6 research outputs found
Predicting the Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes from First Principles
The
most important experimental quantity describing the thermodynamics
of metal-ion binding with various (in)Âorganic ligands, or biomolecules,
is the stability constant of the complex (β). In principle,
it can be calculated as the free-energy change associated with the
metal-ion complexation, i.e., its uptake from the solution under standard
conditions. Because this process is associated with the interactions
of charged species, large values of interaction and solvation energies
are in general involved. Using the standard thermodynamic cycle (in
vacuo complexation and solvation/desolvation of the reference state
and of the resulting complexes), one usually subtracts values of several
hundreds of kilocalories per mole to obtain final results on the order
of units or tens of kilocalories per mole. In this work, we use density
functional theory and MøllerâPlesset second-order perturbation
theory calculations together with the conductor-like screening model
for realistic solvation to calculate the stability constants of selected
complexesî¸[MÂ(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(Imi)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>(His)]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>(Cys)], [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>(Cys)], [MÂ(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(SCH<sub>2</sub>COO)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2â</sup>î¸with eight divalent metal ions (Mn<sup>2+</sup>, Fe<sup>2+</sup>, Co<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Cd<sup>2+</sup>, and Hg<sup>2+</sup>). Using the currently available
computational protocols, we show that it is possible to achieve a <i>relative</i> accuracy of 2â4 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> (1â3 orders of magnitude in β). However, because most
of the computed values are affected by metal- and ligand-dependent
systematic shifts, the accuracy of the âabsoluteâ (uncorrected)
values is generally lower. For metal-dependent systematic shifts,
we propose the specific values to be used for the given metal ion
and current protocol. At the same time, we argue that ligand-dependent
shifts (which cannot be easily removed) do not influence the metal-ion
selectivity of the particular site, and therefore it can be computed
to within 2 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> average accuracy. Finally,
a critical discussion is presented that aims at potential caveats
that one may encounter in theoretical predictions of the stability
constants and highlights the perspective that theoretical calculations
may become both competitive and complementary tools to experimental
measurements
Predicting the Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes from First Principles
The
most important experimental quantity describing the thermodynamics
of metal-ion binding with various (in)Âorganic ligands, or biomolecules,
is the stability constant of the complex (β). In principle,
it can be calculated as the free-energy change associated with the
metal-ion complexation, i.e., its uptake from the solution under standard
conditions. Because this process is associated with the interactions
of charged species, large values of interaction and solvation energies
are in general involved. Using the standard thermodynamic cycle (in
vacuo complexation and solvation/desolvation of the reference state
and of the resulting complexes), one usually subtracts values of several
hundreds of kilocalories per mole to obtain final results on the order
of units or tens of kilocalories per mole. In this work, we use density
functional theory and MøllerâPlesset second-order perturbation
theory calculations together with the conductor-like screening model
for realistic solvation to calculate the stability constants of selected
complexesî¸[MÂ(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(Imi)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>(His)]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>(Cys)], [MÂ(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>(Cys)], [MÂ(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, [MÂ(SCH<sub>2</sub>COO)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2â</sup>î¸with eight divalent metal ions (Mn<sup>2+</sup>, Fe<sup>2+</sup>, Co<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Cd<sup>2+</sup>, and Hg<sup>2+</sup>). Using the currently available
computational protocols, we show that it is possible to achieve a <i>relative</i> accuracy of 2â4 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> (1â3 orders of magnitude in β). However, because most
of the computed values are affected by metal- and ligand-dependent
systematic shifts, the accuracy of the âabsoluteâ (uncorrected)
values is generally lower. For metal-dependent systematic shifts,
we propose the specific values to be used for the given metal ion
and current protocol. At the same time, we argue that ligand-dependent
shifts (which cannot be easily removed) do not influence the metal-ion
selectivity of the particular site, and therefore it can be computed
to within 2 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> average accuracy. Finally,
a critical discussion is presented that aims at potential caveats
that one may encounter in theoretical predictions of the stability
constants and highlights the perspective that theoretical calculations
may become both competitive and complementary tools to experimental
measurements
Macrocycle Conformational Sampling by DFT-D3/COSMO-RS Methodology
To
find and calibrate a robust and reliable computational protocol
for mapping conformational space of medium-sized molecules, exhaustive
conformational sampling has been carried out for a series of seven <i>macrocyclic</i> compounds of varying ring size and one acyclic
analogue. While five of them were taken from the MD/LLMOD/force field
study by Shelley and co-workers (Watts, K. S.; Dalal, P.; Tebben, A. J.; Cheney, D. L.; Shelley, J. C. Macrocycle Conformational Sampling with MacroModel. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 2680â2696), three represent potential macrocyclic inhibitors of human cyclophilin
A. The free energy values (<i>G</i><sub>DFT/COSMOâRS</sub>) for all of the conformers of each compound were obtained by a composite
protocol based on <i>in vacuo</i> quantum mechanics (DFT-D3
method in a large basis set), standard gas-phase thermodynamics, and
the COSMO-RS solvation model. The <i>G</i><sub>DFT/COSMOâRS</sub> values were used as the reference for evaluating the performance
of conformational sampling algorithms: standard and extended MD/LLMOD
search (simulated-annealing molecular dynamics with low-lying eigenvector
following algorithms, employing the OPLS2005 force field plus GBSA
solvation) available in MacroModel and plain molecular dynamics (MD)
sampling at high temperature (1000 K) using the semiempirical quantum
mechanics (SQM) potential SQMÂ(PM6-D3H4/COSMO) followed by energy minimization
of the snapshots. It has been shown that the former protocol (MD/LLMOD)
may provide a more complete set of initial structures that ultimately
leads to the identification of a greater number of low-energy conformers
(as assessed by <i>G</i><sub>DFT/COSMOâRS</sub>)
than the latter (i.e., plain SQM MD). The CPU time needed to fully
evaluate one medium-sized <i>compound</i> (âź100 atoms,
typically resulting in several hundred or a few thousand conformers
generated and treated quantum-mechanically) is approximately 1,000â100,000
CPU hours on todayâs computers, which transforms to 1â7
days on a small-sized computer cluster with a few hundred CPUs. Finally,
our data sets based on the rigorous quantum-chemical approach allow
us to formulate a composite conformational sampling protocol with
multiple checkpoints and truncation of redundant structural data that
offers superior insights at affordable computational cost
Toward Accurate Conformational Energies of Smaller Peptides and Medium-Sized Macrocycles: MPCONF196 Benchmark Energy Data Set
A carefully
selected set of acyclic and cyclic model peptides and
several other macrocycles, comprising 13 compounds in total, has been
used to calibrate the accuracy of the DFTÂ(-D3) method for conformational
energies, employing BP86, PBE0, PBE, B3LYP, BLYP, TPSS, TPSSh, M06-2X,
B97-D, OLYP, revPBE, M06-L, SCAN, revTPSS, BH-LYP, and ĎB97X-D3
functionals. Both high- and low-energy conformers, 15 or 16 for each
compound adding to 196 in total, denoted as the MPCONF196 data set,
were included, and the reference values were obtained by the composite
protocol, yielding the CCSDÂ(T)/âCBS extrapolated energies or
their DLPNO-CCSDÂ(T)/âCBS equivalents in the case of larger
systems. The latter was shown to be in near-quantitative (âź0.10â0.15
kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup>) agreement with the canonical CCSDÂ(T),
provided the TightPNO setting is used, and, therefore, can be used
as the reference for larger systems (likely up to 150â200 atoms)
for the problem studied here. At the same time, it was found that
many D3-corrected DFT functionals provide results of âź1 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> accuracy, which we consider as quite encouraging.
This result implies that DFT-D3 methods can be, for example, safely
used in efficient conformational sampling algorithms. Specifically,
the DFT-D3/âDZVP-DFT level of calculation seems to be the best
trade-off between computational cost and accuracy. Based on the calculated
data, we have not found any cheaper variant for the treatment of conformational
energies, since the semiempirical methods (including DFTB) provide
results of inferior accuracy (errors of 3â5 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup>)
Toward Accurate Conformational Energies of Smaller Peptides and Medium-Sized Macrocycles: MPCONF196 Benchmark Energy Data Set
A carefully
selected set of acyclic and cyclic model peptides and
several other macrocycles, comprising 13 compounds in total, has been
used to calibrate the accuracy of the DFTÂ(-D3) method for conformational
energies, employing BP86, PBE0, PBE, B3LYP, BLYP, TPSS, TPSSh, M06-2X,
B97-D, OLYP, revPBE, M06-L, SCAN, revTPSS, BH-LYP, and ĎB97X-D3
functionals. Both high- and low-energy conformers, 15 or 16 for each
compound adding to 196 in total, denoted as the MPCONF196 data set,
were included, and the reference values were obtained by the composite
protocol, yielding the CCSDÂ(T)/âCBS extrapolated energies or
their DLPNO-CCSDÂ(T)/âCBS equivalents in the case of larger
systems. The latter was shown to be in near-quantitative (âź0.10â0.15
kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup>) agreement with the canonical CCSDÂ(T),
provided the TightPNO setting is used, and, therefore, can be used
as the reference for larger systems (likely up to 150â200 atoms)
for the problem studied here. At the same time, it was found that
many D3-corrected DFT functionals provide results of âź1 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup> accuracy, which we consider as quite encouraging.
This result implies that DFT-D3 methods can be, for example, safely
used in efficient conformational sampling algorithms. Specifically,
the DFT-D3/âDZVP-DFT level of calculation seems to be the best
trade-off between computational cost and accuracy. Based on the calculated
data, we have not found any cheaper variant for the treatment of conformational
energies, since the semiempirical methods (including DFTB) provide
results of inferior accuracy (errors of 3â5 kcal¡mol<sup>â1</sup>)
Cyclam Derivatives with a Bis(phosphinate) or a PhosphinatoâPhosphonate Pendant Arm: Ligands for Fast and Efficient Copper(II) Complexation for Nuclear Medical Applications
Cyclam
derivatives bearing one geminal bisÂ(phosphinic acid), âCH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>2</sub>HCH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> (H<sub>2</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup>), or phosphinicâphosphonic
acid, âCH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>2</sub>HCH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>3</sub>H<sub>2</sub> (H<sub>3</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>), pendant arm were synthesized and studied as potential copperÂ(II)
chelators for nuclear medical applications. The ligands showed good
selectivity for copperÂ(II) over zincÂ(II) and nickelÂ(II) ions (log <i>K</i><sub>CuL</sub> = 25.8 and 27.7 for H<sub>2</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup> and H<sub>3</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>, respectively). Kinetic study revealed an unusual
three-step complex formation mechanism. The initial equilibrium step
leads to <i>out-of-cage</i> complexes with Cu<sup>2+</sup> bound by the phosphorus-containing pendant arm. These species quickly
rearrange to an <i>in-cage</i> complex with cyclam conformation <b>II</b>, which isomerizes to another <i>in-cage</i> complex
with cyclam conformation <b>I</b>. The first <i>in-cage</i> complex is quantitatively formed in seconds (pH â5, 25 °C,
Cu:L = 1:1, <i>c</i><sub>M</sub> â 1 mM). At pH >12, <b>I</b> isomers undergo nitrogen atom inversion, leading to <b>III</b> isomers; the structure of the <b>III</b>-[CuÂ(H<b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>)] complex in the solid state was
confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. In an alkaline solution,
interconversion of the <b>I</b> and <b>III</b> isomers
is mutual, leading to the same equilibrium isomeric mixture; such
behavior has been observed here for the first time for copperÂ(II)
complexes of cyclam derivatives. Quantum-chemical calculations showed
small energetic differences between the isomeric complexes of H<sub>3</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup> compared with analogous
data for isomeric complexes of cyclam derivatives with one or two
methylphosphonic acid pendant arm(s). Acid-assisted dissociation proved
the kinetic inertness of the complexes. Preliminary radiolabeling
of H<sub>2</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup> and H<sub>3</sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup> with <sup>64</sup>Cu was fast and efficient, even at room temperature, giving specific
activities of around 70 GBq of <sup>64</sup>Cu per 1 Îźmol of
the ligand (pH 6.2, 10 min, ca. 90 equiv of the ligand). These specific
activities were much higher than those of H<sub>3</sub><b>nota</b> and H<sub>4</sub><b>dota</b> complexes prepared under identical
conditions. The rare combination of simple ligand synthesis, very
fast copperÂ(II) complex formation, high thermodynamic stability, kinetic
inertness, efficient radiolabeling, and expected low bone tissue affinity
makes such ligands suitably predisposed to serve as chelators of copper
radioisotopes in nuclear medicine