10 research outputs found

    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine Myoepithelioma: A New Rearrangement Involving the Locus in a Case of Multiple Bone and Soft Tissue Lesions.

    No full text
    We report a case of multiple myoepithelioma with synchronous bone and soft tissue tumors, associated with a new genomic alteration of the locus. The lesions occurred in the foot by presenting one lump in the plantar soft tissue, and three lesions were detected in the calcaneus and in the navicular bone. All tumors showed the double immunophenotype of epithelial markers and S100 protein expression. No rearrangement of the and loci was detected as reported in myoepitheliomas. However, molecular karyotyping detected an unbalanced rearrangement of the locus, not involving the locus, which is the most frequent translocation partner observed in benign mesenchymal tumors such as lipomas (of soft tissue as well as parosteal) and pulmonary chondroid hamartoma

    A novel post-surgical prognostic system for colorectal liver metastases treated by preoperative systemic treatment, using tumoral and non tumoral pathological changes, RAS mutation and Immunoscore

    No full text
    Introduction : Surgical control of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) combined with systemic treatment in patients aims to maximize survival. However, around 40% of patients develop recurrence in one-year post operation. Moreover, chemotherapy-related liver injury (CALI), such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and steatohepatitis, have been reported to worsen operative mortality and morbidity rates. Aim : We aim to develop a prognostic scoring system to stratify patient prognosis post-hepatectomy by identifying the significant prognostic clinico-pathological-molecular factors in patients with resected CRLM. Methods: We investigated 143 patients with 403 CRLM operated from 2005-2013, including patients untreated (19 patients with 29 lesions) and treated with chemotherapy alone (33 patients with 91 lesions), chemotherapy with anti-VEGFR (47 patients with 157 lesions), and chemotherapy with anti-EGFR (44 patients with 126 lesions). All specimens were reviewed to assess tumor regression grading (TRG), histological growth pattern (HGP), and CALI. Genomic DNA from the lesions was extracted and purified from Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides. Immunoscore was assessed by the immune densities (cells/mm2) of CD3- and CD8 positive lymphocytes in the center and the invasive margin of the tumor by using morphometry. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Cumulative disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared by log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used for uni- and multi-variate analysis. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results : Multivariate analysis showed that a high TRG (TRG 3-5), the worst HGP (replace growth pattern, mixed pattern), ≥ 4 lesions, positive surgical margin, CALI (steatohepatitis, NRH), RAS mutation and the worst Immunoscore were the significant prognostic factors. The prognostic scoring system combining these parameters significantly stratified post-operatively treated patients’ prognosis into three groups (high risk group: 81.3% (63.1%-90.3% 95CI) one-year recurrence rate, intermediate risk group: 41.3% (26.8%-52.9% 95CI) one-year recurrence rate, low risk group: 13.8% (0.3%-25.5% 95CI) one-year recurrence rate). Conclusions : Our novel prognostic scoring system of CRLM assessed by tumor and non-tumor pathological changes, Ras mutation and Immunoscore, allowed us to identify the patient population with high risk of recurrence post-hepatectomy

    Pathological responses after angiogenesis or EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer depend on the chemotherapy backbone.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Optimal preoperative treatment before colorectal cancer metastases (CRCM) resection remains unclear. This study evaluated pathological responses (pR) in CRCM resected after chemotherapy alone or combined with angiogenesis or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. METHODS: Pathological response was retrospectively evaluated on 264 resected metastases from 99 patients. The proportion of responding metastases after different preoperative treatments was reported and compared. Patient's progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared based on pR. RESULTS: The combination of anti-angiogenics with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy resulted in more pR than when they were combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy (80% vs 50%; P<0.001). Inversely, the combination of EGFR inhibitors with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy seemed to induce fewer pR than when they were combined with irinotecan-based treatment (53% vs 72%; P=0.049). Overall survival at 5 years was improved for patients with a pR in all resected metastases compared with those who did not achieve a pR (68.5% vs 32.6%; P=0.023) and this response was the only factor predicting OS in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The chemotherapy partner combined with angiogenesis or EGFR inhibitors influenced pR in resected CRCM. In our exploratory analysis anti-angiogenic/oxaliplatin-based regimens and anti-EGFR/irinotecan-based regimens were associated with the highest pR. Prospective randomised trials should be performed to validate these observations

    Preoperative treatment to modify the immune microenvironnement of liver colorectal metastases.

    No full text
    Background: We previously reported that an adaptive Th1 immune response (CD3/CD8/CD45RO T-cells) observed in resected primary colorectal tumor and liver colorectal metastases (LCM) is an important prognostic factor. B and FoxP3 regulatory lymphocytes participate to the modulation of this response. We aimed to investigate whether the preoperative treatments influenced the quality and the density of the immune infiltrates previously reported in the LCM. Methods: We used a cohort of metastatic colorectal patients (n=107) engaged for curative liver surgery with available FFPE blocks for all resected LCM to confirm the prognostic impact of the immune response. Among this cohort of 338 LCMs, 46 were completely resected after chemotherapy (CT) alone, 130 after CT + anti-VEGF, 118 after CT + anti-EGFR and 44 after surgery alone. LCMs were analyzed for histological response according the Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) and regrouped as Response (R, TRG1-3) or No Response (NR, TRG4-5). The density of CD3+ (T-cells), CD8+ (cytotoxic), CD45RO+ (memory), CD20+ (B-cells) and FoxP3+ (regulatory) in the core (CT) and invasive margin (IM) of all LCM was quantified on immunostained slides. The mean density value (CT/IM) was calculated for each marker with a dedicated image analysis software on whole-slide imaging. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Results: LCMs showing R (compared to NR and untreated LCM) were more frequently associated with a high immune infiltrate for CD3+ (CT: p<0.005; IM: p<0.05), CD8+ (CT: p<0.005; IM: p<0.005) and CD20+ (CT: p<0.05). Conversely, high FoxP3+ density in the CT and IM was related to NR and untreated LCMs (p<0.01). LCMs treated with an anti-EGFR therapy showed higher densities of CD3+ (CT: p<0.005; IM: p<0.01), CD8+ (CT: p<0.005), CD45RO+ (CT: p<0.005), CD20+ (CT: p<0.005) and FoxP3+ (CT: p<0.05; IM: p<0.005) compared to other treatments and untreated LCMs. Conclusions: Preoperative treatment modifies the LCM immune microenvironnement. LCMs with a histological response show a cytotoxic immune response (CD3+/CD8+) with associated B-cells (CD20+) and downregulated Tregs (FoxP3+). The use of an anti-EGFR therapy significantly increases immune infiltration in the CT

    Randomized phase II studies comparing pathological responses observed on colorectal cancer metastases resected after preoperative treatment combining bevacizumab or cetuximab with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.

    No full text
    Background: Even if the use of targeted therapies combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated increase response rate and survival benefit in non resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the administration of these combinations in frontline resectable disease is source of debate and optimal association is still unclear. Based on a retrospective analysis, we previously reported thatthe chemotherapy partner combined with VEGF or EGFR inhibitors influenced pathological responses (pR) on the resected colorectal cancer metastases (CRCM) with a significant advantage for oxaliplatin with anti-VEGF or irinotecan with anti-EGFR combinations. We aimed to design 2 parallel studies (BEV-ONCO, CET-ONCO) to prospectively precise optimal combination between oxaliplatin and irinotecan with bevacizumab or cetuximab before CRCM resection. Methods: The 2 studies are open label randomized multi-centric trials and concern mCRC patients with resectable disease in whom a preoperative treatment is considered. The primary objective is to assess the CRCM pR rate according the Tumor Regression Grade classification (Rubbia-Brandt) after allocated preoperative treatment (bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX vs. FOLFIRI without consideration of RAS/BRAF for BEV-ONCO trial (EUDRACT 2012-005376-34) and cetuximab associated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI only for RAS/BRAF wild type tumor for CET-ONCO trial (EUDRACT 2012-005249-19)). According investigator’s choice, patient will received 3 to 6 treatment cycles before CRCM resection. Patient’s survival, safety, surgical complications and treatment associated liver-toxicity are secondary end-points. Up to 60 patients (30 per treatment group) will be randomised in each study (power: 80%, type I error of 5% to detect a difference in proportion of pR rate between FOLFOX or FOLFIRI association of 0.40). Formal comparison will not be done across studies. Translational research projects are ongoing (CRCM immune response, tumour specific genetic rearrangements as new specific biomarkers). Clinical trial information: NCT01858649 (BEV-ONCO); NCT01858662 (CET-ONCO). Clinical trial information: NCT01858649 (BEVONCO) NCT01858662 (CETONCO)

    Comprehensive Intrametastatic Immune Quantification and Major Impact of Immunoscore on Survival.

    No full text
    This study assesses how the metastatic immune landscape is impacting the response to treatment and the outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Complete curative resection of metastases (n = 441) was performed for two patient cohorts (n = 153). Immune densities were quantified in the center and invasive margin of all metastases. Immunoscore and T and B cell (TB) score were analyzed in relation to radiological and pathological responses and patient's disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. The spatial distribution of immune cells within metastases was nonuniform. Patients, as well as metastases of the same patient, had variable immune infiltrates and response to therapy. A beneficial response was statistically significantly associated with increased immune densities. Among all metastases, Immunoscore (I) and TB score evaluated in the least immune-infiltrated metastases were the strongest predictors for DFS and OS (five-year follow-up, Immunoscore: I 3-4: DFS rate = 27.9%, 95% CI = 15.2 to 51.3; vs I 0-1-2: DFS rate = 12.3%, 95% CI = 4.9 to 30.6; HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.70, P = .02; I 3-4: OS rate = 64.6%, 95% CI = 46.6 to 89.6; vs I 0-1-2: OS rate = 32.5%, 95% CI = 17.2 to 61.4; HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.66, P = .001, C-index = 65.9%; five-year follow-up, TB score: TB 3-4: DFS rate = 25.7%, 95% CI = 14.2 to 46.6; vs TB 0-1-2: DFS rate = 5.0%, 95% CI = 0.8 to 32.4; HR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.57, P < .001; TB 3-4: OS rate = 63.7%, 95% CI = 46.4 to 87.5; vs TB 0-1-2: OS rate: 21.4%, 95% CI = 9.2 to 49.8; HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.51, P < .001, C-index = 67.8%). High TB score and Immunoscore patients had a median survival of 70.5 months, while low patients survived only 25.1 to 38.3 months. Nonresponding patients with high-immune infiltrates had prolonged DFS (HR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.52, P = .001) and OS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.62, P = .001). The immune parameters remained the only statistically significant prognostic factor associated with DFS and OS in multivariable analysis (P < .001), while response to treatment was not. Response to treatment and prolonged survival of metastatic CRC patients were statistically significantly associated with high-immune densities quantified into the least immune-infiltrated metastasis
    corecore