Article 50 does allow Britain to negotiate a transitional period

The PM intends to negotiate a transitional period after March 2019, during which people, businesses and services would have time to adapt to Brexit while the current regulatory framework is maintained. But it is still unclear how Britain will do this. Federico Ortino and Holger Hestermeyer (King’s College London) argue that Article 50 allows the UK to postpone the beginning of the withdrawal agreement until a later date – perhaps March 2021. This would give the government valuable time to implement Brexit

达成国际投资共识的必要性

多边投资框架的讨论最近出现了复苏，国际商会，世界经济论坛和各种作家呼吁对这个问题进行谈判。越来越多的国家已审查和调整其国际投资政策。这反映了与当前国际投资法律制度的不满，并渴望改善。 围绕制度（包括超过3000国际投资协定）的关键问题，影响，例如，确定该制度的总体目的，界定外国的“投资”和“投资者的概念，”开放式投资保护标准内容，加强投资者与国家争端解决系统的合法性，解决缺乏一个强有力和协调的体制结构。条约和仲裁实践的发展以及可能解决的一些问题导致政权的改善。 目前尚不清楚，但是，如何迅速，到什么程度，这些挑战将在日常事件处理。允许政权走向成熟，非常耗时。此外，有广泛的利益相关者之间的意见分歧在何种程度上改变是必要的，应该是什么，以及他们如何应带来。这是一个复杂的情况，呼吁更好地了解各有关方面之间的问题和桥梁建设

The Need for an International Investment Consensus-Building Process

Discussions on a multilateral investment framework have recently seen a revival, as the International Chamber of Commerce, the World Economic Forum and various authors have called for negotiations on this subject. A growing number of countries have been reviewing and adapting their international investment policies. This reflects dissatisfaction with the current international investment law regime, and a desire to improve it. Critical issues affecting the regime (consisting of over 3,000 international investment agreements) revolve around, for example, identifying the overall purpose of the regime, defining the notion of foreign "investment" and "investor," giving content to open-ended investment protection standards, strengthening the legitimacy of the investor-State dispute-settlement system, and addressing the lack of a strong and coordinated institutional structure. Developments in treaty and arbitral practice may well address some of these issues and lead to the improvement of the regime. It is not clear, however, how rapidly and to what extent these challenges will be addressed in the normal course of events. Allowing the regime to mature is time consuming. Moreover, there are widely diverging views among stakeholders about the extent to which changes are needed, what they should be and how they should be brought about. This is a complex situation that calls for a better understanding of the issues and bridge-building between various interested parties

The Need for an International Investment Consensus-Building Process

Discussions on a multilateral investment framework have recently seen a revival, as the International Chamber of Commerce, the World Economic Forum and various authors have called for negotiations on this subject. A growing number of countries have been reviewing and adapting their international investment policies. This reflects dissatisfaction with the current international investment law regime, and a desire to improve it. Critical issues affecting the regime (consisting of over 3,000 international investment agreements) revolve around, for example, identifying the overall purpose of the regime, defining the notion of foreign "investment" and "investor," giving content to open-ended investment protection standards, strengthening the legitimacy of the investor-State dispute-settlement system, and addressing the lack of a strong and coordinated institutional structure. Developments in treaty and arbitral practice may well address some of these issues and lead to the improvement of the regime. It is not clear, however, how rapidly and to what extent these challenges will be addressed in the normal course of events. Allowing the regime to mature is time consuming. Moreover, there are widely diverging views among stakeholders about the extent to which changes are needed, what they should be and how they should be brought about. This is a complex situation that calls for a better understanding of the issues and bridge-building between various interested parties