sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199231168669 - Supplemental material for The safety profile of single antiplatelet therapy with flow diverters: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199231168669 for The safety profile of single antiplatelet therapy with flow diverters: Systematic review and meta-analysis by Yigit Can Senol, Atakan Orscelik, Sherief Ghozy, Kobeissi Hassan, Santhosh Arul, Cem Bilgin, Ramanathan Kadirvel and David F Kallmes in Interventional Neuroradiology</p

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with extreme large infarction core

BackgroundRecent clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and large infarction core may still benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In this study, we evaluate outcomes of MT in LVO patients presenting with extremely large infarction core Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS 0–2).MethodsData from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was interrogated. We identified thrombectomy patients presenting with an occlusion in the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and extremely large infarction core (ASPECTS 0–2). A favorable outcome was defined by achieving a modified Rankin scale of 0–3 at 90 days post-MT. Successful recanalization was defined by achieving a modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥2B.ResultsWe identified 58 patients who presented with ASPECTS 0–2 and underwent MT . Median age was 70.0 (59.0–78.0) years, 45.1% were females, and 202 (36.3%) patients received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. There was no difference regarding the location of the occlusion (p=0.57). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 268 (54.6%) patients and stent retriever was used in 70 (14.3%) patients. In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0-2 the mortality rate was 4.5%, 27.9% had mRS 0-3 at day 90, 66.67% ≥70 years of age had mRS of 5-6 at day 90. On multivariable analysis, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, and successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2B) were independently associated with favorable outcomes.ConclusionsThis multicentered, retrospective cohort study suggests that MT may be beneficial in a select group of patients with ASPECTS 0–2

Abstract TP197: Impact of First-Pass Effect on Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Low Aspects

Abstract only Introduction: The first-pass effect (FPE), defined as a complete or near-complete recanalization after a single pass of a mechanical thrombectomy (MT) device, has been linked to favorable clinical outcomes. However, its effectiveness in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with low ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 2-5) has not been validated. Method: We utilized data from STAR, a multicenter database of 84 centers worldwide, to conduct a retrospective, cohort study on patients who underwent MT for internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 occlusion presenting with ASPECTS 2-5. We compared the outcomes of patients who achieved FPE (successful recanalization with an mTICI score of 2c or higher in one pass) to those who did not. The primary outcome was a 90-day favorable outcome, defined as mRS 0-3. Secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Out of 10,229 patients in the STAR database, 250 patients met our inclusion criteria. Among those, 60 (24%) achieved FPE. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline, imaging, and procedural characteristics. FPE was significantly associated with higher odds of 90-day mRS 0-3 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04 - 4.20; P-value: 0.04) and lower rates of ICH (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25 - 0.93, P-value: 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in sICH rates (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.31 - 2.04, P-value: 0.70). Conclusion: Achieving FPE in AIS stroke patients with low ASPECTS was associated with significantly higher rates of good functional outcomes and lower rates of ICH

Abstract WP184: Intravenous Thrombolysis Improves Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract only Introduction: The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are not well established. Methods: This study included patients from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusions with unsuccessful MT (mTICI score ≤ 2a). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using age, sex, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, mTICI score, and symptom onset to groin puncture time. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2). Results: Of 610 patients with unsuccessful MT, 219 were matched in each group. Median ages were 70 [IQR: 61 - 80] and 73 [IQR: 62 - 81] in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group. Final TICI scores of 0, 1, and 2a were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, compared to 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group showed a significantly. higher 90-day mRS of 0-2 (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.53-4.32) and mRS of 0-3 (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.12). There were no significant differences between the groups in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, or 90-day mortality rates. Conclusions: IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with unsuccessful MT. Ensuring that IVT is provided to all eligible stroke patients should remain a priority

Comparison of balloon guide catheter versus non-balloon guide catheter for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with distal medium vessel occlusion

BackgroundSeveral studies have established the safety and efficacy of balloon guide catheters (BGCs) for large vessel occlusions. However, the utility of BGCs remains largely unexplored for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs). In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes of BGC vs. Non-BGC in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for DMVO.MethodThis retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) encompassed adult patients with acute anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, and middle cerebral artery-M2–3–4 occlusions. Procedure times, safety, recanalization, and neurological outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis based on first-line thrombectomy techniques.ResultsA total of 1508 patients were included, with 231 patients (15.3%) in the BGC group and 1277 patients (84.7%) in the non-BGC group. The BGC group had a lower modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2C (43.2% vs 52.7%, P=0.01), longer time from puncture to intracranial access (15 vs 8 min, P<0.01), and from puncture to final recanalization (97 vs 34 min, P<0.01). In the Solumbra subgroup, the first pass effect (FPE) rate was lower in the BGC group (17.4% vs 30.7%, P=0.03). Regarding clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (8.8% vs 14.9%, P=0.03).ConclusionOur study found that use of BGC in patients with DMVO was associated with lower mTICI scores, decreased FPE rates, reduced distal embolization, and longer procedure times

Abstract TMP88: Impact of Tandem Vertebrobasilar Occlusion on Outcome of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion

Abstract only Introduction: The efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for tandem vertebrobasilar occlusion (tVBO) is not well established in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Objective: To investigate the treatment outcomes of MT in tVBO. Method: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort included patients with MT for tVBO and isolated BAO from 2013 to 2023. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2. Secondary outcomes included complete recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] ≥ 2C) and 90-day mortality rate. These outcomes were compared between tVBO and isolated BAO groups. Adjustment factors were age, sex, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), pre-morbid mRS, onset to groin duration, and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Results: Among 10,229 patients, 689 had BAO. Of those, 61 (9.7%) had a tVBO. Median age was 61 [IQR 53-74] years and 29 (47.5%) patients were female. Compared to isolated BAO, tVBO group had lower age (61 [53-74] versus 68 [58-79], P<0.001) and lower admission NIHSS (15 [7 - 22] versus 17 [9-26], P≤0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of complete recanalization between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.39-1.79; P=0.60) However, the tVBO group had significantly lower odds of a favorable outcome compared to the isolated BAO group (aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.83; P=0.023) and higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.59-7.85; P=0.002). Binary regression analysis revealed that age (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.00; P=0.019), admission NIHSS (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.93; P<0.001), premorbid mRS (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.93; P=0.016), successful recanalization (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.71-5.15; P<0.001), and tVBO (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.11-0.86; P=0.031) were significant predictors of 90-day favorable outcome. Conclusion: tVBO was associated with poor outcomes. Further efforts should be aimed at improving outcomes for this subpopulation

Abstract WP215: Number of Passes Matter in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Who Underwent Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract only Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients often require multiple passes during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to open the vessel. Yet, at times, even numerous passes are unsuccessful. This study aims to investigate the impact of the number of passes on the outcomes of patients who underwent failed MT. Methods: We used Data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from 2013 to August 2023. Patients who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 with unsuccessful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≤ 2a) were included. Primary outcome was 90- day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Outcomes were compared among patients who received ≤ 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 MT passes. Results: 736 patients met inclusion criteria. 90-day mRS 0-2 was found to decrease with number of passes (Figure 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 3 passes (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23 -0.96, P-value: 0.04), 4 passes (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.19 -1.03, P-value: 0.07), and ≥ 5 passes (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08 -0.50, P-value: <0.001) were associated with lower odds of mRS 0-2 compared to ≤ 2 passes. However, there were no significant differences between groups in ICH, sICH, or 90-day mortality. Conclusion: The number of passes affects functional outcomes among stroke patients who underwent failed MT

Comparative Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with ASPECTS 2-3 vs. 4-5

The influence of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with low ASPECTS remains unknown. In this study, we compared the outcomes of AIS patients treated with MT for large vessel occlusion (LVO) categorized by ASPECTS value. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 305 patients with AIS caused by LVO, defined as the occlusion of the internal carotid artery and/or the M1 segments of the middle cerebral artery, stratified into two groups: ASPECTS 2-3 and 4-5. The primary outcome was favorable outcome defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-2, 90-day mortality, any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH). We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the impact of ASPECTS 2-3 vs. 4-5 on outcomes. Fifty-nine patients (19.3%) had ASPECTS 2-3 and 246 (80.7%) had ASPECTS 4-5. Favorable outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]= 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-2.41, p=0.80). There were also no significant differences in 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR= 1.65, 95% CI: 0.66-3.99, p=0.30), 90-day mortality (aOR= 1.14, 95% CI: 0.58-2.20, p=0.70), any ICH (aOR= 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28-1.00, p=0.06), and sICH (aOR= 0.70, 95% CI: 0.27-1.63, p = 0.40) between the groups. AIS patients with LVO undergoing MT with ASPECTS 2-3 had similar outcomes compared to ASPECTS 4-5

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Abstract only Introduction: The combination of intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been thoroughly investigated. However, no study has explored the outcomes of combining both intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with MT. Methods: Data from Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from 2013 to 2023 was utilized. We compared AIS patients with LVO who underwent MT with combined intra-venous and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IV+IA) and with intra-venous thrombolysis alone (IV). We performed propensity score (PS) matching between the two groups using age, sex, premorbid mRS, admission NIHSS, occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, time from symptoms onset to arterial puncture, and frontline technique. Primary outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2C), early neurological improvement (defined as 4 or more points improvement in NIHSS score in 24 hours), 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, mRS 0-1, and mortality. Results: A total of 2495 LVO-related AIS patients were included, consisting of the IA+IV group (n = 266) and the IV group (n = 2228). Propensity matching yielded 192 well-matched patients in each group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in either ICH or sICH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.52, p = 0.60; OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.42-2.03, p > 0.90, respectively). The IA+IV group had a significantly lower proportion of successful recanalization (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.62, p < 0.001), and early neurological improvement (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30-1.00). However, 90-day mRS 0-2, mRS 0-1, and mortality rates showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the combined use of IA and IV thrombolysis in AIS patients undergoing MT is safe. Although the IA+IV group demonstrated lower rates of recanalization and early neurological improvement, long-term functional outcomes and mortality rates were comparable to the IV-thrombolysis group, indicating a potential delayed benefit of additional IA thrombolysis therapy

Abstract WP180: Novel Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Futile Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion

Abstract only Introduction: Up to 50% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who undergo successful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fail to achieve favorable outcomes (futile recanalization). In this study we aim to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict futile recanalization (FR) in AIS patients who undergo MT. Methods: We used data from an ongoing large, multicenter database from 2013 to 2023. We included AIS patients treated with MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion with successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score ≥ 2C) and procedure durations under 60 minutes. FR was defined as successful recanalization with 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6. The dataset was divided into 75% for training and 25% for external validation. Using the Caret Package in R, multiple models were tested, and their performances were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating. Both baseline and pre-interventional characteristics were incorporated into the model. The selected model was then externally validated on a 25% validation dataset. Results: Among 2,546 qualified patients, FR occurred in 1,342 (52.7%). In univariate analysis, baseline characteristics were significantly different between FR and non-FR groups. The M5P model demonstrated the highest performance (AUC: 0.833; 95% CI: 0.7989-0.852; PPV: 0.8101) in comparison to other tested models such as logistic regression (AUC: 0.74), RF (AUC: 0.78), J48 (AUC: 0.78), SVM (AUC: 0.79), and GB (AUC: 0.79). The external validation of the model showed satisfactory results (AUC: 75.25; 95% CI: 70-80; PPV: 76.87). Conclusion: Utilizing clinical, pre-procedural, and imaging parameters, the M5P model can efficiently predict F) in AIS patients before attempting MT. This tool can assist neurointerventionalists in adequately choosing their MT candidates