Supporting the uptake of low cost resilience: Final report (FD2682)

Executive SummaryThe Defra research project FD2682 examined the technical, social and behavioural aspects of supporting low cost flood repairable measures designed to limit damage to buildings during and after flood events. Flood repairable measures (sometimes called ‘flood resilient measures’) applied to buildings are designed to limit damage, or speed up recovery where water has entered a property. They include strategies to keep water away from building elements (such as raising power sockets) and the internal use of waterproof or water resistant materials, including those capable of retaining their integrity and recovering quickly after inundation. These measures have traditionally been regarded as most useful when water exclusion approaches(measures to keep water out of the building, sometimes called ‘resistant measures’)are not practical or cost effective.The investigation took an action research approach, consulting widely and reflecting on findings on an ongoing basis. The research comprised the following stages:1. A rapid evidence assessment (REA) including a review of relevant academic and grey literature; consultation with a panel of experts; interviews with flood reinstatement and property protection professionals; and interviews with occupants of properties where flood repairable measures have been adopted.2. An assessment of the costs and benefits of selected low cost flood repairable measures, and illustrative packages of measures.3. A demonstration project to explore innovative approaches that could be used by local agencies and businesses to address some of the barriers to the use of flood repairable measures. This made use of a co-design process, via the formation of the Tewkesbury ‘Learning and Action Alliance’ (LAA).The REA concluded that (in contrast to previous perceptions of repairable measures as a last resort for properties at highest risk) low cost repairable measures are widely applicable as part of an integrated approach to limiting the residual risk to individual properties that may also include water exclusion measures. Interviews as part of theREA showed repairability to be a pragmatic approach that can be applied incrementally at various windows of opportunity with lower financial barriers to implementation than alternative strategies. The assessment of costs and benefits of selected low cost flood repairable measures, and illustrative packages of measures, confirmed their potential cost effectiveness in limiting flood damage.The REA concluded that the weight of evidence supports the effectiveness of an ever expanding list of low cost resilience measures in limiting flood damage.However, there are also major gaps in evidence, and in communication and sharing of available evidence, reducing the confidence in implementation of measures within relevant trades and professionals, as well as by owners and occupiers directly. Key areas in urgent need of additional scientific evidence include: the implications ofdebris and contaminants in floodwater; the effect of hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressure on ‘waterproof’ materials; and durability of resilient measures afterprolonged flood exposure. However, attention should also be directed towards further understanding the real performance of flood repairable measures in a variety of types of building before, during and after flooding.The REA and demonstration project both concluded that, in order for the potential benefits of repairable measures to be realised in practice, there will need to be a shiftin the repair and reinstatement process. Improved protocols (and incentives) are required that include clarity regarding the autonomy and responsibility of differentactors within the repair process to recommend adoption of repairable measures. The inception of Flood Re offers both a challenge and an opportunity in this regard. The research finds that there could be benefits to placing the specification of negligible cost and cost neutral measures within the professional remit of surveyors and contractors on the ground. To support this, improved technical guidance and training is needed to raise levels of understanding and awareness within the industry. The surveyors’ checklist, designed within the project, was seen as a useful contribution to this requirement. Improved confidence in appropriate measures could also be fostered through provision of exemplars and factsheets.The REA and demonstration project highlighted the potential importance of other windows of opportunity (outside the recovery period) in the take up of low cost floodrepairable measures. Insurance renewal and property transfer represent opportunities to raise awareness of measures at very low cost with minimal upskillingof professionals and may provide direct triggers to action. Other building work and redecoration opportunities are harder to target in terms of awareness raising,therefore a well-informed and up-skilled local ‘property support network’ (PSN) is needed, in order to spot opportunities to support uptake on an individual basis.Evaluation of the demonstration project innovations indicated that implementation was most successful in those innovations driven by members of the LAA, or hadsignificant input from members of the local PSN. Increased awareness of low cost flood resilience measures amongst LAA members was also achieved. Therefore the LAA model was seen as a potential platform to engage relevant local propertyexperts and agencies, and to empower them to encourage property level approaches.However, the REA evidence and that from the LAA meetings together with the evaluation of the surveyor’s checklist suggest that emotional barriers to implementation of low cost resilience are important. Use of repairable measures is a difficult concept, as it requires an acceptance that water might enter the property (home or business) and changes within the living space that might feel abnormal.Interviews with practitioner experts, together with an assessment of current regulations, suggest that making small adjustments to building regulations, relevantto passive avoidance and resilience, could aid normalisation of such measures. A greater focus on design and aesthetics aspects, and clearer guidance on the ways todeal with perceived contamination is also seen as important by professionals, the PSN and in the demonstration project. Finally, a wider framing of property level flooddamage reduction, with suggested schemes including both water entry and water exclusion measures was indicated by the interviews with homeowners and professionals and discussed by the LAA as helpful in addressing emotional barriers

Move it AUS Better Ageing Grant; A national evaluation report

An evaluation of the nationally-funded Move It AUS Better Ageing Grant Program, funding organisations to design programs to reduce inactivity across target populations of older adults in Australia. The purpose of the independent national evaluation was to critically appraise the Program to better understand how organisations can utilise sport and targeted physical activity projects to tackle physical inactivity in older adults across Australia. This evaluation incorporated findings from participant surveys and will inform the sport sector on what works and what doesn't when engaging inactive older adults in sport and physical activity

Holocene alluvial fan evolution, Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating and paraglacial debris floods in the SE Jostedalsbreen region, southern Norway

The evolution of several sub‐alpine alluvial fans SE of the Jostedalsbreen ice cap was investigated based on their geomorphology and Schmidt‐hammer exposure‐age dating (SHD ) applied to 47 boulder deposits on the fan surfaces. A debris‐flood rather than debrisflow or water‐flow origin for the deposits was inferred from their morphology, consisting of low ridges with terminal splays up to 100 m wide without lateral levees. This was supported by fan, catchment, and boulder characteristics. SHD ages ranged from 9480±765 to 1955±810 years. The greatest number of boulder deposits, peak debris‐flood activity and maximum fan aggradation occurred between ̃9.0 and 8.0 ka, following regional deglaciation at ̃9.7 ka. The high debris concentrations necessary for debris floods were attributed to paraglacial processes enhanced by unstable till deposits on steep slopes within the catchments. From ̃8.0 ka, fan aggradation became progressively less as the catchment sediment sources tended towards exhaustion, precipitation decreased during the Holocene Thermal Maximum, and tree cover increased. After ̃4.0 ka, some areas of fan surfaces stabilized, while Late‐Holocene climatic deterioration led to renewed fan aggradation in response to the neoglacial growth of glaciers, culminating in the Little Ice Age. These changes are generalized within a conceptual model of alluvial fan evolution in this recently‐deglaciated mountain region and in glacierized catchments. This study highlights the potential importance of debris floods, of which relatively little is known, especially in the context of alluvial fan evolution

Active Kids Evaluation Report (2018-2020)

This report presents evaluation findings from the independent evaluation of the New South Wales (NSW) Government’s Active Kids program. Data are presented from the first 3 years of the Active Kids program delivery (2018, 2019, and 2020). Active Kids, the first universal voucher program of its kind, is an innovative approach to promoting participation in organised sport and physical activity outside-of-school among all school-enrolled children in NSW, Australia. Evaluation of the program was designed to help us understand the extent to which a universal voucher program can reach and engage children in organised sport and physical activity. The evaluation affords a unique opportunity to learn more about influencing the physical activity participation behaviours of children in NSW, the factors that affect participation and to understand health and well-being outcomes associated with participation. These population-level program evaluation data have not previously been collected throughout the sport sector. This evaluation also makes an important contribution to the evidence base on how, to effectively design, implement and evaluate complex, at-scale programs, underpinned by evidence, and reported in a way that is readily accessible and appropriate for policy makers and practitioners. The SPRINTER1 Group is a specialist academic research group within the Charles Perkins Centre and the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney. In 2016, the Prevention Research Collaboration established a policy-focused partnership with the NSW Government Office of Sport, entitled SPRINTER. SPRINTER led the pragmatic evaluation design of the Active Kids program in close collaboration with the Office of Sport. Through this collaboration, SPRINTER influenced routine data capture within the registration process for the Active Kids program led by the NSW Government - Service NSW and Office of Sport. The evaluation of Active Kids is registered with the Australian and New Zealand clinical trials registry: ACTRN12618001148268. The evaluation protocol was designed using the TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) Checklist. A complete outline of the evaluation protocol can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp301220062. This evaluation received ethics approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sydney (Project number: 2017/947)

Engaging Physically Inactive Communities: Key Insights from Move It AUS Grant Programs

An evaluation of the nationally-funded Move It AUS Participation Grant Program, funding organisations to design programs to reduce inactivity across target populations in Australia. The purpose of the independent national evaluation was to critically appraise the Program to better understand how organisations can utilise sport and targeted physical activity projects to tackle physical inactivity across Australia. This evaluation incorporated findings from participant surveys in both streams, as well as qualitative interview data from interviews with funded organisations. These findings will inform the sport sector on what works and what doesn't when engaging inactive target groups to increase population physical activity levels

Researching generalism

No abstract available

The health and well-being effects of drought: Assessing multi-stakeholder perspectives through narratives from the UK

The global literature on drought and health highlights a variety of health effects for people in developing countries where certain prevailing social, economic and environmental conditions increase their vulnerability especially with climate change. Despite increased focus on climate change, relatively less is known about the health-drought impacts in the developed country context. In the UK, where climate change–related risk of water shortages has been identified as a key area for action, there is need for better understanding of drought-health linkages. This paper assesses people’s narratives of drought on health and well-being in the UK using a source-receptor-impact framing. Stakeholder narratives indicate that drought can present perceived health and well-being effects through reduced water quantity, water quality, compromised hygiene and sanitation, food security, and air quality. Heatwave associated with drought was also identified as a source of health effects through heat and wildfire, and drought-related vectors. Drought was viewed as potentially attributing both negative and positive effects for physical and mental health, with emphasis on mental health. Health impacts were often complex and cross-sectoral in nature indicating the need for a management approach across several sectors that targets drought and health in risk assessment and adaptation planning processes. Two recurring themes in the UK narratives were the health consequences of drought for ‘at-risk’ groups and the need to target them, and that drought in a changing climate presented potential health implications for at-risk groups