Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL learners

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.This study analyzed the argumentative writing behavior of Iranian graduate learners of English as Foreign Language in their English essays. Further, the correlations between the use of argument elements and overall writing quality as well as soundness of produced arguments were investigated. To this end, 150 essays were analyzed. The sample essays were found to be predominantly deductive in terms of rhetorical pattern. Moreover, they mainly utilized ‘data’ and ‘claim’ most frequently with secondary elements of argument (i.e., counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data) as the least produced elements. Overall writing quality co-varied significantly positively with the uses of claims, data, counterargument claims, counterargument data, rebuttal claims, and rebuttal data. Essays rated high in terms of overall writing quality were further rated for soundness and relevance of the arguments. The results demonstrate that even for advanced language learners good surface structure cannot necessarily guarantee well thought-out logical structure. The pedagogical implications for writing instruction and research are discussed

Essai de varietes de tomates en recolte mecanique simulee. A. Pour le marche. B. Pour la conserve. Jonquieres St Vincent (30)

* INRA URD, Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914 Avignon cedex 9 Diffusion du document : INRA URD, Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914 Avignon cedex 9National audienc

REAL PARTS OF SCATTERING-AMPLITUDES AND REGGE PHENOMENOLOGY

no abstrac