29 research outputs found
Regional Financial Arrangements in the Global Financial Safety Net: The Arab Monetary Fund and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development
Les figures de l'ordre juridique dans les relations entre le droit et son environnement
La question posĂ©e est celle des interfaces entre le systĂšme juridique et la sociĂ©tĂ©. Le contexte social du droit nâest pas pris ici comme surdĂ©terminant, le droit se dĂ©veloppant de maniĂšre autorĂ©fĂ©rentielle, dans une mesure, certes limitĂ©e, limites quâil convient prĂ©cisĂ©ment dâanalyser. Il y a entre le systĂšme social et le systĂšme juridique une circulation constante dâinformations, qui passent par ce que nous appelons les figures juridiques. Celles-ciâle lĂ©gislateur, le juge ou le sujet de droitâsont en situation de choisir dans le contexte social ce quâelles dĂ©cident dây prendre pour lui donner statut de norme. En cela, la figure juridique fait acte politique: elle ne prend pas le contexte auquel elle fait face comme un donnĂ© «naturel» qui sâimposerait Ă elle univoquement, mais elle choisit dans la complexitĂ© de ce contexte ce qui lui semble correspondre Ă lâunivers juridique auquel elle appartient. Cela est possible de par sa position mĂȘme dans chacun des deux universâcâest sa vĂ©ritable situationâdâun cĂŽtĂ© comme fonction juridique et de lâautre, mais en mĂȘme temps, comme acteur social: elle a Ă dire ce qui peut passer de lâun Ă lâautre, elle ne rĂ©pĂšte pas ce que lâun ou lâautre dit; elle se trouve en situation parce quâelle est le lieu de passage entre deux mondes non concomitants dans leur existence propre, mais entre lesquels elle a Ă faire correspondre un discours qui donne et prenne sens
Endogenous megakaryocytic colonies underline association between megakaryocytes and calreticulin mutations in essential thrombocythemia
Perceived Out-Group (Dis)Continuity and Attribution of Responsibility for the Lebanese Civil War Mediate Effects of National and Religious Subgroup Identification on Intergroup Attitudes
Successful reconciliation between groups following a violent conflict requires psychological change. We test a model predicting intergroup attitudes towards Muslims in Lebanon among Maronite (Christian) Lebanese youths. Identification with both their religious subgroup and with the superordinate national group predicted attitudes towards Muslims, in opposite directions. These effects of levels of identification on intergroup attitudes were mediated by attributions of responsibility for the war (Muslim responsibility) and perception that the current generation of out-group members is different from the war generation (perceived out-group discontinuity). Identification with Lebanon fosters positive attitudes towards Muslims by lowering Muslim responsibility for the war, and by increasing perceptions of foreign responsibility and perceived out-group discontinuity. In contrast, increased identification with their own religious subgroup undermines attitude change by increasing Muslim responsibility for the war and lessening perception of out-group discontinuity. Representations of the past have implications for attitudes towards former enemies and reconciliation in the present.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe