Population-level risks of alcohol consumption by amount, geography, age, sex, and year: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2020

Background The health risks associated with moderate alcohol consumption continue to be debated. Small amounts of alcohol might lower the risk of some health outcomes but increase the risk of others, suggesting that the overall risk depends, in part, on background disease rates, which vary by region, age, sex, and year. Methods For this analysis, we constructed burden-weighted dose–response relative risk curves across 22 health outcomes to estimate the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL) and non-drinker equivalence (NDE), the consumption level at which the health risk is equivalent to that of a non-drinker, using disease rates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2020 for 21 regions, including 204 countries and territories, by 5-year age group, sex, and year for individuals aged 15–95 years and older from 1990 to 2020. Based on the NDE, we quantified the population consuming harmful amounts of alcohol. Findings The burden-weighted relative risk curves for alcohol use varied by region and age. Among individuals aged 15–39 years in 2020, the TMREL varied between 0 (95% uncertainty interval 0–0) and 0·603 (0·400–1·00) standard drinks per day, and the NDE varied between 0·002 (0–0) and 1·75 (0·698–4·30) standard drinks per day. Among individuals aged 40 years and older, the burden-weighted relative risk curve was J-shaped for all regions, with a 2020 TMREL that ranged from 0·114 (0–0·403) to 1·87 (0·500–3·30) standard drinks per day and an NDE that ranged between 0·193 (0–0·900) and 6·94 (3·40–8·30) standard drinks per day. Among individuals consuming harmful amounts of alcohol in 2020, 59·1% (54·3–65·4) were aged 15–39 years and 76·9% (73·0–81·3) were male. Interpretation There is strong evidence to support recommendations on alcohol consumption varying by age and location. Stronger interventions, particularly those tailored towards younger individuals, are needed to reduce the substantial global health loss attributable to alcohol. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Not Available

Not AvailableThe present study was undertaken with the objectives to study Drechslerella dactyloides NDAd-05 and Dactylaria brochopaga NDDb-15 mediated induction of structural defense responses leading to lower disease development and promoting growth in tomato pre-challenged with Meloidogyne incognita. The potential strains D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 were taken from Plant-Microbe Interaction and Rhizosphere Biology Lab, ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Kushmaur, Maunath Bhanjan, India. In vitro root colonization assay was performed using D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 in sand:soil culture (2:1) and significant tomato root colonization by NDAd-05 and NDDb-15 was recorded. The study elucidated multifarious effects of D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 when inoculated either individually or in combination in tomato plants pre-challenged with M. incognita. Additionally, D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 increased antioxidant as well as biocontrol activities significantly in tomato against M. incognita. Microscopic visualization of H2O2 and superoxide radicals in tomato leaves further corroborated the above findings. Further, inoculation of D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 activated the phenylpropanoid pathway in roots leading to increase cell wall lignifications and pectin deposition in tomato roots in addition to direct trapping and parasitizing of juveniles and adults of M. incognita. From the results it can be concluded that increased cell wall lignifications and pectin deposition probably restricted the entry of nematodes and ultimately decreased the M. incognita population in tomato roots. It was also observed that plants treated with bioagents individually or in combination modulated the phenotypical alterations and assisted plant growth promotion. This might be due to the interaction-dependent modulation of physio-biochemical pathways in the tomato plants which ultimately reduced the inoculum potential and disease intensity of M. incognita.Not Availabl

Not Available

Not AvailableThe present investigation was aimed to isolate and characterize the strains of Drechslerella dactyloides and Dactylaria brochopaga from decaying root galls of tomato in order to investigate their role in reprogramming of root apoplast that enhance defence responses in tomato pre-challenged with Meloidogyne incognita. Out of 23 strains of D. brochopaga and D. dactyloides were isolated from decaying root galls of tomato, three strains of D. dactyloides and five strains of D. brochopaga were found effective and these were selected for further characterization under controlled laboratory conditions. Further, D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 were found most promising strains for control of M. incognita. The study elucidates multifarious effects of D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 inoculated either individually or in combination on tomato plants pre-challenged with M. incognita under nethouse conditions. Results of this investigation revealed that inoculation of D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 increased various attributes in plants to significant degree conferring defence against M. incognita. Both the strains were found to have potential to enhance site-specific accumulation and activation of defence-related mediator molecules, enzymes and thus, exhibited biocontrol potential against M. incognita. Further, application of D. dactyloides NDAd-05 and D. brochopaga NDDb-15 not only assisted in the growth promotion but also activated phenylpropanoid pathway in root apoplast in addition to direct trapping of M. incognita.Not Availabl

Not Available

Not AvailableSeed is a basic and most important input for agriculture and high-quality seed is also required in international seed trading. There are many seed-borne diseases and pathogens that have negative impact on seed health and its quality. Seed-borne inoculums are the main source of primary infection leading to disease development. The disease gets established in the field wherever the infected seed is used and causes severe yield losses. Paul Neergaard is considered as father of seed pathology who has contributed a lot in the development of seed pathology. Seed-borne pathogenic microorganisms mainly fungi, viruses and bacteria are greatly affecting seed quality and cause diseases that affect seedling production in the nurseries. Management strategies for the control of various seed-borne diseases are mainly based on chemical seed treatment. Studies have been carried out with a view to find out the best way to use chemicals in seed production. Such studies are very few, and hence, there is a need to conduct further research so that new chemicals could be incorporated into seed-borne disease management programmes. We need to have additional ways to control diseases that are seed-borne, and chemical pesticides are effective against a wide spectrum of diseases. This chapter provides a brief review of seed-borne pathogen problems that affect seeds and discusses established and potential control practices by using chemicals like fungicides, insecticides or defence activators and further gives the future perspectives where focus should be given with respect to seed pathology and management of seed-borne disease.Not Availabl