4 research outputs found

    Gas-Phase Enthalpies of Formation and Enthalpies of Sublimation of Amino Acids Based on Isodesmic Reaction Calculations

    No full text
    Accurate gas-phase enthalpies of formation (Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>) of 20 common α-amino acids, seven uncommon amino acids, and three small peptides were calculated by combining G4 theory calculations with an isodesmic reaction approach. The internal consistency over a set of Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values was achieved by sequential adjustment of their values through the isodesmic reactions. Four amino acids, alanine, β-alanine, sarcosine, and glycine, with reliable internally self-consistent experimental data, were chosen as the key reference compounds. These amino acids together with about 100 compounds with reliable experimental data (their accuracy was supported by G4 calculations) were used to estimate the enthalpies of formation of remaining amino acids. All of the amino acids with the previously established enthalpies of formation were later used as the reference species in the isodesmic reactions for the other amino acids. A systematic comparison was made of 14 experimentally determined enthalpies of formation with the results of calculations. The experimental enthalpies of formation for 10 amino acids were reproduced with good accuracy, but the experimental and calculated values for 4 compounds differed by 11–21 kJ/mol. For these species, the theoretical Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values were suggested as more reliable than the experimental values. On the basis of theoretical results, the recommended values for the gas-phase enthalpies of formation were also provided for amino acids for which the experimental Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) were not available. The enthalpies of sublimation were evaluated for all compounds by taking into account the literature data on the solid-phase enthalpies of formation and the Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values recommended in our work. A special attention was paid to the accurate prediction of enthalpies of formation of amino acids from the atomization reactions. The problems associated with conformational flexibility of these compounds and harmonic treatment of low frequency torsional modes were discussed. The surprisingly good agreement between the Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values calculated from the atomization and isodesmic reactions is largely the result of a fortuitous mutual compensation of various corrections used in the atomization reaction procedure

    Enthalpies of Formation of Hydrazine and Its Derivatives

    No full text
    Enthalpies of formation, Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>, in both the gas and condensed phase, and enthalpies of sublimation or vaporization have been estimated for hydrazine, NH<sub>2</sub>NH<sub>2</sub>, and its 36 various derivatives using quantum chemical calculations. The composite G4 method has been used along with isodesmic reaction schemes to derive a set of self-consistent high-accuracy gas-phase enthalpies of formation. To estimate the enthalpies of sublimation and vaporization with reasonable accuracy (5–20 kJ/mol), the method of molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) has been used. The value of Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(NH<sub>2</sub>NH<sub>2</sub>,g) = 97.0 ± 3.0 kJ/mol was determined from 75 isogyric reactions involving about 50 reference species; for most of these species, the accurate Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values are available in Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT). The calculated value is in excellent agreement with the reported results of the most accurate models based on coupled cluster theory (97.3 kJ/mol, the average of six calculations). Thus, the difference between the values predicted by high-level theoretical calculations and the experimental value of Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(NH<sub>2</sub>NH<sub>2</sub>,g) = 95.55 ± 0.19 kJ/mol recommended in the ATcT and other comprehensive reference sources is sufficiently large and requires further investigation. Different hydrazine derivatives have been also considered in this work. For some of them, both the enthalpy of formation in the condensed phase and the enthalpy of sublimation or vaporization are available; for other compounds, experimental data for only one of these properties exist. Evidence of accuracy of experimental data for the first group of compounds was provided by the agreement with theoretical Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) value. The unknown property for the second group of compounds was predicted using the MEP model. This paper presents a systematic comparison of experimentally determined enthalpies of formation and enthalpies of sublimation or vaporization with the results of calculations. Because of relatively large uncertainty in the estimated enthalpies of sublimation, it was not always possible to evaluate the accuracy of the experimental values; however, this model allowed us to detect large errors in the experimental data, as in the case of 5,5′-hydrazinebistetrazole. The enthalpies of formation and enthalpies of sublimation or vaporization have been predicted for the first time for ten hydrazine derivatives with no experimental data. A recommended set of self-consistent experimental and calculated gas-phase enthalpies of formation of hydrazine derivatives can be used as reference Δ<sub>f</sub><i>H</i><sub>298</sub><sup>°</sup>(g) values to predict the enthalpies of formation of various hydrazines by means of isodesmic reactions
    corecore