Charged and Hydrophobic Surfaces on the A Chain of Shiga-Like Toxin 1 Recognize the C-Terminal Domain of Ribosomal Stalk Proteins

Shiga-like toxins are ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIP) produced by pathogenic E. coli strains that are responsible for hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome. The catalytic A1 chain of Shiga-like toxin 1 (SLT-1), a representative RIP, first docks onto a conserved peptide SD[D/E]DMGFGLFD located at the C-terminus of all three eukaryotic ribosomal stalk proteins and halts protein synthesis through the depurination of an adenine base in the sarcin-ricin loop of 28S rRNA. Here, we report that the A1 chain of SLT-1 rapidly binds to and dissociates from the C-terminal peptide with a monomeric dissociation constant of 13 µM. An alanine scan performed on the conserved peptide revealed that the SLT-1 A1 chain interacts with the anionic tripeptide DDD and the hydrophobic tetrapeptide motif FGLF within its sequence. Based on these 2 peptide motifs, SLT-1 A1 variants were generated that displayed decreased affinities for the stalk protein C-terminus and also correlated with reduced ribosome-inactivating activities in relation to the wild-type A1 chain. The toxin-peptide interaction and subsequent toxicity were shown to be mediated by cationic and hydrophobic docking surfaces on the SLT-1 catalytic domain. These docking surfaces are located on the opposite face of the catalytic cleft and suggest that the docking of the A1 chain to SDDDMGFGLFD may reorient its catalytic domain to face its RNA substrate. More importantly, both the delineated A1 chain ribosomal docking surfaces and the ribosomal peptide itself represent a target and a scaffold, respectively, for the design of generic inhibitors to block the action of RIPs

Interaction of elongation factor eEF-2 with ribosomal P proteins.

International audienceThe eukaryotic P1 and P2 ribosomal proteins which constitute, with P0, a pentamer forming the lateral stalk of the 60 S ribosomal subunit, exhibit several differences from their prokaryotic equivalents L7 and L12; in particular, P1 does not have the same primary structure as P2 and both of them are phosphorylated, the significance of the latter remaining unclear. Rat liver P1 and P2 were overproduced in Escherichia coli cells and their interaction with elongation factor eEF-2 was studied. Both recombinant proteins were found to be required for the ribosome-dependent GTPase activity of eEF-2, with P2 in the phosphorylated form. The surface plasmon resonance technique revealed that, in vitro, both proteins interact specifically with eEF-2, with a higher affinity for P1 (Kd = 3.8 x 10-8 m) than for P2 (Kd = 2.2 x 10-6 m). Phosphorylation resulted in a moderate increase (two- to four-fold) in these affinities. The interaction of both P1 and P2 (phosphorylated or not) with eEF-2 resulted in a conformational change in the factor, revealed by an increase in the accessibility of Glu554 to proteinase Glu-C. This increase was observed in both the presence and absence of GTP and GDP, which themselves produced marked opposite effects on the conformation of eEF-2. Our results suggest that the two proteins P1 and P2 both interact with eEF-2 inducing a conformational transition of the factor, but have acquired some specific properties during evolution.The eukaryotic P1 and P2 ribosomal proteins which constitute, with P0, a pentamer forming the lateral stalk of the 60 S ribosomal subunit, exhibit several differences from their prokaryotic equivalents L7 and L12; in particular, P1 does not have the same primary structure as P2 and both of them are phosphorylated, the significance of the latter remaining unclear. Rat liver P1 and P2 were overproduced in Escherichia coli cells and their interaction with elongation factor eEF-2 was studied. Both recombinant proteins were found to be required for the ribosome-dependent GTPase activity of eEF-2, with P2 in the phosphorylated form. The surface plasmon resonance technique revealed that, in vitro, both proteins interact specifically with eEF-2, with a higher affinity for P1 (Kd = 3.8 x 10-8 m) than for P2 (Kd = 2.2 x 10-6 m). Phosphorylation resulted in a moderate increase (two- to four-fold) in these affinities. The interaction of both P1 and P2 (phosphorylated or not) with eEF-2 resulted in a conformational change in the factor, revealed by an increase in the accessibility of Glu554 to proteinase Glu-C. This increase was observed in both the presence and absence of GTP and GDP, which themselves produced marked opposite effects on the conformation of eEF-2. Our results suggest that the two proteins P1 and P2 both interact with eEF-2 inducing a conformational transition of the factor, but have acquired some specific properties during evolution