A simple two-module problem to exemplify building-block assembly under crossover

Theoretically and empirically it is clear that a genetic algorithm with crossover will outperform a genetic algorithm without crossover in some fitness landscapes, and vice versa in other landscapes. Despite an extensive literature on the subject, and recent proofs of a principled distinction in the abilities of crossover and non-crossover algorithms for a particular theoretical landscape, building general intuitions about when and why crossover performs well when it does is a different matter. In particular, the proposal that crossover might enable the assembly of good building-blocks has been difficult to verify despite many attempts at idealized building-block landscapes. Here we show the first example of a two-module problem that shows a principled advantage for cross-over. This allows us to understand building-block assembly under crossover quite straightforwardly and build intuition about more general landscape classes favoring crossover or disfavoring it

Bridging Elementary Landscapes and a Geometric Theory of Evolutionary Algorithms: First Steps

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer via the DOI in this record.Paper to be presented at the Fifteenth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN XV), Coimbra, Portugal on 8-12 September.Based on a geometric theory of evolutionary algorithms, it was shown that all evolutionary algorithms equipped with a geometric crossover and no mutation operator do the same kind of convex search across representations, and that they are well matched with generalised forms of concave fitness landscapes for which they provably find the optimum in polynomial time. Analysing the landscape structure is essential to understand the relationship between problems and evolutionary algorithms. This paper continues such investigations by considering the following challenge: develop an analytical method to recognise that the fitness landscape for a given problem provably belongs to a class of concave fitness landscapes. Elementary landscapes theory provides analytic algebraic means to study the landscapes structure. This work begins linking both theories to better understand how such method could be devised using elementary landscapes. Examples on well known One Max, Leading Ones, Not-All-Equal Satisfiability and Weight Partitioning problems illustrate the fundamental concepts supporting this approach

A Unifying View on Recombination Spaces and Abstract Convex Evolutionary Search

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer via the DOI in this record.Proceedings of EvoCOP 2019 - 19th European Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 24-26 April 2019, Leipzig, GermanyPrevious work proposed to unify an algebraic theory of fitness landscapes and a geometric framework of evolutionary algorithms (EAs). One of the main goals behind this unification is to develop an analytical method that verifies if a problem's landscape belongs to certain abstract convex landscapes classes, where certain recombination-based EAs (without mutation) have polynomial runtime performance. This paper advances such unification by showing that: (a) crossovers can be formally classified according to geometric or algebraic axiomatic properties; and (b) the population behaviour induced by certain crossovers in recombination-based EAs can be formalised in the geometric and algebraic theories. These results make a significant contribution to the basis of an integrated geometric-algebraic framework with which analyse recombination spaces and recombination-based EAs

The topology of evolutionary biology

Central notions in evolutionary biology are intrinsically topological. This claim is maybe most obvious for the discontinuities associated with punctuated equilibria. Recently, a mathematical framework has been developed that derives the concepts of phenotypic characters and homology from the topological structure of the phenotype space. This structure in turn is determined by the genetic operators and their interplay with the properties of the genotype-phenotype map