2,052 research outputs found

    New structural model for GeO2/Ge interface: A first-principles study

    Get PDF
    First-principles modeling of a GeO2/Ge(001) interface reveals that sixfold GeO2, which is derived from cristobalite and is different from rutile, dramatically reduces the lattice mismatch at the interface and is much more stable than the conventional fourfold interface. Since the grain boundary between fourfold and sixfold GeO2 is unstable, the sixfold GeO2 forms a large grain at the interface. On the contrary, a comparative study with SiO2 demonstrates that SiO2 maintains a fourfold structure. The sixfold GeO2/Ge interface is shown to be a consequence of the ground-state phase of GeO2. In addition, the electronic structure calculation reveals that sixfold GeO2 at the interface shifts the valence band maximum far from the interface toward the conduction band.Comment: 18 pages, 5 figures, and 2 table

    New structural model for GeO2/Ge interface: A first-principles study

    Full text link
    First-principles modeling of a GeO2/Ge(001) interface reveals that sixfold GeO2, which is derived from cristobalite and is different from rutile, dramatically reduces the lattice mismatch at the interface and is much more stable than the conventional fourfold interface. Since the grain boundary between fourfold and sixfold GeO2 is unstable, the sixfold GeO2 forms a large grain at the interface. On the contrary, a comparative study with SiO2 demonstrates that SiO2 maintains a fourfold structure. The sixfold GeO2/Ge interface is shown to be a consequence of the ground-state phase of GeO2. In addition, the electronic structure calculation reveals that sixfold GeO2 at the interface shifts the valence band maximum far from the interface toward the conduction band.Comment: 18 pages, 5 figures, and 2 table

    5,5-Bis(4-methoxyΒ­phenΒ­yl)-2,8-bisΒ­[3-(trifluoroΒ­methΒ­yl)phenΒ­yl]-5H-cycloΒ­pentaΒ­[2,1-b:3,4-b’]dipyridine

    Get PDF
    The title compound, C39H26F6N2O2, showed two melting transitions 477.4 and 506.5β€…K in a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study. The first of these can be attributed to a melting phase transition arising from the rotation of two trifluoroΒ­methyl groups. In the crystal structure, both trifluoroΒ­methyl groups are disordered over two sites with occupancy factors of 0.660β€…(17) and 0.340β€…(17) for the major and minor orientations, respectively. The introduction of trifluoroΒ­methyl groups inhibits Ο€-stacking between the diazaΒ­fluorene (cycloΒ­pentaΒ­[2,1-b:3,4-b’]dipyridine) units. Three short Fβ‹―O contacts between 2.80β€…(3) and 2.95β€…(1)β€…Γ… are observed in the crystal structure

    First-Principles Study on Structural Properties of GeO2_2 and SiO2_2 under Compression and Expansion Pressure

    Full text link
    The detailed analysis of the structural variations of three GeO2_2 and SiO2_2 polymorphs (Ξ±\alpha-quartz, Ξ±\alpha-cristobalite, and rutile) under compression and expansion pressure is reported. First-principles total-energy calculations reveal that the rutile structure is the most stable phase among the phases of GeO2_2, while SiO2_2 preferentially forms quartz. GeO4_4 tetrahedras of quartz and cristobalite GeO2_2 phases at the equilibrium volume are more significantly distorted than those of SiO2_2. Moreover, in the case of quartz GeO2_2 and cristobalite GeO2_2, all O-Ge-O bond angles vary when the volume of the GeO2_2 bulk changes from the equilibrium point, which causes further deformation of tetrahedra. In contrast, the tilt angle formed by Si-O-Si in SiO2_2 markedly changes. This flexibility of the O-Ge-O bonds reduces the stress at the Ge/GeO2_2 interface due to the lattice-constant mismatch and results in the low defective interface observed in the experiments [Matsubara \textit{et al.}: Appl. Phys. Lett. \textbf{93} (2008) 032104; Hosoi \textit{et al.}: Appl. Phys. Lett. \textbf{94} (2009) 202112].Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures and 2 table
    • …
    corecore