Does Bachmann's bundle pacing prevent atrial fibrillation in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients? A 12 months follow-up study

Paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias occur in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1) patients frequently. Pacemaker (PM) including detailed diagnostic functions may facilitate the diagnosis and management of frequent paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias that may remain undetected during conventional clinical follow-up. Aim of our study was to evaluate the preventive effects of interatrial septum pacing in the Bachmann's Bundle region on atrial fibrillation (AF) in MD1 patients during 12 months follow up period. Thirty MD1 patients (age 50.3 +/- 7.3; 11 F) who underwent dual chamber PM implantation were randomized at implantation to receive right atrial appendage pacing (16 patients) or Bachmann's bundle pacing (14 patients). No statistically significant difference in the electrical parameters (P wave amplitude, pacing threshold and lead impedance) was found between the two groups at implantation. Patients were followed at 1 month, 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter. They underwent clinical assessment, a standard 12-lead ECG and assessment of device performance at every visit. We counted the number of episodes of atrial arrhythmia occurred during the collection period and the duration of each episode. At 12 months of follow-up, no statistically significant differences in the number of AF episodes or in AF duration were found. Lead parameters remained stable over time and there were no displacements of the electrodes after implantation. Implantation of an atrial-active fixation lead on the atrial septum is safe and feasible. However, this study showed no significant difference between septal pacing and high atrial pacing, using the endpoints of AF duration and number of AF episodes

Stress Echocardiography in Italian Echocardiographic Laboratories: A Survey of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging

Background: The Italian Society of Echography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand the volumes of activity, modalities and stressors used during stress echocardiography (SE) in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved through an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories, and SE examinations were performed in 179 centers (80.6%): 87 centers (47.5%) were in the northern regions of Italy, 33 centers (18.4%) were in the central regions, and 61 (34.1%) in the southern regions. We annotated a total of 4057 SE. We divided the SE centers into three groups, according to the numbers of SE performed: <10 SE (low-volume activity, 40 centers), between 10 and 39 SE (moderate volume activity, 102 centers) and >= 40 SE (high volume activity, 37 centers). Dipyridamole was used in 139 centers (77.6%); exercise in 120 centers (67.0%); dobutamine in 153 centers (85.4%); pacing in 37 centers (21.1%); and adenosine in 7 centers (4.0%). We found a significant difference between the stressors used and volume of activity of the centers, with a progressive increase in the prevalence of number of stressors from low to high volume activity (P = 0.033). The traditional evaluation of regional wall motion of the left ventricle was performed in all centers, with combined assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in 90 centers (50.3%): there was a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: the incidence of analysis of CFVR was significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (32.5%, 41.0% and 73.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). The lung ultrasound (LUS) was assessed in 67 centers (37.4%). Furthermore for LUS, we found a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (25.0%, 35.3% and 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that SE was significantly widespread and practiced throughout Italy. In addition to the traditional indication to coronary artery disease based on regional wall motion analysis, other indications are emerging with an increase in the use of LUS and CFVR, especially in high-volume centers