77 research outputs found
Magnetic force microscope tip-induced remagnetization of CoPt nanodisks with perpendicular anisotropy
We report on the results of a magnetic force microscopy investigation of remagnetization processes in arrays of CoPt nanodisks with diameters of 35 and 200 nm and a thickness of 9.8 nm fabricated by e-beam lithography and ion etching. The controllable magnetization reversal of individual CoPt nanodisks by the magnetic force microscope (MFM) tip-induced magnetic field was demonstrated. We observed experimentally two essentially different processes of tip-induced remagnetization. Magnetization reversal of 200 nm disks was observed when the probe moved across the particle while in case of 35 nm nanodisks one-touch remagnetization was realized. Micromagnetic modeling based on the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation demonstrated that the tip-induced magnetization reversal occurs through the essentially inhomogeneous states. Computer simulations confirmed that in case of 200 nm disks the mechanism of embryo nucleation with reversed magnetization and further dynamic propagation following the probe moving across the particle was realized. On the other hand one-touch remagnetization of 35 nm disks occurs through the inhomogeneous vortexlike state. Micromagnetic LLG simulations showed that magnetization reversal in an inhomogeneous MFM probe field has a lower energy barrier in comparison with the mechanism of coherent rotation, which takes place in a homogeneous external magnetic field
A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy
To compare the efficacy and safety of SB4 (an etanercept biosimilar) with reference product etanercept (ETN) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS:This is a phase III, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study with a 24-week primary endpoint. Patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomised to receive weekly dose of 50 mg of subcutaneous SB4 or ETN. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 24. Other efficacy endpoints as well as safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic parameters were also measured. RESULTS: 596 patients were randomised to either SB4 (N=299) or ETN (N=297). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was 78.1% for SB4 and 80.3% for ETN. The 95% CI of the adjusted treatment difference was -9.41% to 4.98%, which is completely contained within the predefined equivalence margin of -15% to 15%, indicating therapeutic equivalence between SB4 and ETN. Other efficacy endpoints and pharmacokinetic endpoints were comparable. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable (55.2% vs 58.2%), and the incidence of antidrug antibody development up to week 24 was lower in SB4 compared with ETN (0.7% vs 13.1%). CONCLUSIONS:SB4 was shown to be equivalent with ETN in terms of efficacy at week 24. SB4 was well tolerated with a lower immunogenicity profile. The safety profile of SB4 was comparable with that of ETN
ΠΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Ρ
Π ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΠ· ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠΉ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ. Π¦Π΅ Π·ΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠΌ, ΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ³Π°ΡΡΡΡΡ Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Ρ ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡ Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ³Ρ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΉΠ½Ρ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°Π΄ 46% Π²ΡΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡΠ² Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ± Π² ΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎ 59% ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΠΎ Π·ΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΉΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ, ΡΠΊΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡ Π· Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΎΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΉΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ· ΡΡΠΆΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π΅Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΡΡΠ°Ρ. Π ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅. ΠΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ
Π² ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 46% Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 59% ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΉ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ. In modern conditions the problem of diseases of the circulatory system is one of the main positions in preventive medicine. This is due to the fact that in the realities of today in the world there is an epidemic of non-communicable diseases, which include diseases of the circulatory system. Noncommunicable diseases make up more than 46% of all cases in the world and account for about 59% of deaths due to medical causes. In the group of noncommunicable diseases, cardiovascular diseases, which are one of the major medical and social problems for all of humanity, occupy a leading position, as they have the highest prevalence, disability and mortality rates, occur with severe complications and lead to significant irreversible economic
Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and safety of the anti-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody otilimab (GSK3196165) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, phase 2b, dose-ranging study
The human monoclonal antibody otilimab inhibits granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a key driver in immune-mediated inflammatory conditions. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and key patient-reported outcomes related to pain in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving otilimab. Methods. This phase 2b, dose-ranging, multicentre, placebo-controlled study was done at 64 sites across 14 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving stable methotrexate were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) to subcutaneous placebo or otilimab 22Β·5 mg, 45 mg, 90 mg, 135 mg, or 180 mg, plus methotrexate, once weekly for 5 weeks, then every other week until week 50. The randomisation schedule was generated by the sponsor, and patients were assigned to treatment by interactive response technology. Randomisation was blocked (block size of six) but was not stratified. Investigators, patients, and the sponsor were blinded to treatment. An unblinded administrator prepared and administered the study drug. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved disease activity score for 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) 3Β·2 (week 24) escaped to otilimab 180 mg. Patients who escaped were treated as non-responders in their original assigned group. Safety endpoints were incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, infections, and pulmonary events. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504671. Findings.Between July 23, 2015, and Dec 29, 2017, 222 patients were randomly assigned (37 to each group). 86 (49%) of 175 escaped to otilimab 180 mg at week 12 and 57 (69%) of 83 at week 24. At week 24, the proportion of patients with DAS28-CRP <2Β·6 was two (5%) of 37 in the otilimab 22Β·5 mg group, six (16%) of 37 in the 45 mg group, seven (19%) of 37 in the 90 mg group, five (14%) of 37 in the 135 mg group, five (14%) of 37 in the 180 mg, and one (3%) of 37 in the placebo group. The largest difference was achieved with otilimab 90 mg (16Β·2%; odds ratio [OR] 8Β·39, 95% CI 0Β·98β72Β·14; p=0Β·053). Adverse events were reported pre-escape in 19β24 (51β65%) patients and post escape in 10β17 (40β61%) patients across otilimab dose groups and in 18 (49%) of 37 and 22 (67%) of 33 in the placebo group. The most common adverse event was nasopharyngitis: 3β9 (8β24%) in otilimab groups and one (3%) in the placebo group pre-escape and 1β3 (4β10%) in otilimab groups and seven (21%) in the placebo group post escape. Pre-escape serious adverse events were foot fracture (otilimab 45 mg); arthralgia, myocardial infarction, dizziness (otilimab 90 mg); oesophageal spasm, acute pyelonephritis (otilimab 22Β·5 mg), and uterine leiomyoma (otilimab 135 mg). Post-escape serious adverse events were ankle fracture (placebo) and rheumatoid arthritis (otilimab 135 mg). There were no deaths or pulmonary events of clinical concern, and rates of serious infection were low. Interpretation. Otilimab plus methotrexate was well tolerated and, despite not achieving the primary endpoint of DAS28-CRP remission, there were improvements compared with placebo in disease activity scores. Of note, patients reported significant improvement in pain and physical function, supporting further clinical development of otilimab in rheumatoid arthritis
Planning of effective evaluation of the activities of hospital district at the example of Poltava region
ΠΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ· ΠΏΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΊΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π³ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°Π΄ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²'Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΊΡ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΡ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΌ, ΡΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π² Π·ΠΌΠΎΠ·Ρ Π·Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ
ΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ½Π°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π· ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΡΠ². Π ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ½Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎ Π±Π°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³Ρ. ΠΡΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Ρ ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²'Ρ ΡΠΊΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ° ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° Π²ΡΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΡΡΡ
ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³Π° ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π±Π°Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ, Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΡ
Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Increasing of the availability and quality of health care in rural areas is one of the priority directions of public health and regional development policy. The need for reforming of the network of secondary health care facilities is due to the fact, that they are unable to meet the needs of the population in this specialized type of medical care in the conditions of the existing structure and funding system. Hospital districts are created with the aim of optimizing of the organization and functioning of the network of health facilities. The Management Boardβs decision should be based on valid, reliable information on the development of the hospital district. Compliance with the monitoring and evaluation methodology makes it possible to provide the health care system with qualitative and timely data at all stages of its reformation
- β¦