14 research outputs found
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Electronic health record (EHR) implementation is currently underway in Canada, as in many other countries. These ambitious projects involve many stakeholders with unique perceptions of the implementation process. EHR users have an important role to play as they must integrate the EHR system into their work environments and use it in their everyday activities. Users hold valuable, first-hand knowledge of what can limit or contribute to the success of EHR implementation projects. A comprehensive synthesis of EHR users' perceptions is key to successful future implementation. This systematic literature review was aimed to synthesize current knowledge of the barriers and facilitators influencing shared EHR implementation among its various users.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Covering a period from 1999 to 2009, a literature search was conducted on nine electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on users' perceived barriers and facilitators to shared EHR implementation, in healthcare settings comparable to Canada. Studies in all languages with an empirical study design were included. Quality and relevance of the studies were assessed. Four EHR user groups were targeted: physicians, other health care professionals, managers, and patients/public. Content analysis was performed independently by two authors using a validated extraction grid with pre-established categorization of barriers and facilitators for each group of EHR users.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of a total of 5,695 potentially relevant publications identified, 117 full text publications were obtained after screening titles and abstracts. After review of the full articles, 60 publications, corresponding to 52 studies, met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent adoption factors common to all user groups were design and technical concerns, ease of use, interoperability, privacy and security, costs, productivity, familiarity and ability with EHR, motivation to use EHR, patient and health professional interaction, and lack of time and workload. Each user group also identified factors specific to their professional and individual priorities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This systematic review presents innovative research on the barriers and facilitators to EHR implementation. While important similarities between user groups are highlighted, differences between them demonstrate that each user group also has a unique perspective of the implementation process that should be taken into account.</p
Evaluation of a pressure head and pressure zones in water distribution systems by artificial neural networks
Rheological behavior of ÎČ-Ti and NiTi powders produced by atomization for SLM production of open porous orthopedic implants
Diversification of TOLLIP isoforms in mouse and man
The Toll-interacting protein TOLLIP is an ubiquitin-binding protein that interacts with several components of the Toll-like receptor signaling cascade. The canonical protein consists of three annotated domains: an N-terminal TBD-loop-coil domain that mediates protein-protein interactions, a C2 domain that targets TOLLIP to the endosome, and a CUE domain at the C-terminus that binds monoubiquitin. TOLLIP has been described primarily in trafficking of the interleukin-1 receptor (IL1R) and turnover of the interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK), so it is an essential regulator of inflammatory signaling. Here we describe the expression of numerous alternate transcripts from mouse and human TOLLIP, which are predicted to generate at least five variant proteins between the two species. Most of the variant proteins are predicted to have altered N-terminal domains, altered TBD-loop-coil domains, or a truncated C2 domain. A mouse-specific variant arises from an alternate termination exon, and the resulting protein lacks the CUE domain. Two transcripts arising from alternate initiating exons are highly conserved between mouse and human but exhibit different patterns of expression. The consequent protein isoforms retain (TOLLIP.A) or lack (TOLLIP.D) the protein-binding TBD, so are predicted to traffic monoubiquitinated proteins to alternate protein complexes within the endosomal compartment. In summary, the widespread and inducible expression of Tollip isoforms predicts diversification of its function in rodent and human immune systems. Alternate splicing of critical signaling molecules such as Tollip may provide one mechanism behind the broad repertoire of responses generated by cells of the innate immune system in response to infection