Indicators of national program capability in 2013–2014.

<p>Percentage of country respondents (n = 19) in 2013–2014 with national rabies control programs and basic indicators for control programs.</p

Development of capacities against emerging and endemic zoonoses per country.

<p>Seven capacities were assessed for each country. Countries are grouped by sub-region (South America, Central and North America, and the Caribbean). The first bar shows the average capacity development for all countries that responded to the survey (31). Regional averages are also shown for each region to allow comparisons between countries.</p

Convergence : mensuel de la solidarité / Secours populaire français ; dir. publ. Julien Lauprêtre ; réd. Antonio Garcia, Valmont Ponceau

avril 20052005/04 (N247)-2005/04.Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : UnivJeun

Solar panels at an outpost in Haiti.

<p>Electricity is fed to refrigerators inside the post to ensure cold chain for canine rabies vaccine.</p

Comparison between the Ministries regarding their top endemic zoonotic disease priorities.

<p>Comparison between the Ministries regarding their top endemic zoonotic disease priorities.</p

List of endemic zoonotic diseases and their frequency in regards to their prioritization by the Ministries of Health and Agriculture and combined entities in Latin America and Caribbean countries.

<p>First, second, and third refer to the priority level of the zoonotic diseases and total is a sum of all the times that disease was prioritized in such categories.</p

Comparison of the top five priority emerging zoonoses of Latin American and Caribbean countries.

<p>Comparison of the top five priority emerging zoonoses of Latin American and Caribbean countries.</p

Top capacities that require improvement for each of the top five emerging priority zoonoses.

<p>The Ministries of Health and Agriculture and combined entities of Latin American and Caribbean countries listed capacities to improve primarily within five categories (control, <i>cont</i>; coordination, <i>coor</i>; diagnosis, <i>diag</i>; education, <i>edu</i>; and surveillance, <i>surv</i>). Responses that fell outside these categories were categorized as <i>other</i>. Percentage represents total respondents received per zoonosis.</p

Rabies laboratory capacities.

<p>Percent of countries that replied positively to the use of various laboratory techniques for rabies diagnosis. Seventeen of 19 countries responded; the two non-responders included one low income and one upper middle income country.</p

Animal exposures and post-exposure-prophylaxis (PEP).

<p>(A) Number of animal exposures and number of human rabies vaccines applied by year, period 1998–2014; (B) Ratio PEP doses to number of exposures; (C) Incidence of exposures per 100,000 population.</p