4 research outputs found

    Analysing and Applying Stakeholder Perceptions to Improve Protected Area Governance in Ugandan Conservation Landscapes

    Get PDF
    Given the diversity of active institutions and stakeholders in a landscape, and the difficulties in ensuring inclusive decision-making, evaluating landscape governance can help surface and address underlying issues. In the context of two protected area landscapes in Uganda, where landscape approaches are being implemented through a wider project on landscape governance, we analyse stakeholder perceptions of inclusive decision-making and then use this evaluation to stimulate dialogue amongst stakeholder groups in each landscape. We ask, how can capturing, analysing, and collaboratively applying people’s perceptions address inclusive decision-making in landscape governance? We collected and analysed perceptions using SenseMaker®, a software package that enables analysis of micronarratives (stories) from the field based on how respondents classify their own stories, using triads, dyads, stones, and multiple-choice questions. This self-categorisation by the respondent reduces bias in the analysis and allows the micronarrative to be cross-examined in a variety of ways when analysed using Sensemaker. This analysis created an integrated view of the stakeholder’s perceptions about inclusive decision-making in landscape governance. The results show large portions of the respondents feel their voices are neglected, and management of the landscape is poor in Mount Elgon, while in Agoro-Agu, it is the opposite trend. During a community feedback process, reasons for these trends were discussed and solutions proposed. Some of the underlying factors include historical relationships with park authorities and displacement during park creation. To more precisely answer our research question, one could have extended stays in the communities studied in these landscapes, using ethnographic methods including interviews and participant observation; nonetheless, our method, including the feedback process, was an innovative and important way to confront our findings with the informants directly and foster collaborative action. We conclude that understanding people’s perceptions, including through participatory feedback, can significantly inform and improve management decisions, help resolve conflicts, and facilitate dialogue between different stakeholders in the landscape

    Why does HIV infection not lead to disseminated strongyloidiasis?

    No full text
    We investigated the hypothesis that host immunosuppression due to advancing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease favors the direct development of infective larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis, which may facilitate hyperinfection and, hence, disseminated strongyloidiasis. To do this, we sought correlations between the immune status of the subjects and the development of S. stercoralis infections. Among 35 adults, there were significant negative rank correlations between CD4+ cell counts and the proportions of free-living male and female worms. Thus, in individuals with preserved immune function, direct development of S. stercoralis is favored, whereas, in individuals with lesser immune function, indirect development is relatively more common. These results may explain the notable absence of disseminated strongyloidiasis in advanced HIV disease. Because disseminated infection requires the direct development of infective larvae in the gut, the observed favoring of indirect development in individuals immunosuppressed by advancing HIV disease is not consistent with the promotion of disseminated infection
    corecore