15 research outputs found

    Identifying the mechanisms of intron gain: progress and trends

    Get PDF
    Continued improvements in Next-Generation DNA/RNA sequencing coupled with advances in gene annotation have provided researchers access to a plethora of annotated genomes. Subsequent analyses of orthologous gene structures have identified numerous intron gain and loss events that have occurred both recently and in the very distant past. This research has afforded exceptional insight into the temporal and lineage-specific rates of intron gain and loss among various species throughout evolution. Numerous studies have also attempted to identify the molecular mechanisms of intron gain and loss. However, even after considerable effort, very little is known about these processes. In particular, the mechanism(s) of intron gain have proven exceptionally enigmatic and remain topics of considerable debate. Currently, there exists no definitive consensus as to what mechanism(s) may generate introns. Because many introns are known to affect gene expression, it is necessary to understand the molecular process(es) by which introns may be gained. Here we review the seven most commonly purported mechanisms of intron gain and, when possible, summarize molecular evidence for or against the occurrence of each of these mechanisms. Furthermore, we catalogue indirect evidence that supports the occurrence of each mechanism. Finally, because these proposed mechanisms fail to explain the mechanistic origin of many recently gained introns, we also look at trends that may aid researchers in identifying other potential mechanism(s) of intron gain.This article was reviewed by Eugene Koonin, Scott Roy (nominated by W. Ford Doolittle), and John Logsdon. © 2012 Yenerall and Zhou; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

    Determining the Locations of Dust Sources in FeLoBAL Quasars

    Full text link
    We conduct a spectroscopic search of quasars observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) with broad absorption line (BAL) troughs due to Mg II and troughs due to Fe II that simultaneously exhibit strong Balmer narrow emission lines (NELs). We find that in a redshift range of 0.4 less than or equal to z less than or equal to 0.9 approximately 23 of the 70 Mg II BALs and 4 of a subset of 15 Fe II BALs exhibit strong Balmer emission. We also find significant fractions of Mg II BALs (approximately 23%) and those Mg II BALs with Fe II troughs (approximately 27%) have strong continuum reddening, E(B - V) greater than or equal to 0.1. From measurements of the Balmer decrement in three objects, we find similarly significant reddening of the NEL region in three of the four objects; the NELs in the fourth object are not measurable. We also include one object in this study not taken from the SDSS sample that shows Fe II absorption and strong narrow emission, but due to measurement uncertainty and low continuum reddening the comparison is consistent but inconclusive. We find a trend in both the Mg II and Fe II BAL samples between the NEL reddening and continuum reddening. Because the narrow line reddening is consistent with the continuum reddening in every object in the two SDSS samples, it suggests that the reddening sources in these objects likely exist at larger radial distances than the narrow line regions from the central nucleus.Comment: 40 manuscript pages, accepted in ApJ (July

    Taxane-Platin-Resistant Lung Cancers Co-develop Hypersensitivity to JumonjiC Demethylase Inhibitors

    Get PDF
    Although non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients benefit from standard taxane-platin chemotherapy, many relapse, developing drug resistance. We established preclinical taxane-platin-chemoresistance models and identified a 35-gene resistance signature, which was associated with poor recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant-treated NSCLC patients and included upregulation of the JumonjiC lysine demethylase KDM3B. In fact, multi-drug-resistant cells progressively increased the expression of many JumonjiC demethylases, had altered histone methylation, and, importantly, showed hypersensitivity to JumonjiC inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. Increasing taxane-platin resistance in progressive cell line series was accompanied by progressive sensitization to JIB-04 and GSK-J4. These JumonjiC inhibitors partly reversed deregulated transcriptional programs, prevented the emergence of drug-tolerant colonies from chemo-naive cells, and synergized with standard chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Our findings reveal JumonjiC inhibitors as promising therapies for targeting taxane-platin-chemoresistant NSCLCs.Fil: Dalvi, Maithili P.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Wang, Lei. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Zhong, Rui. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Kollipara, Rahul K.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Park, Hyunsil. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Bayo Fina, Juan Miguel. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados Unidos. Universidad Austral. Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional; ArgentinaFil: Yenerall, Paul. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Zhou, Yunyun. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Timmons, Brenda C.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Rodriguez Canales, Jaime. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Behrens, Carmen. Md Anderson Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Mino, Barbara. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Villalobos, Pamela. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Parra, Edwin R.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Suraokar, Milind. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Pataer, Apar. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Swisher, Stephen G.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Kalhor, Neda. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Bhanu, Natarajan V.. University of Pennsylvania; Estados UnidosFil: Garcia, Benjamin A.. University of Pennsylvania; Estados UnidosFil: Heymach, John V.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Coombes, Kevin. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Xie, Yang. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Girard, Luc. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Gazdar, Adi F.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Kittler, Ralf. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Wistuba, Ignacio I.. University of Texas; Estados UnidosFil: Minna, John D.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Martinez, Elisabeth D.. University of Texas. Southwestern Medical Center; Estados Unido
    corecore