Percentage of time of dyadic synchronization according to the opposition level.

<p>a) Longitudinal and b) lateral displacements for the whole analysed half and by different movement speed categories. *: Significant differences at p<0.05.</p

K-means clustering of players' according to the percentage of time of dyadic synchronization.

<p>a) Longitudinal and b) lateral displacements of defenders (D), midfielders (M) and forwards (F). Solid lines represent the higher synchronization group; dashed lines represent the intermediate synchronization group; dotted lines represent the low synchronization group.</p

Standardized effect sizes and 95% CI of pairwise differences between opposition levels for time motion (a) and intra-team synchronization (b) variables.

<p>Positive values represent superior results in matches opposing the higher-level team.</p

A rotation matrix was applied rotating the data through an angle <i>θ</i>.

<p>A rotation matrix was calculated from the field vertices and applied to the players' positions, rotating the data through an angle <i>θ</i> in order that the longitudinal displacements were aligned with the x-axis and the lateral displacements were aligned with the y-axis.</p

Clustering groups' percentage of time of dyadic synchronization according to the opposition level.

<p>a) Longitudinal and b) lateral displacements. Solid lines represent the higher synchronization group; dashed lines represent the intermediate synchronization group; dotted lines represent the low synchronization group. *: Significant differences at p<0.05.</p

Additional file 1 of Machine learning applied to fMRI patterns of brain activation in response to mutilation pictures predicts PTSD symptoms

Supplementary Material 1: Portugal_202