Risperidone in the treatment of conduct disorder in preschool children without intellectual disability

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4^thedition Textrevision) highlights the especially poor outcomes of early-onset conduct disorder (CD). The strong link between the patient's age at treatment and its efficacy points the importance of early intervention. Risperidone is one of the most commonly studied medications used to treat CD in children and adolescents. The aim of this study is to obtain preliminary data about the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone treatment in otherwise typically developing preschool children with conduct disorder and severe behavioral problems.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>We recruited 12 otherwise normally developing preschoolers (ten boys and two girls) with CD for this study. We could not follow up with 4 children at control visits properly; thus, 8 children (six girls, two boys; mean age: 42.4 months) completed the study. We treated the patients with risperidone in an open-label fashion for 8 weeks, starting with a daily dosage of 0.125 mg/day or 0.25 mg/day depending on the patient's weight (<20 kg children: 0.125 mg/day; >20 kg children: 0.25 mg/day). Dosage titration and increments were performed at 2-week interval clinical assessments. The Turgay DSM-IV Based Disruptive Behavior Disorders Child and Adolescent Rating & Screening Scale (T-DSM-IV-S) as well as the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed treatment efficacy; the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) and laboratory evaluations assessed treatment safety.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean daily dosage of risperidone at the end of 8 weeks was 0.78 mg/day (SD: 0.39) with a maximum dosage of 1.50 mg/day. Based on the CGI global improvement item, we classified all patients as "responders" (very much or much improved). Risperidone was associated with a 78% reduction in the CGI Severity score. We also detected significant improvements on all of the subscales of the T-DSM-IV-S. Tolerability was good, and serious adverse effects were not observed. We detected statistically significant prolactin level increments (p < 0.05), but no clinical symptoms associated with prolactinemia.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results of this study suggest that risperidone may be an effective and well-tolerated atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of CD in otherwise normally developing preschool children. The findings of the study should be interpreted as preliminary data considering its small sample size and open-label methodology.</p

Effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole in a real-world outpatient population of youth [Günlük uygulamada ayaktan tedavi gören bir ergen hasta popülasyonunda aripiprazolün etkinlik ve tolerabilitesi]

Objectives: To identify the pattern of initiation for offlabel use of aripiprazole among adolescent outpatients; determine whether or not aripiprazole is effective and tolerable for the treatment of adolescents with a wide range of psychiatric symptoms and disorders or not. Methods: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole. The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale were used. Results: The data were available on 31 patients. The sample consisted of mostly females (87.1%). The mean age was 16.38±1.14 years, and the ages range was 15-19 years. Twenty-one patients (67.8%) had at least one comorbid disorder. The most common comorbid disorder was major depressive disorder. The mean initial dosage of aripiprazole was 4.83±3.59 mg (2.50 mg - 20.00 mg), and the mean endpoint dosage was 8.62±3.46 mg (2.50 mg - 15.00 mg). The mean duration of aripiprazole medication was 19.56±1.23 months (range: 4-48 months). Endpoint CGI-S scores were significantly lower compared with baseline CGI-S score (p<0.001). Similarly, the difference between depression severity (z=-3.232; p=0.001), anxiety severity (z=-3.004; p=0.003), hostility severity (z=-3.207; p=0.001), psychoticism severity (z=-1.973; p=0.049), and paranoid ideation severity (z=2.733; p=0.006) scores were statistically significant. The difference between the baseline and endpoint BSI Global Indices of distress scores were found to be statistically significant (The Global Severity Index: z=-2.987; p=0.003, the Positive Symptom Distress Index: z=-3.435; p=0.001, and the Positive Symptom Total: z=-3.023; p=0.003). Six cases (20.0%) discontinued the treatment. The most frequent adverse effects were asthenia (50.0%), somnolence (42.9%), and dizziness (39.30%). The most severe extrapyramidal symptoms were: impression of slowness or weakness, difficulty in carrying out routine tasks (11.5%), and tonic muscular contractions localized to one or several muscle groups, particularly in the throat, neck or back (11.5%). None of the cases had abnormal involuntary movements (dyskinesia) of the extremities or trunk. Conclusion: Aripiprazole was well tolerated and effective in our clinical practice and appears to be a safe and efficacious alternative in adolescents. However, a prospective clinical trial with a randomized controlled design is warranted

A new challenge for child psychiatrists: Inpatient care management during coronavirus pandemic

[No abstract available

Anesthesia for Ventricular Assist Device Placement: Experience From a Single Center

9th Congress of the Turkish-Transplantation-Centers-Coordination-Association (TTCCA) -- SEP 26-29, 2012 -- Bursa, TURKEYWOS: 000318457000041PubMed ID: 23622609Background. Circulatory support with ventricular assist systems has become a treatment alternative for patients with end-stage heart failure owing to the donor shortage. In this report, we have presented our institution's clinical experience in the anesthetic management of ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Methods. Between April 2007 and August 2012, VAD implantation was performed in 84 adult patients with end-stage heart failure. The group included 75 male and 9 female patients of overall mean age, 47.6 +/- 13.4 years. Our retrospective review analyzed elements of perioperative anesthetic care, including preoperative characteristics, general anesthetic care, and blood product usage. Results. The indications for VAD implantation were dilated (n = 59; 70%) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 25; 30%). An intra-aortic balloon pump had been placed in 16 patients. We monitored invasive arterial and central venous pressures as well as intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Etomidate was used as the induction agent in 79 of 84 patients (average dose, 18.75 +/- 1.40 mg). Intraoperative fentanyl dose was 939.69 +/- 212.44 mu g. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (n = 55) or desflurane (n = 29). Dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and levosimendan were used in 74, 79, 60, 14, and 32 patients, respectively. Inhaled nitric oxide was administered to 38 subjects (45%). The amounts of perioperative blood, fresh frozen plasma, and thrombocyte suspension transfusions were 3.96 +/- 2.78, 1.91 +/- 1.21, 1.80 +/- 2.48 u, respectively. On average, patients were extubated 13 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit and discharged therefrom on day 8. Thirty-one patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. While 27 patients (32%) died during the follow-up period, 26 are still living on VAD support. Conclusion. Among patients undergoing VAD implantation, the anesthesiologist should become familiar with the device and consider the severity of cardiac and other end-organ dysfunction.Turkish Transplantat Ctr Coordinat Assoc (TTCCA