Maternal haemodynamics in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy under antihypertensive therapy (HyperDiP): study protocol for a prospective observational case-control study

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with a high incidence of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. HDP, in particular pre-eclampsia, have been determined as risk factors for future cardiovascular disease. Recently, the common hypothesis of pre-eclampsia being a placental disorder was challenged as numerous studies show evidence for short-term and long-term cardiovascular changes in pregnancies affected by HDP, suggesting a cardiovascular origin of the disease. Despite new insights into the pathophysiology of HDP, concepts of therapy remain unchanged and evidence for improved maternal and neonatal outcome by using antihypertensive agents is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective observational case-control study, including 100 women with HDP and 100 healthy controls, which will assess maternal haemodynamics using the USCOM 1A Monitor and Arteriograph along with cardiovascular markers (soluble fms-like kinase 1/placental-like growth factor, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) in women with HDP under antihypertensive therapy, including a follow-up at 3 months and 1 year post partum, will be conducted over a 50-month period in Vienna. A prospective, longitudinal study of cardiovascular surrogate markers conducted in Oslo will serve as a comparative cohort for the Vienna cohort of haemodynamic parameters in pregnancy including a longer follow-up period of up to 3 years post partum. Each site will provide a dataset of a patient group and a control group and will be assessed for the outcome categories USCOM 1A measurements, Arteriograph measurements and Angiogenic marker measurements. To estimate the effect of antihypertensive therapy on outcome parameters, ORs with 95% CIs will be computed. Longitudinal changes of outcome parameters will be compared between normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies using mixed-effects models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted to all participating centres. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at national and international conferences

Prognostic Value of Angiogenic Markers in Pregnant Women With Chronic Hypertension.

Background Women with chronic hypertension face a 5- to 6-fold increased risk of developing preeclampsia compared with normotensive women. Angiogenic markers, especially soluble fms-like kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF), were identified as clinically useful markers predicting the development of preeclampsia, but data on the prediction of superimposed preeclampsia are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for delivery because of superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension. Methods and Results This retrospective study included 142 women with chronic hypertension and suspected superimposed preeclampsia. Twenty-seven women (19.0%) delivered because of maternal indications only, 17 women (12.0%) because of fetal indications primarily, and 98 women (69.0%) for other reasons. Women who both delivered because of maternal indications and for fetal indications had a significantly higher sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (median 99.9 and 120.2 versus 7.3, respectively, P<0.001 for both) and lower PlGF levels (median 73.6 and 53.3 versus 320.0 pg/mL, respectively, P<0.001 for both) compared with women who delivered for other reasons. SFlt-1/PlGF ratio and PlGF were strong predictors for delivery because of superimposed preeclampsia, whether for maternal or fetal indications (P<0.05). Half of women with angiogenic imbalance (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≥85 or PlGF levels <100 pg/mL) delivered because of maternal or fetal indications within 1.6 weeks (95% CI, 1.0-2.4 weeks). Conclusions Angiogenic marker imbalance in women with suspected superimposed preeclampsia can predict delivery because of maternal and fetal indications related to superimposed preeclampsia and is associated with a significantly shorter time to delivery interval

Biweekly Versus Monthly Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy for Primary Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy.

Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of congenital CMV (cCMV). Hyperimmune globulin (HIG) therapy has been proposed as a potential prophylaxis to reduce maternal-fetal transmission. Data on whether the administration of HIG every 2 weeks offers benefits over HIG administration every 4 weeks are lacking. This was a retrospective analysis including pregnant women with primary CMV infection diagnosed in the first or early second trimester between 2010 and 2022 treated with HIG every 4 weeks (300 IE HIG per kg) or every 2 weeks (200 IE HIG per kg), respectively. In total, 36 women (4 weeks: n = 26; 2 weeks: n = 10) and 39 newborns (4 weeks: n = 29; 2 weeks: n = 10) were included. The median gestational age at the first HIG administration was 13.1 weeks. There was no significant difference in the cCMV rates between the women who received HIG every 4 versus every 2 weeks (n = 8/24 [33.3%] vs. 3/10 [30.0%]; p = 0.850). An abnormal fetal ultrasound was present in three fetuses and fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anomalies in four fetuses were related to cCMV infection, with no significant difference in the frequency between the two groups. A larger study will be needed to determine whether HIG administration every 2 instead of every 4 weeks improves the maternal-fetal transmission rates

Should angiogenic markers be included in diagnostic criteria of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension?

Objective Although the most recent guidance from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) has highlighted the role of angiogenic marker assessment in the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia (PE) in women with chronic hypertension, the ISSHP has withheld recommending its implementation due to the limited available evidence in this group of women. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the value of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) assessment in women with chronic hypertension and suspected superimposed PE. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data recorded in an electronic database between January 2013 and October 2019. Women with chronic hypertension and singleton pregnancy who had suspected superimposed PE were included. Superimposed PE was suspected in women presenting with worsening hypertension, epigastric pain, new-onset edema, dyspnea or neurological symptoms. The exclusion criteria were delivery within 1 week after assessment for reasons other than PE, chronic kidney disease, history of cardiac disease, fetal aneuploidy, genetic syndrome or major structural anomaly and missing pregnancy outcome. Maternal serum angiogenic markers (sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) were measured. The primary outcome was the utility of angiogenic markers in the prediction of superimposed PE. Predictive accuracy was assessed for superimposed PE diagnosed at different timepoints, including within 1 week after assessment and any time before birth. The secondary outcome was comparison of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between women with superimposed PE diagnosed according to the traditional ISSHP criteria and those diagnosed according to extended criteria including angiogenic markers. The predictive accuracy of each angiogenic marker was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristics-curve analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) values were compared using De Long's test. A sensitivity analysis was planned for gestational age at assessment. The association of various variables with composite adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes was assessed using binomial regression. Results The study included 142 pregnant women with chronic hypertension and suspected superimposed PE, of whom 25 (17.6%) developed PE within 1 week after assessment, 52 (36.6%) developed PE at any timepoint before birth and 90 (63.4%) delivered without PE. Maternal serum angiogenic imbalance was associated significantly with superimposed PE diagnosed according to the ISSHP criteria within 1 week or at any time after assessment (P  99.9%, 95.6% and > 99.9%, respectively), without a meaningful decrease in specificity. The addition of angiogenic imbalance improved the detection rate for composite adverse perinatal outcome (20.6% increase; 95% CrI, 0.0–42.2%), with a high posterior probability (96.9%). There was a corresponding drop in specificity (5.7% decrease; 95% CrI, −2.3% to 13.6%), with a posterior probability of 91.8%. Conclusions In women with chronic hypertension and suspected superimposed PE, addition of maternal serum angiogenic markers to the traditional diagnostic criteria for superimposed PE improved significantly the sensitivity for the prediction of both maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Implementation of angiogenic marker assessment in the evaluation of pregnant women with chronic hypertension should therefore be considered

Longitudinal assessment of angiogenic markers in prediction of adverse outcome in women with confirmed pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVES: Angiogenic marker assessment such as the ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF), is known to be a useful tool in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. However, evidence on surveillance strategies in pregnancies with pre-eclampsia diagnosis is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to assess the predictive performance of longitudinal maternal serum angiogenic marker assessment for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to standard laboratory parameters in pregnancies with confirmed pre-eclampsia. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from January 2013 to December 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. The inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with confirmed pre-eclampsia and post-diagnosis maternal serum angiogenic marker assessment in at least two time points. The primary outcome was the predictive performance of longitudinal sFlt-1 and PlGF assessment for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to longitudinal conventional laboratory monitoring measured at the same time as the angiogenic markers in pregnancies with confirmed pre-eclampsia. Composite maternal adverse outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, pulmonary edema, eclampsia, and death. Composite adverse perinatal outcomes included stillbirth, neonatal death, placental abruption, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory distress syndrome, and mechanical ventilator support. RESULTS: In total 885 post-diagnosis sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measurements were taken from 323 pregnant women with confirmed pre-eclampsia. For composite maternal adverse outcome, the highest stand-alone predictive accuracy was obtained using maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (AUROC 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.81), creatinine (AUROC 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (AUROC 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81). Maternal platelet levels (AUROC 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.74), serum alanine transaminase (ALT) (AUROC 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.69) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (AUROC 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.71) levels had poor stand-alone predictive accuracy. The best prediction model consisted of a combination of maternal serum LDH, creatinine levels and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, which had an AUROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.85), significantly higher than sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone (P=0.037). For composite perinatal adverse outcome, the highest stand-alone predictive accuracy was obtained using maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (AUROC 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89) and creatinine (AUROC 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.80) levels, while sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was superior to creatinine alone (P0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal maternal serum angiogenic marker assessment is a good predictor of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and superior to some of the conventional laboratory parameters in pregnancies with pre-eclampsia. More studies should focus on the optimal surveillance following the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Prognostic value of angiogenic markers in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies with fetal growth restriction are at increased risk of preeclampsia. Angiogenic markers including soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) are altered in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR). The utility of these markers as a predictor of preeclampsia in women with growth-restricted fetuses is still uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of angiogenic markers for predicting the development of preeclampsia in pregnancies with FGR and suspected preeclampsia. METHODS: This study included 93 women with FGR, defined according to Delphi consensus criteria, who were assessed for angiogenic markers sFlt-1 and PlGF for suspicion of preeclampsia at the Department of Obstetrics and feto-maternal Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna between 2013 and 2020. Women with established diagnosis of preeclampsia at sampling were excluded. Cox regression analysis and logistic regression were performed to demonstrate the association of angiogenic markers with the outcome. RESULTS: Within this cohort, 14 women (15.1%) developed preeclampsia within one week from sampling, 21 (22.6%) within two weeks, 38 (40.9%) at any time. The sFLT-1/PLGF ratio consistently showed a stronger association with development of preeclampsia compared to sFlt-1 or PlGF alone in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (PE within a week, AUC 0.85 vs 0.82 and 0.72, respectively). Models including sFlt-1/PlGF were more strongly associated with preeclampsia hazard compared to sFlt-1 and PlGF alone models (C-index: 0.79±0.046 vs 0.76±0.048 and 0.75±0.047, respectively). Risk classification capabilities of sFlt-1/PlGF decreased after the two-week time point. The established cut-off value for ruling out preeclampsia (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio <38) was effective with a negative predictive value of 93.3% and sensitivity of 95.2%. CONCLUSION: Combined use of sFlt-1/PlGF can be preferred to PlGF alone in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction. Moreover, established cut-offs for ruling-out development of preeclampsia seem to be effective in these patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved