10 research outputs found

    Antiviral protection and the importance of Wolbachia density and: tissue tropism in Drosophila simulans

    Get PDF
    Wolbachia, a maternally transmitted endosymbiont of insects, is increasingly being seen as an effective biological control agent that can interfere with transmission of pathogens, including dengue virus. However, the mechanism of antiviral protection is not well understood. The density and distribution of Wolbachia in host tissues have been implicated as contributing factors by previous studies with both mosquitoes and flies. Drosophila flies infected with five diverse strains of Wolbachia were screened for the ability to mediate antiviral protection. The three protective Wolbachia strains were more closely related and occurred at a higher density within whole flies than the two nonprotective Wolbachia strains. In this study, to further investigate the relationship between whole-fly Wolbachia density and the ability to mediate antiviral protection, tetracycline was used to decrease the abundance of the high-density, protective Wolbachia strain wAu prior to viral challenge. Antiviral protection was lost when the density of the protective Wolbachia strain was decreased to an abundance similar to that of nonprotective Wolbachia strains. We determined the Wolbachia density and distribution in tissues of the same five fly-Wolbachia combinations as used previously. The Wolbachia density within the head, gut, and Malpighian tubules correlated with the ability to mediate antiviral protection. These findings may facilitate the development of Wolbachia biological control strategies and help to predict host-Wolbachia pairings that may interfere with virus-induced pathology

    The effect of different <i>Wolbachia</i> strains on the accumulation of FHV in <i>D. simulans.</i>

    No full text
    <p>Graphs show survival of flies infected by <i>w</i>Au (<b>A</b>), <i>w</i>Ri (<b>B</b>), <i>w</i>Ha (<b>C</b>), and <i>w</i>No (<b>D</b>) challenged with FHV (black line) or mock infected (grey line). <i>Wolbachia</i> infected (circle and plus sign) and uninfected (triangle and cross) flies. Error bars represent SEM calculated from three replicates. The survival of FHV infected flies with and without <i>Wolbachia</i> is significantly different for <i>w</i>Au and <i>w</i>Ri (p<0.0001, log rank test on Kaplan-Meier curves). For each fly line a similar result was recorded in a replicate experiment.</p

    <i>Wolbachia</i> strain <i>w</i>Mel provides antiviral protection in <i>D. simulans</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Graph shows survival of flies infected with DCV (black line) or mock infected (grey line). <i>w</i>Mel-infected (circle and plus sign) or uninfected (triangle and cross) flies. The survival of DCV infected flies with and without <i>Wolbachia</i> is significantly different (p<0.0001). Error bars represent SEM calculated from three replicate vials. This is a representative experiment which was repeated twice more with similar results. (<b>B</b>) Graph showing accumulation of infectious DCV in <i>w</i>Mel infected (grey bars) or uninfected (white bar) flies. Bars represent means from two replicates with SEM shown, and * indicates a significant difference between the means of day 2 samples (p<0.05, unpaired t test).</p

    Relative-density of <i>Wolbachia</i> strains in <i>D. simulans</i>.

    No full text
    <p>For each fly line the graph shows the relative abundance of <i>Wolbachia</i> to host genomic DNA estimated using quantitative PCR. Bars represent the mean of 10 replicates and error bars are SEM.</p

    The effect of different <i>Wolbachia</i> strains on the accumulation of DCV in <i>D. simulans</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Graphs show accumulation of infectious DCV in flies with (grey bar) or without (white bar) <i>w</i>Au (<b>A</b>), <i>w</i>Ri (<b>B</b>), <i>w</i>Ha (<b>C</b>), and <i>w</i>No (<b>D</b>). Bars represent means from two replicates with SEM shown, and * indicates a significant difference between the means of day 2 samples (p<0.05, unpaired t test).</p

    Antiviral protection of different <i>Wolbachia</i> strains in <i>D. simulans</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Graphs show survival of flies infected by <i>w</i>Au (<b>A</b>), <i>w</i>Ri (<b>B</b>), <i>w</i>Ha (<b>C</b>), and <i>w</i>No (<b>D</b>) challenged with DCV (black line) or mock infected (grey line). Flies with <i>Wolbachia</i> (circle and plus sign) and without <i>Wolbachia</i> (triangle and cross). Error bars represent SEM calculated from three replicates. The survival of DCV infected flies with and without <i>Wolbachia</i> is significantly different for <i>w</i>Au (p<0.0001), <i>w</i>Ri (p<0.0001), and <i>w</i>Ha (p<0.01), using log rank test on Kaplan-Meier curves. Experiments were replicated on at least two additional independent cohorts of flies, and the results for all respective replicates of experiments shown in panel A, B and D were similar, however the replicates for panel C varied (see <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000656#s2" target="_blank">Results</a>).</p

    Variation in Antiviral Protection Mediated by Different Wolbachia Strains in Drosophila simulans

    Get PDF
    Drosophila C virus (DCV) is a natural pathogen of Drosophila and a useful model for studying antiviral defences. The Drosophila host is also commonly infected with the widespread endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia pipientis. When DCV coinfects Wolbachia-infected D. melanogaster, virus particles accumulate more slowly and virus induced mortality is substantially delayed. Considering that Wolbachia is estimated to infect up to two-thirds of all insect species, the observed protective effects of Wolbachia may extend to a range of both beneficial and pest insects, including insects that vector important viral diseases of humans, animals and plants. Currently, Wolbachia-mediated antiviral protection has only been described from a limited number of very closely related strains that infect D. melanogaster. We used D. simulans and its naturally occurring Wolbachia infections to test the generality of the Wolbachia-mediated antiviral protection. We generated paired D. simulans lines either uninfected or infected with five different Wolbachia strains. Each paired fly line was challenged with DCV and Flock House virus. Significant antiviral protection was seen for some but not all of the Wolbachia strain-fly line combinations tested. In some cases, protection from virus-induced mortality was associated with a delay in virus accumulation, but some Wolbachia-infected flies were tolerant to high titres of DCV. The Wolbachia strains that did protect occurred at comparatively high density within the flies and were most closely related to the D. melanogaster Wolbachia strain wMel. These results indicate that Wolbachia-mediated antiviral protection is not ubiquitous, a finding that is important for understanding the distribution of Wolbachia and virus in natural insect populations
    corecore