for pi l nu, and |Vub| = (3.00 +- 0.21 +0.29/-0.35 +0.49/-0.38 +-0.28)x10^{-3} for rho l nu, where the errors are statistical, experimental systematic, theoretical, and signal form-factor shape, respectively. Our combined value from both decay modes is |Vub| = (3.17 +- 0.17 +0.16/-0.17 +0.53/-0.39 +-0.03)x10^{-3}.Comment: 45 pages postscript, also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS, submitted to PR

Search for CP Violation in D^0--> K_S^0 pi^+pi^-

We report on a search for CP violation in the decay of D0 and D0B to Kshort pi+pi-. The data come from an integrated luminosity of 9.0 1/fb of e+e- collisions at sqrt(s) ~ 10 GeV recorded with the CLEO II.V detector. The resonance substructure of this decay is well described by ten quasi-two-body decay channels (K*-pi+, K*0(1430)-pi+, K*2(1430)-pi+, K*(1680)-pi+, Kshort rho, Kshort omega, Kshort f0(980), Kshort f2(1270), Kshort f0(1370), and the ``wrong sign'' K*+ pi-) plus a small non-resonant component. We observe no evidence for CP violation in the amplitudes and phases that describe the decay D0 to K_S^0 pi+pi-.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, also available at http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS/, submitted to PR