Relative Tendency of Carbonyl Compounds To Form Enamines

Equilibria between carbonyl compounds and their enamines (from <i>O</i>-TBDPS-derived prolinol) have been examined by NMR spectroscopy in DMSO-<i>d</i>₆. By comparing the exchange reactions between pairs (enamine A + carbonyl B → carbonyl A + enamine B), a quite general scale of the tendency of carbonyl groups to form enamines has been established. Aldehydes quickly give enamines that are relatively more stable than those of ketones, but there are exceptions to this expected rule; for example, 1,3-dihydroxyacetone acetals or 3,5-dioxacyclohexanones (2-phenyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one) show a greater tendency to afford enamines than many α-substituted aldehydes

Nucleophile-Catalyzed Additions to Activated Triple Bonds. Protection of Lactams, Imides, and Nucleosides with MocVinyl and Related Groups

Additions of lactams, imides, (<i>S</i>)-4-benzyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one, 2-pyridone, pyrimidine-2,4-diones (AZT derivatives), or inosines to the electron-deficient triple bonds of methyl propynoate, <i>tert</i>-butyl propynoate, 3-butyn-2-one, <i>N</i>-propynoylmorpholine, or <i>N</i>-methoxy-<i>N</i>-methylpropynamide in the presence of many potential catalysts were examined. DABCO and, second, DMAP appeared to be the best (highest reaction rates and <i>E/Z</i> ratios), while RuCl₃, RuClCp*­(PPh₃)₂, AuCl, AuCl­(PPh₃), CuI, and Cu₂(OTf)₂ were incapable of catalyzing such additions. The groups incorporated (for example, the 2-(methoxycarbonyl)­ethenyl group that we name MocVinyl) serve as protecting groups for the above-mentioned heterocyclic CONH or CONHCO moieties. Deprotections were accomplished via exchange with good nucleophiles: the 1-dodecanethiolate anion turned out to be the most general and efficient reagent, but in some particular cases other nucleophiles also worked (e.g., MocVinyl-inosines can be cleaved with succinimide anion). Some structural and mechanistic details have been accounted for with the help of DFT and MP2 calculations

Cyclostreptin Derivatives Specifically Target Cellular Tubulin and Further Map the Paclitaxel Site

Cyclostreptin is the first microtubule-stabilizing agent whose mechanism of action was discovered to involve formation of a covalent bond with tubulin. Treatment of cells with cyclostreptin irreversibly stabilizes their microtubules because cyclostreptin forms a covalent bond to β-tubulin at either the T220 or the N228 residue, located at the microtubule pore or luminal taxoid binding site, respectively. Because of its unique mechanism of action, cyclostreptin overcomes P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance in tumor cells. We used a series of reactive cyclostreptin analogues, 6-chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin, 8-chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin, and [¹⁴C-<i>acetyl</i>]-8-acetyl-cyclostreptin, to characterize the cellular target of the compound and to map the binding site. The three analogues were cytotoxic and stabilized microtubules in both sensitive and multidrug resistant tumor cells. In both types of cells, we identified β-tubulin as the only or the predominantly labeled cellular protein, indicating that covalent binding to microtubules is sufficient to prevent drug efflux mediated by P-glycoprotein. 6-Chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin, 8-chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin, and 8-acetyl-cyclostreptin labeled both microtubules and unassembled tubulin at a single residue of the same tryptic peptide of β-tubulin as was labeled by cyclostreptin (219-LTTPTYGDLNHLVSATMSGVTTCLR-243), but labeling with the analogues occurred at different positions of the peptide. 8-Acetyl-cyclostreptin reacted with either T220 or N228, as did the natural product, while 8-chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin formed a cross-link to C241. Finally, 6-chloroacetyl-cyclostreptin reacted with any of the three residues, thus labeling the pathway for cyclostreptin-like compounds, leading from the pore where these compounds enter the microtubule to the luminal binding pocket