106 research outputs found

    Pilot performance of a dedicated prostate PET suitable for diagnosis and biopsy guidance

    Full text link
    [EN] Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most common types of cancers facing the male population. Nowadays, to confirm PCa, systematic or multiparametric MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsies of the prostate are required. However, due to the lack of an accurate imaging technique capable to precisely locate cancerous cells in the prostate, ultrasound biopsies sample random parts of the prostate and, therefore, it is possible to miss regions where those cancerous cells are present. In spite of the improvement with multiparametric MRI, the low reproducibility of its reading undermines the specificity of the method. Recent development of prostatespecific radiotracers has grown the interest on using positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for this purpose, but technological improvements are still required (current scanners have resolutions in the range of 4¿5 mm). Results: The main goal of this work is to improve state-of-the-art PCa imaging and diagnosis. We have focused our efforts on the design of a novel prostate-dedicated PET scanner, named ProsPET. This system has small scanner dimensions defined by a ring of just 41 cm inner diameter. In this work, we report the design, implementation, and evaluation (both through simulations and real data) of the ProsPET scanner. We have been able to achieve < 2 mm resolution in reconstructed images and high sensitivity. In addition, we have included a comparison with the Philips Gemini-TF scanner, which is used for routine imaging of PCa patients. The ProsPET exhibits better contrast, especially for rod sizes as small as 4.5 mm in diameter. Finally, we also show the first reconstructed image of a PCa patient acquired with the ProsPET. Conclusions: We have designed and built a prostate specific PET system, with a small footprint and improved spatial resolution when compared to conventional whole-body PET scanners. The gamma ray impact within each detector block includes accurate DOI determination, correcting for the parallax error. The potential role of combined organdedicated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and ultrasound devices, as a prebiopsy diagnostic tool, could be used to guide sampling of the most aggressive sites in the prostate.The work presented in this article has been partially funded by a research grant from the regional government of the Comunitat Valenciana (Spain), co-funded by the European Union ERDF funds (European Regional Development Fund) of the Comunitat Valenciana 2014-2020, with reference IDIFEDER/2018/032 (High-Performance Algorithms for the Modelling, Simulation and early Detection of diseases in Personalized Medicine). This project has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 695536). It has also been supported by the EU Grant 603002 under the FP7 program and by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad under Grant e and through PROSPET (DTS15/00152) funded by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad.Cañizares-Ledo, G.; Gonzalez-Montoro, A.; Freire, M.; Lamprou, E.; Barrio, J.; Sánchez Martínez, F.; Benlloch Baviera, JM.... (2020). Pilot performance of a dedicated prostate PET suitable for diagnosis and biopsy guidance. EJNMMI Physics. 7(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00305-yS11771GLOBOCAN 2018. http://www.gco.iarc.fr/today/ datasources-methods. Accessed 26 Dec 2019.Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN. Int J Cancer. 2012;2015:136–E359.Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89.Smith JA, et al. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Urology. 1997;157(3):902.Smeenge M, et al. Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a consensus panel. BJU Int. 2012:110–942.Drost FJH, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012663.European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer . Accessed 26 Dec 2019.Segall G, et al. SNM practice guideline for sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT bone scans. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1813.Yamamoto Y, et al. Feasibility of tailored, selective and effective anticancer chemotherapy by direct injection of docetaxel-loaded immunoliposomes into Her2/neu positive gastric tumor xenografts. Int J Oncol. 2011;38(1):33.Chen L, et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound: enhancement of intratumoral uptake of [H]-docetaxel in vivo. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(24):–7399.Osborne JR, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging. Seminars and Original Investigations: Urologic Oncology; 2012.Gonzalez AJ, et al. Organ-dedicated molecular imaging systems. IEEE Trans. Rad. Plasma Med. Scie. 2018;2:388.Majewski S, Proffitt J. Dedicated mobile high resolution prostate PET imager with an insertable transrectal probe. US Patent. 2010;7:858–944.Weinberg IN, et al. Flexible geometries for hand-held PET and SPECT cameras. IEEE NSS-MIC Conference Record. 2002.Weinberg I. Dedicated apparatus and method for positron emission tomography of the prostate. US Patent. 2006;7:102–34.Gonzalez-Montoro A, et al. Performance study of a large monolithic LYSO PET detector with accurate photon DOI using retroreflector layers. IEEE Trans. Rad. Plasma Med. Scie. 2017;1:229.Gonzalez-Montoro A, et al. Detector block performance based on a monolithic LYSO crystal using a novel signal multiplexing method. Nucl Instrum Meth. 2018;912:372-77.Gonzalez-Montoro A, et al. Performance comparison of large-area SiPM arrays suitable for gamma ray detectors. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2019;5:045013.Seimetz M, et al. Correction algorithms for signal reduction in insensitive areas of a small gamma camera. J Instrum. 2014;9(05):C05042.Freire M, et al. Calibration of gamma ray impacts in monolithic-based detectors using Voronoi diagrams. In IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2019.2947716 .Jan S, et al. GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:4543–61.Merlin T, et al. CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(18):5505.Jacobs F, et al. A fast algorithm to calculate the exact radiological path through a pixel or voxel space. J Comput Inf Technol. 1998;6(1).Gonzalez-Montoro A, et al. Novel method to measure the intrinsic spatial resolution in PET detectors based on monolithic crystals. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2019;920:39(9).Vicente E, et al. Normalization in 3D PET: dependence on the activity distribution of the source. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 2006:M06–379.Soriano A, et al. Attenuation correction without transmission scan for the MAMMI breast PET. Nucl Instrum Meth A. 2011;648:S75.Yushkevich PA, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;34(3):1116-28.Gonzalez AJ, et al. Initial results of the MINDView PET insert inside the 3T mMR. IEEE Trans Rad Plasma Med Scie. 2019;3:343.Suti S, et al. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(3):471–80.Watson C, et al. NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:822.National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA NU 4-2008. Performance measurements of small animal positron emission tomographs. 2008.Gonzalez AJ, et al. A PET design based on SiPM and monolithic LYSO crystals: performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Nucl Scie. 2016;63:2471.Barbosa FG. Clinical perspectives of PSMA PET/MRI for prostate cancer. Clinics. 2018;73(Suppl 1):e586s.Uprimny C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):941-49.Koerber SA, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate: correlation of intraprostatic PSMA uptake with several clinical parameters. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(12):1943–8

    Role of biologics and biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: current trends and future perspectives

    No full text
    Prashanth Rawla,1 Tagore Sunkara,2 Jeffrey Pradeep Raj3 1Department of Internal Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Martinsville and Henry County, Martinsville, VA, 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Clinical Affiliate of The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; 3Department of Pharmacology, St John&rsquo;s Medical College, Bangalore, India Abstract: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal system. The spectrum is of predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn&rsquo;s disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily since 1990, and so the number of agents used in their treatment. Biologics that are derived partly or completely from living biological sources such as animals and humans have become widely available, which provide therapeutic benefits to the IBD patients. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab) are approved for use in IBD. Biosimilars of infliximab and adalimumab are also available for the treatment of IBD. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacology, studies leading to their approval, overall indications and their use in IBD, usage in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects of these agents. This review also summarizes the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics and biosimilars in IBD. Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn&rsquo;s disease, ulcerative colitis, biologics, biosimilars, tumor necrosis factor, integrin, interleukin, adalimumab, Humira&reg;, certolizumab, Cimzia&reg;, golimumab, Simponi&reg;, infliximab, Remicade&reg;, vedolizumab, Entyvio, natalizumab, Tysabri&reg;, ustekinumab, Stelara&reg;&nbsp

    Fecal microbiota transplant &ndash; a new frontier in inflammatory bowel disease

    No full text
    Tagore Sunkara,1 Prashanth Rawla,2 Andrew Ofosu,1 Vinaya Gaduputi3 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Sovah Health, Martinsville, VA, USA; 3Division of Gastroenterology, SBH Health System, Bronx, NY, USA Abstract: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic multifactorial disease that affects the gastrointestinal tract and results from an aberrant immune response toward luminal antigens in genetically susceptible people. Most of the current therapies for IBD focus on the management of the inflammation by using corticosteroids, immune modulators, and more recently, monoclonal antibodies (biological therapy). Although these therapies provide benefit in most cases, there are still a significant number of patients who do not respond or become refractory over time, suggesting the need for alternative therapeutic options. In the last decade, it has been recognized that &ldquo;dysbiosis,&rdquo; an imbalanced gut microbiota, is a key element in IBD suggesting microbiome-based therapies as an attractive approach. Recently, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been successfully used for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, and it is now under investigation for the treatment of IBD. Clinical trials data are still poor but strongly support a future introduction of FMT in therapy to manage IBD microbiome. More studies are needed to assess the optimal route of administration and the frequency of FMT, the best matched donor for each patient as well as the risks associated with FMT in IBD. Keywords: fecal microbiota transplant, FMT, inflammatory bowel disease, IBD, microbiome, dysbiosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn&rsquo;s diseas

    Assessments of in vitro

    No full text
    corecore