Intimal Hyperplasia in Balloon Dilated Coronary Arteries is Reduced by Local Delivery of the NO Donor, SIN-1 Via a cGMP-Dependent Pathway

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To elucidate the mechanism by which local delivery of 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1) affects intimal hyperplasia after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Porcine coronary arteries were treated with PTCA and immediately afterwards locally treated for 5 minutes, with a selective cytosolic guanylate cyclase inhibitor, 1 H-(1,2,4)oxadiazole(4,3-alpha)quinoxaline-1-one (ODQ) + SIN-1 or only SIN-1 using a drug delivery-balloon. Arteries were angiographically depicted, morphologically evaluated and analyzed after one and eight weeks for actin, myosin and intermediate filaments (IF) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) contents.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Luminal diameter after PCI in arteries treated with SIN-1 alone and corrected for age-growth was significantly larger as compared to ODQ + SIN-1 or to controls (p < 0.01). IF/actin ratio after one week in SIN-1 treated segments was not different compared to untreated segments, but was significantly reduced compared to ODQ + SIN-1 treated vessels (p < 0.05). Expression of endothelial NADPH diaphorase activity was significantly lower in untreated segments and in SIN-1 treated segments compared to controls and SIN-1 + ODQ treated arteries (p < 0.01). Restenosis index (p < 0.01) and intimal hyperplasia (p < 0.01) were significantly reduced while the residual lumen was increased (p < 0.01) in SIN-1 segments compared to controls and ODQ + SIN-1 treated vessels.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>After PTCA local delivery of high concentrations of the NO donor SIN-1 for 5 minutes inhibited injury induced neointimal hyperplasia. This favorable effect was abolished by inhibition of guanylyl cyclase indicating mediation of a cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent pathway. The momentary events at the time of injury play crucial role in the ensuring development of intimal hyperplasia.</p

Therapeutic potential of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in the management of acute stroke

The nitric oxide donor, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), is a candidate treatment for the management of acute stroke with haemodynamic and potential reperfusion and neuroprotective effects. When administered as a transdermal patch during the acute and subacute phases after stroke, GTN was safe, lowered blood pressure, maintained cerebral blood flow, and did not induce cerebral steal or alter functional outcome. However, when given within 6 h of stroke onset, GTN reduced death and dependency (odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.78), death, disability, cognitive impairment and mood disturbance, and improved quality of life (data from two trials, n = 312). In a pooled analysis of four studies (n = 186), GTN reduced between-visit systolic blood pressure variability over days 1–7 compared with no GTN (mean difference -2.09; 95% confidence interval -3.83 to -0.35; p = 0.019). The efficacy of GTN given in the ultra-acute/pre-hospital setting is currently being assessed and, if found to be beneficial, the implications for hyperacute stroke practice are significant. Here, we discuss the evidence to date, potential mechanisms of action and future possibilities, including unanswered questions, for the therapeutic potential of GTN in acute stroke

Definitions and pathophysiology of vasoplegic shock.

Vasoplegia is the syndrome of pathological low systemic vascular resistance, the dominant clinical feature of which is reduced blood pressure in the presence of a normal or raised cardiac output. The vasoplegic syndrome is encountered in many clinical scenarios, including septic shock, post-cardiac bypass and after surgery, burns and trauma, but despite this, uniform clinical definitions are lacking, which renders translational research in this area challenging. We discuss the role of vasoplegia in these contexts and the criteria that are used to describe it are discussed. Intrinsic processes which may drive vasoplegia, such as nitric oxide, prostanoids, endothelin-1, hydrogen sulphide and reactive oxygen species production, are reviewed and potential for therapeutic intervention explored. Extrinsic drivers, including those mediated by glucocorticoid, catecholamine and vasopressin responsiveness of the blood vessels, are also discussed. The optimum balance between maintaining adequate systemic vascular resistance against the potentially deleterious effects of treatment with catecholamines is as yet unclear, but development of novel vasoactive agents may facilitate greater understanding of the role of the differing pathways in the development of vasoplegia. In turn, this may provide insights into the best way to care for patients with this common, multifactorial condition

Effect of ACE inhibitors on endothelial dysfunction: Unanswered questions and implications for further investigation and therapy

Experimental studies have suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have an important role in blocking the progression of and/or reversing endothelial dysfunction. The extrapolation of these experimental studies to the clinical situation has, however, been disappointing. Studies of forearm-mediated endothelial vasodilatation in patients with hypertension with captopril, enalapril, and cilazapril have been negative. The finding of the Trial in Reversing Endothelial Dysfunction (TREND) that the administration of quinapril to normotensive patients with coronary artery disease in part restores endothelial-mediated coronary vasodilation, as assessed by intracoronary administration of acetylcholine, has important implications for future therapy and raises several important questions. The differences in the TREND and previous studies of ACE inhibitors on endothelial dysfunction may be due to mechanistic differences in endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension. Although in general there has been a good correlation between endothelial dysfunction as assessed by forearm flow and coronary endothelial dysfunction as assessed by acetylcholine, these vascular beds may be affected differently by therapeutic interventions, especially with an ACE inhibitor, which may affect sheart stress and angiotensin II formation in different vascular beds differently. Third, one needs to question whether the effect of quinapril on coronary endothelial dysfunction is a class effect or unique to quinapril. It will be necessary to test the effectiveness of other ACE inhibitors on coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans before concluding that the beneficial effects of quinapril are due to a class effect.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44542/1/10557_2004_Article_BF00051113.pd